The United Nations laid the foundation for the Charlie Hebdo slaughter in Paris. Go back to 2010:
Now move forward to 2011:
The last time I looked the First Amendment still protected a free press; nevertheless, you now know why Taqiyya the Liar forbids the American media from publishing cartoons that pokes fun at Islam. The fact is that Taqiyya’s prohibition gives media cowards cover for NOT publishing cartoons that Muslims might offensive to Mohammad. Not so with Jesus Christ.
Incidentally, thanks to tax deductible advertising dollars press barons have more money than Allah, but not a one of them has the courage shown by the Charlie Hebdo staff in Paris, nor will one press baron pay armed guards prepared to shoot down terrorists. Can you imagine how the Chicago sewer rat would react if private guards defended the First Amendment!
And what a twist of fate it would be if Muslim terrorists attacked Madison Avenue ad agencies when they cannot invade well-armed newspapers and television stations. Hell, who needs the United Nations? Achmed the Dead Terrorist might end up tearing down the whole damn government structure in order to kill anyone who laughs at Mohamad.
The United Nations wants to criminalize religious heresy, provided that those making the claim are Islamists.
Later this month, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on the nonbinding Defamation of Religions Resolution, which would give international sanction to the type of religious persecution commonplace in Muslim-majority countries. Superficially, the resolution contains feel-good human rights language routinely churned out by the U.N. The intent of this resolution, however, is to give sanction to repressive mechanisms that primarily Muslim countries use to stifle critiques of their state-sanctioned sects. This lends international legitimacy to criminal penalties against people who exercise their freedom of worship.
Later this month, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on the nonbinding Defamation of Religions Resolution, which would give international sanction to the type of religious persecution commonplace in Muslim-majority countries. Superficially, the resolution contains feel-good human rights language routinely churned out by the U.N. The intent of this resolution, however, is to give sanction to repressive mechanisms that primarily Muslim countries use to stifle critiques of their state-sanctioned sects. This lends international legitimacy to criminal penalties against people who exercise their freedom of worship.
EDITORIAL: The United (Muslim) Nations?
U.N. resolution gives special protection to Islamist regimes
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - The Washington Times - Friday, December 10, 2010
EDITORIAL The United Muslim Nations - Washington Times
U.N. resolution gives special protection to Islamist regimes
By THE WASHINGTON TIMES - The Washington Times - Friday, December 10, 2010
EDITORIAL The United Muslim Nations - Washington Times
Now move forward to 2011:
Thanks to the Obama Administration – Criticism of Islamic violence will be forbidden.
Look for this new resolution to be used against anyone who dares criticize Islamic violence. Why else would the OIC and Obama push it?
By the way… There have been 18,161 deadly attacks in the name of Islam since 9-11.
XXXXX
Look for this new resolution to be used against anyone who dares criticize Islamic violence. Why else would the OIC and Obama push it?
By the way… There have been 18,161 deadly attacks in the name of Islam since 9-11.
Obama Administration Pushes UN Resolution That Bans Criticism of Islamic Radicalism
Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 21, 2011, 5:06 AM
Obama Administration Pushes UN Resolution That Bans Criticism of Islamic Radicalism The Gateway Pundit
Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, December 21, 2011, 5:06 AM
Obama Administration Pushes UN Resolution That Bans Criticism of Islamic Radicalism The Gateway Pundit
The last time I looked the First Amendment still protected a free press; nevertheless, you now know why Taqiyya the Liar forbids the American media from publishing cartoons that pokes fun at Islam. The fact is that Taqiyya’s prohibition gives media cowards cover for NOT publishing cartoons that Muslims might offensive to Mohammad. Not so with Jesus Christ.
Incidentally, thanks to tax deductible advertising dollars press barons have more money than Allah, but not a one of them has the courage shown by the Charlie Hebdo staff in Paris, nor will one press baron pay armed guards prepared to shoot down terrorists. Can you imagine how the Chicago sewer rat would react if private guards defended the First Amendment!
And what a twist of fate it would be if Muslim terrorists attacked Madison Avenue ad agencies when they cannot invade well-armed newspapers and television stations. Hell, who needs the United Nations? Achmed the Dead Terrorist might end up tearing down the whole damn government structure in order to kill anyone who laughs at Mohamad.