Zone1 Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment

[Monk-Eye]

" Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment "

* Meaning For And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause *

Consider the terms " born " and " naturalized " in relationship with the clause of " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " from us 14th amendment .

The " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment includes a contingency that an individual born in the united states may not be a subject of us jurisdiction and therefore would not be a citizen of the united states .

An individual born in the united states , whom would not receive us citizenship , would include any born of an individual whom does not qualify as a subject in the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment .

To be a subject in the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause of us 14th amendment requires an individual to have a legal title in the united states , whether the title is as a us citizen , or whether the title is on a visa in us legal immigration system .

Individuals sojourning within the united states and not subjects by title on visa in us legal immigration system are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the united states , according to us 14th amendment .

Any individual born in the united states to individuals whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , are also not subjects of us jurisdiction and are to receive jus sanguinin citizenship in the maternal fraternal country of citizen ship origin .


* Important Contemporary Misconception That Subject To Means Ability To Be Punished Rather Than And Obligation For Protection "

A contemporary misconception exists about the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment , and the misconception is that being subject to the jurisdiction thereof is congruent with a domain within which the united states can exercise a legal authority without opposition .

A valid perspective for the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment is that the united states is remanded to protect the civil liberties of its citizens and to seek justice , whether the subjects by title of the united states are within its borders or traveling abroad with or without being a subject by title in the legal immigration system of another country .

When a non citizen individual becomes a subject by title in us legal immigration systems , the united states incurs an onus of accountability for issuing a retort for violation of civil liberties against the non citizen , as otherwise the responsibility for issuing a retort for violations against the civil liberties of the non citizen individuals occurs through diplomacy or through diplomatic request .

The citizens of the domain , wherein the united states may exercise its legal authority , cooperate and collaborate for justice through diplomatic requests from foreign nations on behalf of those subject to the jurisdiction thereof .

Any migrant whom is not a subject by title in us legal immigration systems is not technically subject to the jurisdiction thereof , and children born within the united states to such a migrant is also not subject to the jurisdiction of the united states , and the child is to receive jus sanguinin citizenship in the country of maternal ( fraternal by dna ) origin .


* Citizen And Non Citizen Individuals *

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


* Corollary For Onus Of Accountability To Protect And To Issue A Retort For Justice *

Civis Romanus sum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[jwoodie]

The 14th Amendment directly modified Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution to eliminate the 3/5 apportionment provision for freed slaves and give them full citizenship rights.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" When Some Thing Is Better Than No Thing "

* Subject Of Jurisdiction By Title Is Equivalent With And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof *

The 14th Amendment directly modified Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution to eliminate the 3/5 apportionment provision for freed slaves and give them full citizenship rights.

Ableit against their will , slaves were subjects by title in us legal immigration system , and children born in the united states to slaves became citizens by birth , assuming us 14th amendment was retroactive .

An etymology of the term person within us constitution implies that only males may be citizens - per ( countable by census ) and son ( male ) .

The term person should be deprecated from terminology used to construct constitutions and the term individual should be used in its place .

 

[BackAgain]

" Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment "

* Meaning For And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause *

Consider the terms " born " and " naturalized " in relationship with the clause of " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " from us 14th amendment .

The " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment includes a contingency that an individual born in the united states may not be a subject of us jurisdiction and therefore would not be a citizen of the united states .

An individual born in the united states , whom would not receive us citizenship , would include any born of an individual whom does not qualify as a subject in the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment .

To be a subject in the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause of us 14th amendment requires an individual to have a legal title in the united states , whether the title is as a us citizen , or whether the title is on a visa in us legal immigration system .

Individuals sojourning within the united states and not subjects by title on visa in us legal immigration system are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the united states , according to us 14th amendment .

Any individual born in the united states to individuals whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , are also not subjects of us jurisdiction and are to receive jus sanguinin citizenship in the maternal fraternal country of citizen ship origin .


* Important Contemporary Misconception That Subject To Means Ability To Be Punished Rather Than And Obligation For Protection "

A contemporary misconception exists about the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment , and the misconception is that being subject to the jurisdiction thereof is congruent with a domain within which the united states can exercise a legal authority without opposition .

