I can agree to an extent, but you take it to areas which must be taken purely on faith.
Yes I agree that any take or interpretion of these things, in relation to the whole, is going to involve faith, depending on what you and I believe or don't believe, and anyone else also.
P said:
Religion is a construct of human behavior. So of course you are going to see patterns repeated. When you speak of the holy trinity, for example, I suspect you refer to a Christian model. But could as easily refer to the Hindu model, or the Egyptian model - both of which predate Christianity considerably. This, I think, says a lot about us but it says absolutely nothing about gods.
If you compare these different trinities, for example
God/Christ/HolySpirit and two great commandments, love of God and love of others
Buddha/Dharma/Sangha and two promises, to develop Wisdom and Compassion
You will see the same aspects that "God" represents showing up on the top level,
and the idea of Christ Jesus fulfilling the laws on the level of conscience or relationship
on the second level. Buddha refers to having perfect knowledge, awareness or wisdom, which can be compared with knowing God/Wisdom or God's truth, universal truth, etc.
Dharma refers to the laws, where the Christian equivalent is the Word of God that Christ represents as becoming embodied in man, where the spirit of the laws is made flesh or real.
Yes, these can all be manmade, and can precede or predate Christ.
The laws of Moses also predated Christ who came later in the process of fulfilling these.
The same can be said of our Constitutional laws and principles we have yet to fully achieve.
The first step is to lay down these laws, and the second step is to see them fulfilled in spirit.
This process is on our man-made level, and does NOT negate the spiritual process going on as developing in our maturity as a human race to work toward peace and justice for all.
So this is still in keeping with the spiritual process and stages given in the Bible or other religions or myths. The fact that these come in different order historically does not negate the way they all reflect the same universal process going on that all humanity experiences.
P said:
As to your statement about truth and justice, I completely disagree. Truth and justice are entirely relative - in the eye of the beholder if you will. Religion, government and law are who not there to provide truth and justice. They are more often than not vehemently opposed to truth and quite unjust. Their purpose, IMO, is to allow human beings to coexist with the minimum amount of violence. The purpose is not to make you happy, it is to allow you the conditions to breed and raise your children until they are old enough to replace you.
a. In order to be sustainable and consistent, the system will eventually need to be reformed where it does align with how human nature is heading, toward mature states and not in unstable cycles of ups and downs from the learning curve, repeating past mistakes until we learn our lessons. So even these secular systems are going to move toward equal protection of the laws or Equal Justice for all people if humanity/society is going to survive longterm.
b. as for relativity, exactly, this is why we have religious and political conflicts and wars.
Everyone can more easily see what they want, and lobby for that to define justice, and has difficulty reconciling with people from another group, culture or nation who are lobbying for their own interests.
Again the only thing that is going to satisfy all people from all angles and groups is what is universally good for all people and nations. When we work toward the highest good for all people equally, then this will also align with our individual agenda and interests.
The church/religious leaders preach this vision from the top down, where people choose to follow the leader/group of their choice.
The state/political leaders are SUPPOSED to be seeking reforms and solutions from the bottom up, by resolving problems and conflicts locally among groups to represent and protect all interests equally, and building upward toward public policies and laws reflecting this consensus or will of the people.
That is how it is supposed to be, and where we meet in the middle, where we agree what is good for us and for others, and all humanity equally, seeking what is the greater good is what it means to reconcile our individual free will with God's will. That agreement by conscience is what it means to be joined in Christ, for sake of universal justice and peace.
It represents the highest "perfect will" all for humanity, and is the one thing that will satisfy and bring peace to all nations, groups and individuals each seeking what is best for us.
If you believe such perfect Justice is possible and is coming for all humanity on earth, that is what it ultimately means to believe in Jesus coming and bringing salvation to all humanity.