Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University

No, he listed 4 groups.

Please re read and start over. Thanks.
You should look at the post you responded to. It referenced only one group.

Post your credit card data and for a fee, I will proofread your posts and help you avoid being such a complete buffoon.
 
Within days of Trump winning in 2016 a Democrat went public holding a bloody beheaded Trump head. THAT is who Democrats are. Ignore what Democrats say, pay close attention to what they do. Democrats slip up and tell us who they truly are on a regular basis because they HATE having to hide it.
They aren't hiding it any more.
Trump didn't cause the hate in the Democrats' hearts, he exposed it.
 
Oops, that is a a fallacy.

To say someone is likely a democrat doesnt mean they are then likely transgender. In fact, the opposite is true. Its simple math.

You made the inverse error. Whoopsie.

Let's try again.

There is a correct answer.

Person of color. Transgender.

Why likely one of those?

Think.
"Person of color. Transgender."

Don't make the thread about you. Darlin'
 
Right, he said it was totally worth it.

Irrelevant. He didn't frame it as "sacrifices" which means DR.P is the one doing gymnastics here, not me.
I don't think think that's the awesome defense of his beliefs that you think it is.

It is if you take it in the context of everything else he said. He also pointed out in that same video that 50,000 (current numbers are around 40,000) people a year are killed in auto accidents. But apparently, you, Dr.Phosphorus, myself and everyone on this board think 40 to 50 thousand auto deaths a year (roughly a thousand of those being children) are worth it to have vehicles.
And while you're clutching your pearls over insensitive comments about Kirk, maybe take a moment to consider how Kirk's comments made the parents of dead children feel.
When you're done clutching your own pearls, take a moment to consider how Kirk's death made his children feel.
 
"Person of color. Transgender."

Don't make the thread about you. Darlin'
Tantrum time already? Poor Hollie. How frustrating it must be not to grasp and understand a converstaion in simple English, the only language you know.
 
It was indeed REASONABLE to believe that if a prominent conservative was assassinated, it was someone who was opposed to them and their beliefs.
This isn't hard.
And yet your track record of being incorrect remains unbroken.

I hope you don't bet on football, for your family's sake.
 
Tantrum time already? Poor Hollie. How frustrating it must be not to grasp and understand a converstaion in simple English, the only language you know.

How frustrating for you to know that you have lost it all: politically, the culture, everything.

Just saw a high school bus driver saying that the only thing the kids are talking about is Charlie Kirk....and it's all POSITIVE, and they're heartbroken.

You lost for generations. No one deserves it more
 
make who? The kid?

We know NOTHING about the kid's political affiliation other than he hated Kirk so much he assassinated him.

And somehow that makes him MAGA to you.

Democrats are poor at logic, you keep proving that.

You keep going with your partisan hack instincts and they're predictably full of shit.

You and the man you worship are always making incorrect assumptions.

You're wrong so much that it just seems normal to you.
 
15th post
Tantrum time already? Poor Hollie. How frustrating it must be not to grasp and understand a converstaion in simple English, the only language you know.
Frustration time so soon? How terrible you don't understand that responding to a comment suggests that you use the "quote" function to reference the correct comment.

How frustrating it must be for you to be unable to understand that responding to a comment not a part of the quote you posted makes you something of a buffoon.
 
You and the man you worship are always making incorrect assumptions.

You're wrong so much that it just seems normal to you.
I have no idea what you're trying to say so I'm just going to skip over you.
 
Oops, that is a a fallacy.

To say someone is likely a democrat doesnt mean they are then likely transgender. In fact, the opposite is true. Its simple math.

You made the inverse error. Whoopsie.

Let's try again.

There is a correct answer.

Person of color. Transgender.

Why likely one of those?

Think.

Approximately 10% of trans individuals identify as Republicans compared to around 45% of the general population.
40% say they are Dimocrats, and the remaining claim independent or something else. The latter two are highly unlikely to be affiliated with conservative leanings.

As for the 'person of color', the only reason I would mention them at all, is that in this case here, where a conservative was killed, the killer is MOST likely someone who is NOT a fellow conservative, and a person of color is MORE likely aligned with the opposition.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom