skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Hmmmm..........a new one on me. A group of kids suing the government for "inaction on climate change"......thus "violating children's constitutional rights to freedom, liberty and property". Holy fuck....
....these pos's are now resorting to using kids to meet economic and political objectives.
Except the factual assertions of the lawsuit are fatally flawed.............as the author astutely points out here >>>
That is only the beginning of the problematic factual assertions and assumptions underlying the children's lawsuit. The measureable effects of increasing GHG concentrations are far smaller than the climate models would lead one to believe. The degree to which recent warming has been anthropogenic is unsettled in the scientific literature; and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its fifth assessment report (AR5) has reduced its estimated range of the effect in 2100 of a doubling of GHG concentrations from 2.0–4.5 to 1.5–4.5 degrees C.
There actually is little evidence of strong climate effects attendant upon increasing GHG concentrations, in terms of sea levels; Arctic and Antarctic sea ice; tornado activity; tropical cyclones; U.S. wildfires; drought; and flooding. IPCC in the AR5 is deeply dubious (Table 12.4) about the various severe effects often hypothesized (or asserted) as future impacts of increasing GHG concentrations
fakery is ghey
The author correctly concludes.........
"It is part of the long-term effort by the environmental left to use any means possible to exert control over other people's property, economic choices, and lifestyles"
The Children's Climate Lawsuit Against The Children | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD
Indeed........anybody with even half a brain can take a casual look into the topic of climate change just outside the matrix and will determine that this is bogus science being used to meet political objectives.

Except the factual assertions of the lawsuit are fatally flawed.............as the author astutely points out here >>>
That is only the beginning of the problematic factual assertions and assumptions underlying the children's lawsuit. The measureable effects of increasing GHG concentrations are far smaller than the climate models would lead one to believe. The degree to which recent warming has been anthropogenic is unsettled in the scientific literature; and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its fifth assessment report (AR5) has reduced its estimated range of the effect in 2100 of a doubling of GHG concentrations from 2.0–4.5 to 1.5–4.5 degrees C.
There actually is little evidence of strong climate effects attendant upon increasing GHG concentrations, in terms of sea levels; Arctic and Antarctic sea ice; tornado activity; tropical cyclones; U.S. wildfires; drought; and flooding. IPCC in the AR5 is deeply dubious (Table 12.4) about the various severe effects often hypothesized (or asserted) as future impacts of increasing GHG concentrations
fakery is ghey

The author correctly concludes.........
"It is part of the long-term effort by the environmental left to use any means possible to exert control over other people's property, economic choices, and lifestyles"
The Children's Climate Lawsuit Against The Children | Stock News & Stock Market Analysis - IBD
Indeed........anybody with even half a brain can take a casual look into the topic of climate change just outside the matrix and will determine that this is bogus science being used to meet political objectives.