A valid perspective for the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment is that the united states is remanded to protect the civil liberties of its citizens and to seek justice , whether the subjects by title of the united states are within its borders or traveling abroad with or without being a subject by title in the legal immigration system of another country .

When a non citizen individual becomes a subject by title in us legal immigration systems , the united states incurs an onus of accountability for issuing a retort for violation of civil liberties against the non citizen , as otherwise the responsibility for issuing a retort for violations against the civil liberties of the non citizen individuals occurs through diplomacy or through diplomatic request .

The citizens of the domain , wherein the united states may exercise its legal authority , cooperate and collaborate for justice through diplomatic requests from foreign nations on behalf of those subject to the jurisdiction thereof .

Any migrant whom is not a subject by title in us legal immigration systems is not technically subject to the jurisdiction thereof , and children born within the united states to such a migrant is also not subject to the jurisdiction of the united states , and the child is to receive jus sanguinin citizenship in the country of maternal ( fraternal by dna ) origin .


* Citizen And Non Citizen Individuals *

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


* Corollary For Onus Of Accountability To Protect And To Issue A Retort For Justice *

Civis Romanus sum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

While the op is very verbose and poorly written, at least it doesn’t merit any attention.

I skimmed it enough to know. It’s like looking at a car accident as you pass by.

 

[jwoodie]

The term person should be deprecated from terminology used to construct constitutions and the term individual should be used in its place .

The term "person" was used because there was no such thing as a citizen of the United States at the time the Constitution was written.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Citizens Of A Republic Have Exclusive Privilege To Cast Votes In Elections "

* Patriarchal Factoids From Antiquity *

The term "person" was used because there was no such thing as a citizen of the United States at the time the Constitution was written.

An etymology of the term person includes the eponyms of per and son , with a transliterate meaning of countable by census and male .

An included supposition about a republic is that casting votes in elections is exclusive to its citizens , and us 19th amendment confirms that all men are created equal surreptitiously implies women are not equal with men .

The term individual is a valid and correct reference to citizens or non citizens , whom are countable by census and independent of identity politics .

A reference to the term right , for descriptions in social civil contracts comprising a constitution , is not synonymous with a rite of behavior or with a normative value , and the term right should be deprecated and replaced .

Applying THe Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction

* Applying The Term Rights As A Descriptor For Articles Of A Constitution Is Slang And A Profound Error In Diction * * Opening Post Subjective Objective Sew Gnomon * The term right is a faux pas of diction , as to equivocate the term right with a mathematical norm leads to a contradiction ...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[surada]

" Civis Etas Unis Sum And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause From Us 14th Amendment "

* Meaning For And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause *

Consider the terms " born " and " naturalized " in relationship with the clause of " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " from us 14th amendment .

The " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment includes a contingency that an individual born in the united states may not be a subject of us jurisdiction and therefore would not be a citizen of the united states .

An individual born in the united states , whom would not receive us citizenship , would include any born of an individual whom does not qualify as a subject in the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment .

To be a subject in the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause of us 14th amendment requires an individual to have a legal title in the united states , whether the title is as a us citizen , or whether the title is on a visa in us legal immigration system .

Individuals sojourning within the united states and not subjects by title on visa in us legal immigration system are not subject to the jurisdiction thereof in the united states , according to us 14th amendment .

Any individual born in the united states to individuals whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , are also not subjects of us jurisdiction and are to receive jus sanguinin citizenship in the maternal fraternal country of citizen ship origin .


* Important Contemporary Misconception That Subject To Means Ability To Be Punished Rather Than And Obligation For Protection "

A contemporary misconception exists about the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment , and the misconception is that being subject to the jurisdiction thereof is congruent with a domain within which the united states can exercise a legal authority without opposition .

A valid perspective for the " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment is that the united states is remanded to protect the civil liberties of its citizens and to seek justice , whether the subjects by title of the united states are within its borders or traveling abroad with or without being a subject by title in the legal immigration system of another country .

