Are you claiming that the unemployment rate is lower because it conforms to Your mythos?It is your understanding that is fallacious. Fallacy is all you have.Not true. Seattle and San Francisco both experienced the same phenomena. That phenomena must happen, due to the monopsony effect of statutory wage laws.And without the wealth in the area, it would not be possible to go that high that fast. Like I've said multiple times, if raising the MW had no negative effect on jobs, we could just raise it to $100/hr and eliminate poverty.
We can't, thus raising the MW does have a negative effect on jobs. It is then only a question of how much effect and if any positives might outweigh the negatives. You, however, are so extremely dogmatic that you will not acknowledge this but will continue pretending the rest of the country is as wealthy as Seattle and will continue spouting your nonsense. Surprise me, and post something rational.
If you maintain what I said is not true, then you must believe we could eliminate poverty by raising the MW to $100/hr. And you think you don't post fallacies. Once again, your dogmatism has painted you into the same corner you end up in every time you try to talk about the MW and jobs. Next up is a series of mumbles about a few favorite meaningless phrases then you disappear for a while, only to start all over again in a few weeks.
Correction: fallacy is all I see in your posts. See, once again, you're just going to keep insisting that you're right with no effort to back up anything you say. So, try real hard to convince me that we can eliminate poverty by raising the MW to $100/hr. Try.
Monopsony explains it. Government is the single agency responsible.
Come on, try. You're not trying yet. Convince me.