Carlsons 'F You' response is a good sign for conservatives

[Deno]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Back at you Tard......

And here I am, defending Carlson's freedom of expression without consequence.

Too complicated for ya?


.

Evidently you aren’t that bright…..

I was agreeing with you….

Like you, I think It’s good for you Tards to Quack so we can see where you stand.

 

[iceberg]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Yep. You have a right to free speech.

What you don't have is the right to be free of the consequences for that speech.

Those "consequences" are not required. They are a choice.

You could just let people say what they have to say without issuing "consequences" if they "offend" you.

That's the spirit of freedom of expression. "Consequences" are a perversion of the concept.

aw - then she should know i care deeply about - HER!

 

[Mac1958]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Back at you Tard......

And here I am, defending Carlson's freedom of expression without consequence.

Too complicated for ya?


.

Evidently you aren’t that bright…..

I was agreeing with you….

Like you, I think It’s good for you Tards to Quack so we can see where you stand.

Yeah. In your world, "tard" is a compliment.

Nice try, winger.
.

 

[Deno]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Back at you Tard......

And here I am, defending Carlson's freedom of expression without consequence.

Too complicated for ya?


.

Evidently you aren’t that bright…..

I was agreeing with you….

Like you, I think It’s good for you Tards to Quack so we can see where you stand.

Yeah. In your world, "tard" is a compliment.

Nice try, winger.
.

No problem Tard....

 

[LoneLaugher]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Yep. You have a right to free speech.

What you don't have is the right to be free of the consequences for that speech.

Those "consequences" are not required. They are a choice.

You could just let people say what they have to say without issuing "consequences" if they "offend" you.

That's the spirit of freedom of expression. "Consequences" are a perversion of the concept.

Where do you draw the line? Please give us an example where words deserve to be met with consequences.

Thanks.

 

[Rustic]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Yep. You have a right to free speech.

What you don't have is the right to be free of the consequences for that speech.

Those "consequences" are not required. They are a choice.

You could just let people say what they have to say without issuing "consequences" if they "offend" you.

That's the spirit of freedom of expression. "Consequences" are a perversion of the concept.

Where do you draw the line? Please give us an example where words deserve to be met with consequences.

Thanks.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Yep. You have a right to free speech.

What you don't have is the right to be free of the consequences for that speech.

Those "consequences" are not required. They are a choice.

You could just let people say what they have to say without issuing "consequences" if they "offend" you.

That's the spirit of freedom of expression. "Consequences" are a perversion of the concept.

Where do you draw the line? Please give us an example where words deserve to be met with consequences.

Thanks.

Bump.

 

[Theowl32]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Creepy ****** hypocrite

 

[LoneLaugher]

Just the latest example of why freedom of expression is so terribly important.

Let Tucker Carlson say what he has to say. Let him say what he said about women and Iraqis and gays or whatever the list currently is.

Then let those who agree with him stand with him proudly. So we can all see who they are for future reference. I want to know who these people are, where they are, what they are thinking, and who agrees with them.

If this is what today's GOP is, then everyone should know.
.

Yep. You have a right to free speech.

What you don't have is the right to be free of the consequences for that speech.

Those "consequences" are not required. They are a choice.

You could just let people say what they have to say without issuing "consequences" if they "offend" you.

That's the spirit of freedom of expression. "Consequences" are a perversion of the concept.

Where do you draw the line? Please give us an example where words deserve to be met with consequences.

Thanks.

Bump.

You're not going to get honesty out of the resident sanctimony troll...be real.

The silence is telling, no?