Chicago democrats…supporting gun crime again…they end police foot pursuits…what could go wrong?

I’m perfectly good with mandatory Drug tests with every firearm purchase ( And kick back 4473 Form if they fail due to Pot or SSRIs also along with other illegal drugs
 
All guns used belonged to a "law abiding citizen" at one time. Either they were stolen, sold or borrowed. That's why you need to hold the gun makers and sellers responsible.



I'm perfectly good with that. I am also for mandetory medication orders. You stay on your pills or you go back to the loony hatch.

You don't hold a car manufacturer responsible when someone steals a car, so your attempted point is retarded.
 
When you have a gun industry that floods our streets with guns and refuse to hold it accountable for all the people they kill, you can't whine that a 13 year old eventually gets one.
We can point out when an Illegal or eMe or MS13 or EDP gets one
 
You don't hold a car manufacturer responsible when someone steals a car, so your attempted point is retarded.

Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.

Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.


So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.

Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.
 
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.

Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.


So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.

Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.

Actually anyone CAN have a car, shown by the number of idiots with licenses.

If the store sold to a known straw buyer that's a federal crime and you go after the gun dealer and the purchaser.

Suing the manufacturers is just a way to try to get no one to make guns, i.e. and end run around the 2nd amendment.


Stop trying to be slick, it isn't working.
 
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.

Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.


So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.

Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.

No……you hold the driver of the car responsible ……

You arrest the straw buyer because the gun store did its job….it ran a mandatory Federal Background check for every gun purchase…..the gun store broke no law….

Sadly, the democrat party prosecutor will either not press charges against the straw buyer or will give them an insanely low sentence……

The baby mommas, grandmothers, mothers and sisters who straw buy guns for their gang banger family member often do so under threat of violence….you idiot.
 
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.

Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.


So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.

Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.

And leftist asshat that you are, you are just greasy with sweat thinking about the opportunity to use legal warfare against every business in the country if you are ever allowed to sue gun makers and gun stores when a 3rd party uses their guns for crime……..

That is the truth…..

Car makers had better use their lobbyists against the attacks on gun makers…because they will be next…..
 
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.

Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.


So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.

Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.

So, if it's proven that the majority of vehicular fatalities are caused by males age 18-21 driving Fords, you would have no problem banning 18-12 year old males from owning Fords?
 
So, if it's proven that the majority of vehicular fatalities are caused by males age 18-21 driving Fords, you would have no problem banning 18-12 year old males from owning Fords?


Actually, knowing joe and other leftists...they don't want people to own cars....they want the plebes forced to take buses and trains.......so no, he wouldn't have a problem with that....but first......the guns....they need to get rid of the guns....
 
Suing the manufacturers is just a way to try to get no one to make guns, i.e. and end run around the 2nd amendment.

Or it's getting the industry to act RESPONSIBLY. Just like every other industry has to.

It's not that theymake guns that's the problem, it's that they make them so damned easy to get.

And leftist asshat that you are, you are just greasy with sweat thinking about the opportunity to use legal warfare against every business in the country if you are ever allowed to sue gun makers and gun stores when a 3rd party uses their guns for crime……..

Quite the contrary... the gun is a good target because it facilitates crimes and the gun industry is so damned irresponsible in who they sell to.

Every other industry goes well out of its way to promote responsible use of their products, which is why every product has a ton of legal disclaimers.
 
Or it's getting the industry to act RESPONSIBLY. Just like every other industry has to.

It's not that theymake guns that's the problem, it's that they make them so damned easy to get.



Quite the contrary... the gun is a good target because it facilitates crimes and the gun industry is so damned irresponsible in who they sell to.

Every other industry goes well out of its way to promote responsible use of their products, which is why every product has a ton of legal disclaimers.


The gun industry is one of the most responsible industries in the country...they have to be...shitheads like you are trying to destroy them.....

The gun industry sells a product........if someone uses that legal product for a crime...you want to set them free.....you are the problem, not the gun makers.

List one gun company that encourages breaking the law with their guns....please, we will wait.....

Meanwhile, Americans use their legal guns, made by these gun companies, 1.1 million times a year to save lives, according to the Centers for Disease control.......to stop rapes, robberies, murders, beatings, stabbings, and yes, even mass public shootings......or 1.5 million times a year according to the Centers for Disease Control....or 2.5 million times a year according to the most indepth research by Gary Kleck..
 
List one gun company that encourages breaking the law with their guns....please, we will wait.....

1656150317959.png


Meanwhile, Americans use their legal guns, made by these gun companies, 1.1 million times a

Blah, lah, blah.... 1.1 million times and only 200 dead bodies. That doesn't pass the laugh test.
 
View attachment 662052



Blah, lah, blah.... 1.1 million times and only 200 dead bodies. That doesn't pass the laugh test.


Hey...dumb ass....where does that say go out and murder people......?

A man provides for his family, they protect their family, they help their neighbors.....you dumb ass.....
 
Or it's getting the industry to act RESPONSIBLY. Just like every other industry has to.

It's not that theymake guns that's the problem, it's that they make them so damned easy to get.



Quite the contrary... the gun is a good target because it facilitates crimes and the gun industry is so damned irresponsible in who they sell to.

Every other industry goes well out of its way to promote responsible use of their products, which is why every product has a ton of legal disclaimers.

Kind of like California's AG office that just released the address of everyone with CCW permit?

The gun industry sells to licensed firearm dealers. How is that irresponsible?

Car dealers don't need a federal license.
 
Kind of like California's AG office that just released the address of everyone with CCW permit?

The gun industry sells to licensed firearm dealers. How is that irresponsible?

Because some of those dealers work out of their homes, and no one is vetting them...

So again, let's allow gun victims to sue the gun makers and sellers, and you'd be AMAZED how quickly they clean up their acts.
 
Because some of those dealers work out of their homes, and no one is vetting them...

So again, let's allow gun victims to sue the gun makers and sellers, and you'd be AMAZED how quickly they clean up their acts.
:link:
 
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.

Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.


So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.

Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.


The car manufacturers sell to dealerships.......so they have no connection to the actual buyer...just like gun makers...you dumb ass.....

If they sold guns to the same buyer, that buyer passed the Federally mandated background check...the gun store did nothing wrong....

When that straw buyer is captured and released by democrat party prosecutors, that is where the problem it.....not with the guys who obeyed all the laws.
 
The car manufacturers sell to dealerships.......so they have no connection to the actual buyer...just like gun makers...you dumb ass.....

Again, do you really want to treat guns like cars? Fine. Let's have inspections, licensing, registrations, inspections and a large police force regulating their use.

(Psst.. this is the part where you whine, 'THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID I CAN HAVE A GUN!!!!"
 
Again, do you really want to treat guns like cars? Fine. Let's have inspections, licensing, registrations, inspections and a large police force regulating their use.

(Psst.. this is the part where you whine, 'THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID I CAN HAVE A GUN!!!!"


They inspect guns, and if they are actually mechanically defective, you can return them, if they hurt someone due to their defect, you can sue the gun maker.......

Licensing, and registration are unConstitutional......

Felons do not have to register the illegal guns they own......per the Haynes v United States supreme court ruling, in that requiring a criminal to register their illegal gun is a violation of their 5th amendment Right against self incrimination...

Licensing is also useless, because criminals cannot buy, own or carry guns, hence they can't register guns...

Licensing is against the Constitution.....

The police already regulate their use...if you are a felon, caught with a gun, you can be arrested and jailed....if you use a gun for a crime, you can already be arrested and jailed....
 

Forum List

Back
Top