Clarence Thomas' wife cheers on mob at Capital

JimH52

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2007
46,740
24,725
2,645
US

Yeah...she is really nuts. I have read a couple things that say she is over the edge. I guess she is. She probably enjoyed creepy Clarence's sexual advances early on. Anita told him to shove it and this crazy woman wanted him to bring it on.
 
So weird. When was the last time Clarence Thomas's wife was relevant? I mean, really, when the fuck?

You really don't think the wife of a USSC justice supporting an incursion on our Capital Building is not relevant? Are you smoking crack? Thomas is just part of the trump Cabal...
I repeat.

"When was the last time Clarence Thomas's wife was relevant? "
 

Yeah...she is really nuts. I have read a couple things that say she is over the edge. I guess she is. She probably enjoyed creepy Clarence's sexual advances early on. Anita told him to shove it and this crazy woman wanted him to bring it on.

Yeah, Anita was the non-crazy one.......DURR
 

Yeah...she is really nuts. I have read a couple things that say she is over the edge. I guess she is. She probably enjoyed creepy Clarence's sexual advances early on. Anita told him to shove it and this crazy woman wanted him to bring it on.

She's a sick disgusting racist!
 
NPC Crowd Free Speech is Violence.jpg
 

Yeah...she is really nuts. I have read a couple things that say she is over the edge. I guess she is. She probably enjoyed creepy Clarence's sexual advances early on. Anita told him to shove it and this crazy woman wanted him to bring it on.

So if Thomas is accountable for the actions of his wife then Biden should be accountable for the actions of his son, seems fair. Let's compare Hunter porn with underage girls some he's related to and Thomas wife twitter post supporting the peaceful TRUMP protesters... :eusa_think:
 
So weird. When was the last time Clarence Thomas's wife was relevant? I mean, really, when the fuck?

You really don't think the wife of a USSC justice supporting an incursion on our Capital Building is not relevant? Are you smoking crack? Thomas is just part of the trump Cabal...
I repeat.

"When was the last time Clarence Thomas's wife was relevant? "


She's only relevant to Fascists & Communists who think people should be cancelled for statements made by their relatives.
 

Yeah...she is really nuts. I have read a couple things that say she is over the edge. I guess she is. She probably enjoyed creepy Clarence's sexual advances early on. Anita told him to shove it and this crazy woman wanted him to bring it on.

She's a sick disgusting racist!

I can somewhat understand with the way her husband has been treated. Years of that will take a toll on you.

I dislike the majority of his rulings but that doesn't excuse some of the things said about him.
 
Nothing new to have people cheer on violence in our country, I saw it from major news outlets during the BLM riots quite a bit. Sick no matter who does it, but there's no excuse for places like CNN advocating for non-peaceful protest, calling violence "truth to power" and the "voice of the oppressed"...
 
LOL Nailing the hypocrisy of the left, right here.

The left spent all of 2020 encouraging the wanton destruction wrought by BLM and Antifa. Cities were burned, hundreds of businesses large and small were reduced to ash, thousands of stores, homes, public spaces, and monuments were vandalized. And it was all good, because, as Chris Cuomo ... said back in June (as BLM thugs were sacking cities across the nation), “Show me where it says protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.”
Yep, back in the summer, raucous protests were just fine.
If cops, business owners, or concerned citizens dared to harm a BLM or Antifa thug in self-defense, they were guilty of murder. Because violent protesters were not to be opposed. The right to smash, punch, and intimidate is guaranteed by the First Amendment. Maybe that’s not spelled out in the Bill of Rights, maybe it’s not supported by 230 years of Supreme Court precedent, but it’s there, between the lines, in the left’s supplemental footnotes, right alongside the unqualified right to abortion.
But as of Jan. 6, that all changed. Now “impolite” protests are insurrection, treason, and terrorism. All of a sudden, the left has decided that the only good protest is one in which mannered gentlemen with muttonchops exchange platitudes whilst nibbling on cucumber sandwiches and sipping fine aromatic tea.


 
So weird. When was the last time Clarence Thomas's wife was relevant? I mean, really, when the fuck?

You really don't think the wife of a USSC justice supporting an incursion on our Capital Building is not relevant? Are you smoking crack? Thomas is just part of the trump Cabal...
I repeat.

"When was the last time Clarence Thomas's wife was relevant? "


She's only relevant to Fascists & Communists who think people should be cancelled for statements made by their relatives.
Okay, run with that and see how it goes.
 
Nothing new to have people cheer on violence in our country, I saw it from major news outlets during the BLM riots quite a bit. Sick no matter who does it, but there's no excuse for places like CNN advocating for non-peaceful protest, calling violence "truth to power" and the "voice of the oppressed"...
What?
 

Yeah...she is really nuts. I have read a couple things that say she is over the edge. I guess she is. She probably enjoyed creepy Clarence's sexual advances early on. Anita told him to shove it and this crazy woman wanted him to bring it on.
What a loaded headline.
Hysterical.
 

Forum List

Back
Top