When a non citizen individual becomes a subject by title in us legal immigration systems , the united states incurs an onus of accountability for issuing a retort for violation of civil liberties against the non citizen , as otherwise the responsibility for issuing a retort for violations against the civil liberties of the non citizen individuals occurs through diplomacy or through diplomatic request .

The citizens of the domain , wherein the united states may exercise its legal authority , cooperate and collaborate for justice through diplomatic requests from foreign nations on behalf of those subject to the jurisdiction thereof .

Any migrant whom is not a subject by title in us legal immigration systems is not technically subject to the jurisdiction thereof , and children born within the united states to such a migrant is also not subject to the jurisdiction of the united states , and the child is to receive jus sanguinin citizenship in the country of maternal ( fraternal by dna ) origin .


* Citizen And Non Citizen Individuals *

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


* Corollary For Onus Of Accountability To Protect And To Issue A Retort For Justice *

Civis Romanus sum - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If you are on US soil you are subject to US jurisdiction. The exception is the child born to diplomats.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Correcting False Presumptions Intended To Remove The Autonomy Of Us Citizens "

* Diplomacy Agreements Prior To Becoming A Subject By Title With Immunity *

If you are on US soil you are subject to US jurisdiction. The exception is the child born to diplomats.

A diplomat enters into a diplomatic agreement for immunity , which has been perceived incorrectly as the us being without an agreement of accountability to provide protections for or responsibility to issue a retort for violations of civil liberties against the diplomat .

A diplomat is a subject by title in us legal immigration system and us is responsible for protection and issuance of retort in addition to there being an agreement for immunity from prosecution .

An individual whom is not a subject by title in a legal immigration system by visa has not negotiated a contractual agreement to be a subject by title in us legal immigration system , and certainly immunity from prosecution has not been agreed upon .

In fact a contractual agreement of diplomacy does not exist for a sojourner whom is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system and therefore the sojourner remains a subject by title as a citizen from their country of origin , and the country of origin is contractually and technically responsible for protecting and issuing a retort for violations of civil liberties against its citizens .

When a citizen of a country is outside the domain of ability for its government to implement legal standard , a responsibility of country to protect or issue retort for violations against its subjects by title of citizenship occurs technically through diplomacy .


* Children Born In The Us To Migrants Not Subjects By Title In Us Legal Immigration System Receive Jus Sanguinis Citizenship *

A supposition that ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause from us 14th amendment means only whether etas unis can issue a retort for violations of its laws is false .

The ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause from us 14th amendment determines a contractual obligation to issue a retort for violations of civil liberties against individuals whom are subjects by title , whether as a us citizen , or whether as an individual in us legal immigration system .

The etas unis is contracted by constitution to seek justice for violations of civil liberties against its citizens , whether the citizen is within the domain of us legal authority or outside of it .

A non us citizen individual sojourning abroad is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system by visa and the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause from us 14th amendment excludes the individual from positive liberty of state social subsistence .

A constitutional challenge that illegal migrants are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system of visa , whom are therefore entitled to equal protection of negative liberties of us law , while not being entitled to an endowment of positive liberty for citizenship , has not been petitioned .

The last challenge based on the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' involved the chinese exclusion act where the parents were subjects by title in us legal immigration system when their child was born in the united states , and scotus correctly ruled that citizenship be awarded .

Otherwise , the challenge is well known to be latent in arrival and pending affluence for action .

 

[surada]

" Correcting False Presumptions Intended To Remove The Autonomy Of Us Citizens "

* Diplomacy Agreements Prior To Becoming A Subject By Title With Immunity *

A diplomat enters into a diplomatic agreement for immunity , which has been perceived incorrectly as the us being without an agreement of accountability to provide protections for or responsibility to issue a retort for violations of civil liberties against the diplomat .

A diplomat is a subject by title in us legal immigration system and us is responsible for protection and issuance of retort in addition to there being an agreement for immunity from prosecution .

An individual whom is not a subject by title in a legal immigration system by visa has not negotiated a contractual agreement to be a subject by title in us legal immigration system , and certainly immunity from prosecution has not been agreed upon .

In fact a contractual agreement of diplomacy does not exist for a sojourner whom is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system remains a subject by title as a citizen in their country of origin .


