I’m perfectly good with mandatory Drug tests with every firearm purchase ( And kick back 4473 Form if they fail due to Pot or SSRIs also along with other illegal drugs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All guns used belonged to a "law abiding citizen" at one time. Either they were stolen, sold or borrowed. That's why you need to hold the gun makers and sellers responsible.
I'm perfectly good with that. I am also for mandetory medication orders. You stay on your pills or you go back to the loony hatch.
We can point out when an Illegal or eMe or MS13 or EDP gets oneWhen you have a gun industry that floods our streets with guns and refuse to hold it accountable for all the people they kill, you can't whine that a 13 year old eventually gets one.
You don't hold a car manufacturer responsible when someone steals a car, so your attempted point is retarded.
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.
Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.
Tennessee appeals court rules a person leaving keys in vehicle can be held responsible for a car thief's crash
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A Tennessee appeals court has ruled that a person can be held responsible for a car thief's crash if the keys were left in the vehicle.Thewww.timesnews.net
So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.
Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.
Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.
Tennessee appeals court rules a person leaving keys in vehicle can be held responsible for a car thief's crash
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A Tennessee appeals court has ruled that a person can be held responsible for a car thief's crash if the keys were left in the vehicle.Thewww.timesnews.net
So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.
Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.
Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.
Tennessee appeals court rules a person leaving keys in vehicle can be held responsible for a car thief's crash
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A Tennessee appeals court has ruled that a person can be held responsible for a car thief's crash if the keys were left in the vehicle.Thewww.timesnews.net
So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.
Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.
Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.
Tennessee appeals court rules a person leaving keys in vehicle can be held responsible for a car thief's crash
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A Tennessee appeals court has ruled that a person can be held responsible for a car thief's crash if the keys were left in the vehicle.Thewww.timesnews.net
So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.
Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.
So, if it's proven that the majority of vehicular fatalities are caused by males age 18-21 driving Fords, you would have no problem banning 18-12 year old males from owning Fords?
Suing the manufacturers is just a way to try to get no one to make guns, i.e. and end run around the 2nd amendment.
And leftist asshat that you are, you are just greasy with sweat thinking about the opportunity to use legal warfare against every business in the country if you are ever allowed to sue gun makers and gun stores when a 3rd party uses their guns for crime……..
Or it's getting the industry to act RESPONSIBLY. Just like every other industry has to.
It's not that theymake guns that's the problem, it's that they make them so damned easy to get.
Quite the contrary... the gun is a good target because it facilitates crimes and the gun industry is so damned irresponsible in who they sell to.
Every other industry goes well out of its way to promote responsible use of their products, which is why every product has a ton of legal disclaimers.
List one gun company that encourages breaking the law with their guns....please, we will wait.....
Meanwhile, Americans use their legal guns, made by these gun companies, 1.1 million times a
View attachment 662052
Blah, lah, blah.... 1.1 million times and only 200 dead bodies. That doesn't pass the laugh test.
Or it's getting the industry to act RESPONSIBLY. Just like every other industry has to.
It's not that theymake guns that's the problem, it's that they make them so damned easy to get.
Quite the contrary... the gun is a good target because it facilitates crimes and the gun industry is so damned irresponsible in who they sell to.
Every other industry goes well out of its way to promote responsible use of their products, which is why every product has a ton of legal disclaimers.
Kind of like California's AG office that just released the address of everyone with CCW permit?
The gun industry sells to licensed firearm dealers. How is that irresponsible?
Because some of those dealers work out of their homes, and no one is vetting them...
So again, let's allow gun victims to sue the gun makers and sellers, and you'd be AMAZED how quickly they clean up their acts.
Um, that's because the auto manufacturers just don't let anyone have a car. You have to be licensed, insured and registered to drive that car off the lot.
Actually, we do hold people responsible for recklessly making cars available.
Tennessee appeals court rules a person leaving keys in vehicle can be held responsible for a car thief's crash
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A Tennessee appeals court has ruled that a person can be held responsible for a car thief's crash if the keys were left in the vehicle.Thewww.timesnews.net
So if someone is killed by a stolen gun, and you find out that the gun store has sold dozens of guns to the same straw buyer who reports them all "stolen", I'm all for letting a civil court sort it out.
Again- RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS PRACTICES.
The car manufacturers sell to dealerships.......so they have no connection to the actual buyer...just like gun makers...you dumb ass.....
Again, do you really want to treat guns like cars? Fine. Let's have inspections, licensing, registrations, inspections and a large police force regulating their use.
(Psst.. this is the part where you whine, 'THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID I CAN HAVE A GUN!!!!"