Charlie Kirk's black supporters

DStar777

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
1,022
Reaction score
846
Points
1,938
Location
PA, USA


Did you watch the whole video? If not, don't comment.

So some of you think he's a racist? Would these black people support him if he was?
So you think these black people are too stupid to recognize a racist?
.. or..
Do you think they are secretly white supremicists disguising themselves as black people?

I'm leaning towards #2 since you also think men can disguise themselves as women and play women's sports.
 
There were Jews who supported Hitler, too. So what? You found a dozen token black people out of millions.

Good for you.
You are right, George Soros for example, turned on his own people and helped the National Socialist send them to death camps. Now he's a big donor to the Demafascsit party.

With that said, "token" is a racist dog whistle....not surprised to see you use it.
 
That is a hoax debunked long, long ago.

He was nine years old, dipshit.

Try to catch up.

No, he was 14, and fully capable of understanding what he was doing collaborating with the Third Reich.

They should have hung him with the other Nazis at Nuremberg, the world would be a better place today.
 
giphy.gif
 
There were Jews who supported Hitler, too. So what? You found a dozen token black people out of millions.

Good for you.
What a peculiar take. You are confusing timelines. What someone would support prior to a leaders true intentions being known is far different than supporting someone once they learned the reality of their evil ambitions.

From what I have read/viewed prior to Hitlers rise is that Jews were viewed very positively in Germany. They were important contributors to their success.

It is evidence of how weak human beings are in the face of irrational fears. Think of covid in our time as a crude comparison.

For example, if people knew about the concentration camps and the desire for war that Hitler had, he would not have won the election. When the war ended, American soldiers brought German citizens to the concentration camps to force them to witness first hand what was going on, people were leaving with uncontrolled crying, some vomited, others became weak and nearly fainted.

There is a reason these camps were held in far away places in the sticks, hundreds of miles from prying eyes.

When two men escaped the camps and shared their story with the Jewish community they weren't believed at first. Who would believe such horrors? It wasn't until their account was shared with the British that the first reports of concentration camps were publicly made if I remember correctly. Even the British hesitated to issue the report because they couldn't confirm the accounts. Perhaps someone said "just release the story, at worst it would be good for war-time propaganda" at a time in which citizens needed to rise to defend against Germany.

No Jew supported Hitler once aware of what he was doing. Very few Germans would either. Only the most indoctrinated German would and they would not have been indoctrinated until after Hitler won so it it was a series of linear events.

Anyone supporting Kirk would have done so from a place of information I presume. I didn't listen much to him but some suggest he was open minded to debate which I am too so I would at least agree with him there. If Atheists of people of different backgrounds were supporters of him, why would that be a bad thing?
 
Last edited:
There were Jews who supported Hitler, too. So what? You found a dozen token black people out of millions.

Good for you.
And they still do as there are more Jews who vote for the DNC than the RNC.

Well said.

Say, have you killed those 7 million Zionists yet so Hamas can have their little sovereign country yet?
 


Did you watch the whole video? If not, don't comment.

So some of you think he's a racist? Would these black people support him if he was?
So you think these black people are too stupid to recognize a racist?
.. or..
Do you think they are secretly white supremicists disguising themselves as black people?

I'm leaning towards #2 since you also think men can disguise themselves as women and play women's sports.

Nobody has to watch that video to be able to comment about how disingenuous the OP is. Let's not try using a few blacks to deny the truth about Charlie Kirk.

There have always been sellouts.

Here is an example from history

1758208481377.webp


This is Isiah Montgomery. He is a black man who voted against giving blacks the right to vote during Reconstruction. Using today's right-wing "logic" it would be said that blacks did not want t vote.

Denmark Vesey organized a slave revolt. It was going to be a massive attack. Another black person alerted a plantation owner about the attacks, and Vesey was executed. Using today's right-wing "logic", blacks liked slavery.

During his presidential campaign, George Wallace had 3 percent support among blacks. Using today's right-wing "logic", George Wallace wasn't racist because 3 percent of the black population supported him.

Today, there are blacks like Jesse Peterson who call for white History Month, or Rev. James Manning, live human forms of Uncle Ruckus.

So a video with a few blacks who like Charlie Kirk does not mean Kirk was not a racist. What it does reveal is the internalized racism and low self-esteem of the blacks in that video.
 
Last edited:


Did you watch the whole video? If not, don't comment.

So some of you think he's a racist? Would these black people support him if he was?
So you think these black people are too stupid to recognize a racist?
.. or..
Do you think they are secretly white supremicists disguising themselves as black people?

I'm leaning towards #2 since you also think men can disguise themselves as women and play women's sports.

**** that racist asshole
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
So you think these black people are too stupid to recognize a racist?
Maybe they are unaware of the racist things he said. Like....."If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified."

"If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."
 
Maybe they are unaware of the racist things he said. Like....."If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified."
Why don't you challenge the logic of his statement instead of labeling him a racist? If a program specifically includes certain people who are otherwise unqualified, it is entirely logical to wonder whether a person was admitted under those conditions and, by definition, less qualified than others who were qualified. Do you also consider statistics to be racist?
 
15th post


Did you watch the whole video? If not, don't comment.

So some of you think he's a racist? Would these black people support him if he was?
So you think these black people are too stupid to recognize a racist?
.. or..
Do you think they are secretly white supremicists disguising themselves as black people?

I'm leaning towards #2 since you also think men can disguise themselves as women and play women's sports.

paid actors.
 
Why don't you challenge the logic of his statement instead of labeling him a racist? If a program specifically includes certain people who are otherwise unqualified, it is entirely logical to wonder whether a person was admitted under those conditions and, by definition, less qualified than others who were qualified. Do you also consider statistics to be racist?
Because he was a racist. There was no logic. Assuming no whites are ever unqualified and that you can only question blacks who are in college or on jobs relative to qualifications is racist. Don't you understand that? Statistics? Statistics show that whites commit the most crimes, so what statistics does Kirk present if he only talks about one crime when he says blacks are criminals?

Furthermore, detailed research of that ONE statistic showed that less than 1 percent of the population is committing murder, and less than 1 percent of blacks are committing murder. So again, this claim is racist judging by the STATISTICS!

Based on what YOU say here, it is entirely logical to say all whites are where they are today because of the government. I mean, if government programs specifically excluded people for most of 2.5 centuries, it is entirely logical to wonder whether all persons who lived under those conditions and their descendants benefited from government policy.
 
Why don't you challenge the logic of his statement instead of labeling him a racist? If a program specifically includes certain people who are otherwise unqualified, it is entirely logical to wonder whether a person was admitted under those conditions and, by definition, less qualified than others who were qualified. Do you also consider statistics to be racist?

The left considers all math racist.
 
Back
Top Bottom