Chris Christie makes dirty remark to Female

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 19867
  • Start date Start date
Intellectual honesty - I don't care that he said it. I'm not enraged. *I* wouldn't say that to a chick, albeit she WAS rude. I certainly don't expect a Governor to say shit like that - definitely thread-worthy but def. NOT "care" worthy.

If you don't know what he was talking about - you're out of touch with reality or being intellectually dishonest. Let's be blunt, like Christie was being. It's kind of tired to pretend like that, Surr'osly.

The crowd laughed for a reason, and it's not because saying "something is going to "happen" tonight" is a giggle-worthy line, get the **** real.

Or maybe I just don't see the humor - since childish humor is not funny to me. What he said seemed perfectly reasonable to me. To me, it demonstrates more about the desperation of the left than anything else.

But your misogynistic retort is noted. Why you feel the need to use misogynistic replies instead of just disagreeing or explaining your 'point' is beyond me.

:lmao:

Are you seriously complaining about a misogynistic reply right now?!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
I'm having a hard time deciding who is slower on the uptake in this thread, CG or TM
 
Intellectual honesty - I don't care that he said it. I'm not enraged. *I* wouldn't say that to a chick, albeit she WAS rude. I certainly don't expect a Governor to say shit like that - definitely thread-worthy but def. NOT "care" worthy.

If you don't know what he was talking about - you're out of touch with reality or being intellectually dishonest. Let's be blunt, like Christie was being. It's kind of tired to pretend like that, Surr'osly.

The crowd laughed for a reason, and it's not because saying "something is going to "happen" tonight" is a giggle-worthy line, get the **** real.

Or maybe I just don't see the humor - since childish humor is not funny to me. What he said seemed perfectly reasonable to me. To me, it demonstrates more about the desperation of the left than anything else.

But your misogynistic retort is noted. Why you feel the need to use misogynistic replies instead of just disagreeing or explaining your 'point' is beyond me.

wow. Me? Misogynistic? Coming from YOU - who doesn't understand that what Christie said was is about a misogynistic as you can get? :lol:


wowza!~

I don't 'understand' it because it is not true. It is subjective - open to interpretation. You read it one way. I read it another. However, referring to females as 'chicks' is not open to interpretation. It is misogynistic. Simple.... and yet apparently above your intellectual pay grade.
 
wow. Me? Misogynistic? Coming from YOU - who doesn't understand that what Christie said was is about a misogynistic as you can get? :lol:


wowza!~

I don't 'understand' it because it is not true. It is subjective - open to interpretation. You read it one way. I read it another. However, referring to females as 'chicks' is not open to interpretation. It is misogynistic. Simple.... and yet apparently above your intellectual pay grade.

Referring to females as "chicks" is the same as referring to males as "dudes," but again I don't think you get outside much so I'm not surprised that ypou think it's "misogynistic," lol wow.

she calls herself a "*****".

and a "girl".
 
wow. Me? Misogynistic? Coming from YOU - who doesn't understand that what Christie said was is about a misogynistic as you can get? :lol:


wowza!~

I don't 'understand' it because it is not true. It is subjective - open to interpretation. You read it one way. I read it another. However, referring to females as 'chicks' is not open to interpretation. It is misogynistic. Simple.... and yet apparently above your intellectual pay grade.

Referring to females as "chicks" is the same as referring to males as "dudes," but again I don't think you get outside much so I'm not surprised that ypou think it's "misogynistic," lol wow.

I've concluded that CG is slower on the uptake than TM. At least TM understands that Christie wasn't being conversational.
 
Intellectual honesty - I don't care that he said it. I'm not enraged. *I* wouldn't say that to a chick, albeit she WAS rude. I certainly don't expect a Governor to say shit like that - definitely thread-worthy but def. NOT "care" worthy.

If you don't know what he was talking about - you're out of touch with reality or being intellectually dishonest. Let's be blunt, like Christie was being. It's kind of tired to pretend like that, Surr'osly.

The crowd laughed for a reason, and it's not because saying "something is going to "happen" tonight" is a giggle-worthy line, get the **** real.

Except that isn't what he said, is it? No. He said - according to your OP - Something 'may', not 'will' or 'is' but 'may.... you might want to consult a dictionary as to the meaning of the word 'may'.
 
Damn! Christie is FAT!

(Hopefully above my political correctness is not offensive to anyone. I wanted to say "******* FAT")

He is not only pig looking he is pig ugly.
What a disgusting sight but what do you expect from a crisco butt that cannot walk 100 yds. Let's hope he has to take out his own idividual insurance program. It would be tragic for others to have to carry that tub of shit around.
 
wow. Me? Misogynistic? Coming from YOU - who doesn't understand that what Christie said was is about a misogynistic as you can get? :lol:


wowza!~

I don't 'understand' it because it is not true. It is subjective - open to interpretation. You read it one way. I read it another. However, referring to females as 'chicks' is not open to interpretation. It is misogynistic. Simple.... and yet apparently above your intellectual pay grade.

Referring to females as "chicks" is the same as referring to males as "dudes," but again I don't think you get outside much so I'm not surprised that ypou think it's "misogynistic," lol wow.

You don't think. Period. That's your problem - don't make it mine.
 
15th post
I don't 'understand' it because it is not true. It is subjective - open to interpretation. You read it one way. I read it another. However, referring to females as 'chicks' is not open to interpretation. It is misogynistic. Simple.... and yet apparently above your intellectual pay grade.

Referring to females as "chicks" is the same as referring to males as "dudes," but again I don't think you get outside much so I'm not surprised that ypou think it's "misogynistic," lol wow.

I've concluded that CG is slower on the uptake than TM. At least TM understands that Christie wasn't being conversational.
Ouch! :lol:
 
Chris Christie: "It's None of Your Business... That's it." - YouTube

Gotta love it.

It's none of that woman's business..but Matt Laurer? Sure..I tells ya..

I thought he (Christie) made good sense in this video tbh.

Made good sense of what? He tells a private citizen where his children go is a private matter but goes around the talk show circuit explaining exactly where is children go and why they go there.

It's a fine example of Christie's duplicity and his low regard for the ordinary person. Much like what you started this thread over.
 
Back
Top Bottom