* Children Born In The Us To Migrants Not Subjects By Title In Us Legal Immigration System Receive Jus Sanguinis Citizenship *

A supposition that ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause from us 14th amendment means only whether etas unis can issue a retort for violations of its laws is false .

The ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause from us 14th amendment determines a contractual obligation to issue a retort for violations of civil liberties against individuals whom are subjects by title , whether as a us citizen , or whether as an individual in us legal immigration system .

The etas unis is contracted by constitution to seek justice for violations of civil liberties against its citizens , whether the citizen is within the domain of us legal authority or outside of it .

A non us citizen individual sojourning abroad is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system by visa and the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause from us 14th amendment excludes the individual from positive liberty of state social subsistence .

A constitutional challenge that illegal migrants are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system of visa , whom are therefore entitled to equal protection of negative liberties of us law , while not being entitled to an endowment of positive liberty for citizenship , has not been petitioned .

The last challenge based on the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' involved the chinese exclusion act where the parents were subjects by title in us legal immigration system when their child was born in the united states , and scotus correctly ruled that citizenship be awarded .

Otherwise , the challenge is well known to be latent in arrival and pending affluence for action .

It's really simple. If you're on US soil you're subject to US jurisdiction. No other country's laws apply in the US.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Demarcations Of Negative Versus Positive Liberties For Those Not Subjects By Title Of Visa "

* National Sovereignty Entitled To Protection From Progeny Seeding Of Foreign Agents *

It's really simple. If you're on US soil you're subject to US jurisdiction.

An individual on us soil establishes that the individual can be prosecuted and is entitled to equal protection of negative liberties , however not every individual on us soil is entitled to positive liberties of unequal endowment such as social subsistence , or citizenship , or residence .

An individual on us soil whom is not a citizen , or not a subject by title in us legal immigration system , does not qualify for positive liberties because of the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause of us 14th amendment , in that etas unis has not entered into a diplomatic agreement whereby the individual becomes a subject by title of visa .

Those non us citizen individuals whom are subjects by title of visa in us legal immigration system are entitled to positive liberties of social subsistence , and their children are can likewise become subjects by title as us citizens .

Note that visa agreement include an oath that travel to etas unis is not for the purposes of giving birth .

Policies In Place Against Birth Tourism For Legal Migrants

" Policies In Place Against Birth Tourism For Legal Migrants " * It Is Time To Require jus sanguinis * A Japanese woman was asked to take a pregnancy test before flying to a US island that has become popular for birth tourism A Japanese woman was asked to take a pregnancy test before flying to...

www.usmessageboard.com

* Matter Of Fact For National Sovereignty *

No other country's laws apply in the US.

That statement is correct for there to be sovereignty of any nation , else dominion of authority by a governing body for issuing a retort for violations of its legal pretexts would not exist .

Prior to entering into a social civil contract according to a constitution , individuals are subject to moral relativism in nature for event outcomes , and to improve opportunity for survival and quality of life , an individual exchanges natural freedoms for protection through retort by a state .

From first principles , at its inception a state is comprised of citizens in whom interests of a state lay , while non citizens remain subject to natural freedoms .

A retribution for violations of civil liberties to a sojourner whom is not a subject by title in a foreign legal immigration system occurs technically through diplomacy , while etas unis follows valid virtue and collaborates for justice through equal protection of negative liberties but not through unequal endowments of social subsistence and citizenship for offspring .

 

[surada]

You're verbose and trying to make this complicated. If you are on US soil you are subject to US jurisdiction.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Regardless of original intent or the proper interpretation, the reality is that it needs to be repealed and replaced with a new amendment that makes plain that at least one biological parent must be a citizen for the child to be a natural born citizen.

 

[Curried Goats]

Regardless of original intent or the proper interpretation, the reality is that it needs to be repealed and replaced with a new amendment that makes plain that at least one biological parent must be a citizen for the child to be a natural born citizen.

Good luck with passing that amendment. Until that happens though it looks like all your base are belong to us.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Calling Out Traitorous Beliefs Against Us National Sovereignty "

* Pretentious Hubris Pandered As Legal Precedence Dogma For Defacto Jus Soli *

You're verbose and trying to make this complicated. If you are on US soil you are subject to US jurisdiction.

The case of united states versus kim wong ark resigns a de facto legal precedence for jus soli to the realm of dogma , as the court did not grant defacto citizenship jus soli to children of any sojourner within the borders of etas unis , and a contingency of lawful permanent resident was stipulated as a contingency - a subject by title in us legal immigration system .

The deduction is based simply on first principles of political science for the foundation of state with citizens and national sovereignty .

The deduction is based simply on a distinction between equal protections of negative liberties versus unequal endowment of positive liberties .

* Subjects By Title In Us Legal Immigration System And 14th Amendment Citizenship Applies *

{{meta.fullTitle}}

Facts of the case​

The Chinese Exclusion Acts denied citizenship to Chinese immigrants. Moreover, by treaty no Chinese subject in the United States could become a naturalized citizen. Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to parents who were both Chinese citizens who resided in the United States at the time. At age 21, he returned to China to visit his parents who had previously resided in the United States for 20 years. When he returned to the United States, Wong was denied entry on the ground that he was not a citizen.

Question​

Is a child who was born in the United States to Chinese-citizen parents who are lawful permanent residents of the United States a U.S. citizen under the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Congressional Seats Should Be Allocated Based On Citizens And Not Mobs Of Ghosts "

* No Need To Pass An Amendments Simply Enforce And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause *

Good luck with passing that amendment. Until that happens though it looks like all your base are belong to us.

There is not a need for an amendment , there is a need to enforce the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause of us 14th amendment , there is simply a necessity to publicly explain that united states versus kim wong ark did not defacto issue a legal precedence of jus soli citizenship for children born in the united states of those whom are not subjects by title of visa in us legal immigration system .

* Us 14th Is Good Just Implement Non Citizen Exclusion In Visa As Birth Tourism Is Already Illegal *

Regardless of original intent or the proper interpretation, the reality is that it needs to be repealed and replaced with a new amendment that makes plain that at least one biological parent must be a citizen for the child to be a natural born citizen.

Unless the term per son ( countable by census , male ) is replaced with individual within us 14th amendment , the sanctimonious sacrosanct with anthropocentric psychosis will continue to debase the individual and to proselytize for hive drones and implementation of tyranny by collective majority against abortion .

 

[Curried Goats]

" Congressional Seats Should Be Allocated Based On Citizens And Not Mobs Of Ghosts "

* No Need To Pass An Amendments Simply Enforce And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof Clause *

There is not a need for an amendment , there is a need to enforce the ' and subject to the jurisdiction thereof ' clause of us 14th amendment , there is simply a necessity explain that united states versus kim wong ark did not issue a defacto legal precedence for jus soli citizenship for children born in the united states of those whom are not subjects by title of visa in us legal immigration system .

* Us 14th Is Good Just Implement Non Citizen Exclusion In Visa As Birth Tourism Is Already Illegal *

Unless the term per son ( countable by census , male ) is replaced with individual within us 14th amendment , the sanctimonious sacrosanct with anthropocentric psychosis will continue to debase the individual and to proselytize for hive drones to implement tyranny by collective majority against abortion , and they need to keep their demented hands off of it .

You can argue that until you're blue in the face on a message board but since the Supreme Court, even as conservative as it is presently, doesn't have any interest in taking up that argument, practically speaking you need an amendment.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" A Subject By Title Stipulation Is Overtly Obvious For National Sovereignty "

* Here Say Like Think Due Knot Stop Goading Dogmatic Fabrications *

You can argue that until you're blue in the face on a message board but since the Supreme Court, even as conservative as it is presently, doesn't have any interest in taking up that argument, practically speaking you need an amendment.

The scotus has not been presented with a case for coup de gra'ce against the babbling idiocy of dogma that us 14th amendment grants defacto jus soli citizenship to children born of migrants , when the migrant is not subject by title in us legal immigration system of visa .

United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In the words of a 2007 legal analysis of events following the Wong Kim Ark decision, "The parameters of the jus soli principle, as stated by the court in Wong Kim Ark, have never been seriously questioned by the Supreme Court, and have been accepted as dogma by lower courts."[11] A 2010 review of the history of the Citizenship Clause notes that the Wong Kim Ark decision held that the guarantee of birthright citizenship "applies to children of foreigners present on American soil" and states that the Supreme Court "has not re-examined this issue since the concept of 'illegal alien' entered the language".[12] Since the 1990s, however, controversy has arisen over the longstanding practice of granting automatic citizenship to U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, and legal scholars disagree over whether the Wong Kim Ark precedent applies when alien parents are in the country illegally.[13][14] Attempts have been made from time to time in Congress to restrict birthright citizenship, either via statutory redefinition of the term jurisdiction, or by overriding both the Wong Kim Ark ruling and the Citizenship Clause itself through an amendment to the Constitution, but no such proposal has been enacted.

 

[Curried Goats]

" A Subject By Title Stipulation Is Overtly Obvious For National Sovereignty "

* Here Say Like Think Due Knot Stop Goading Dogmatic Fabrications *

The scotus has not been presented with a case for coup de gra'ce against the babbling idiocy of dogma that us 14th amendment grants defacto jus soli citizenship to children born of migrants , when the migratn is not subject by title in us legal immigration system of visa .

Why not? Feel free to challenge the legitimacy of birth right citizenship for the millions who are born to immigrant parents every year. I was one of them all the way back in 81. Seems you've have plenty of time to find the courage.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Disincentive To Cash In On A Us Social Security Welfare System Must Exist "

* Cowardice For Funding By Jurisprudence And Political Action Groups *

Why not? Feel free to challenge the legitimacy of birth right citizenship for the millions who are born to immigrant parents every year. I was one of them all the way back in 81. Seems you've have plenty of time to find the courage.

Consider a hypothetical situation where the wife or daughter of a foreign diplomat enters the united states without being a subject by title in us legal immigration systems , as an illegal migrant , and has a child in etas unis that is then given jus soli citizenship in the us , rather than jus sangunis citizenship from the country of origin .

Would that hypothetical situation have undermined the purpose for not allowing a child born in the united states to a diplomat to become a citizen ?

Sew , what is the purpose for not allowing a child of a diplomat to become a us citizen if not to assure us national sovereignty ?

Is the purpose to prevent a foreign potentate from acquiring access to the government and highest office within the united states through surrogate and allegiance from the child ?

The courage has not ever been lacking , rather the lawyers , fee press and politicians have not funded contracts to lobby a public agenda , while immigration lawyers work to subvert any opposition to its gravy train through disinformation of legal precedence for jus soli by kim wong ark .

The insight for how to pursue a legal challenge has not been won in a court of public opinion , and intimidation from the religion of secular humanism continues to conjecture legal uncertainty , as the public at large is mired in ignorance for first principles of political science and us constitution .

 

[Curried Goats]

" Disincentive To Cash In On A Us Social Security Welfare System Must Exist "

* Cowardice For Funding By Jurisprudence And Political Action Groups *

Consider a hypothetical situation where the wife or daughter of a foreign diplomat enters the united states without being a subject by title in us legal immigration systems and has a child in etas unis , which is then given jus soli citizenship .

Haven't the births of children to wives or children of diplomats been addressed? Families here under diplomatic relations are still subject to the jurisdictions of their home countries.

Does that not undermine the purpose for not allowing a child born in the united states to a diplomat to become a citizen ?

Sew , what is the purpose for not allowing a child of a diplomat to become a us citizen if not to assure us national sovereignty ?

Is the purpose to prevent a foreign potentate from acquiring access to the government and highest office within the united states through surrogate and allegiance from the child ?

Probably in part.

The courage has not ever been lacking , rather the lawyers , fee press and politicians did not have a funded contracted to lobby for public agenda , while immigration lawyers work to subvert any opposition to its gravy train .

So you're simply innaffective or lazy?

The insight for how to pursue a legal challenge has not been won in a court of public opinion , and intimidation from the religion of secular humanism continues to conjecture legal uncertainty , as the public at large is mired in ignorance for first principles of political science and us constitution .

So then all you have is an impotent opinion, no?