Can't Figure Out MSNBC

DoggieDaddy

Member
May 27, 2016
91
20
21
Of all the News Media Hosts Joe Scarborugh seems to see things a tad bit on the Conservative Side! I always thought hosts were to be Non-Partisan and handle both sides of a Political Discussion...we all know Fox News, CNN...Bill O'Reilly!
Now Chris Matthews is just the opposite, I think he's fair...Rachel Maddow is probably very intuitive and the best of the lot.
But don't we all think the same...this is Joe Scarboroughs Forum on Joe Scarborough.
MSNBC is getting some bad press lately!:blowup::desk:
 
Yo, you talk like a Typical Mini Wannabe Socialist Puppet!!!

"GTP"
91b06da4c60719f4e677fb8e9ba09368.jpg
 
Of all the News Media Hosts Joe Scarborugh seems to see things a tad bit on the Conservative Side! I always thought hosts were to be Non-Partisan and handle both sides of a Political Discussion...we all know Fox News, CNN...Bill O'Reilly!
Now Chris Matthews is just the opposite, I think he's fair...Rachel Maddow is probably very intuitive and the best of the lot.
But don't we all think the same...this is Joe Scarboroughs Forum on Joe Scarborough.
MSNBC is getting some bad press lately!:blowup::desk:

MessNBC has had an identity crisis since letting Keith go a decade or so ago. Don't want to be seen as overly liberal but sort of middle of the road......They have been trying without success to replicate Fox viewing numbers and have failed miserably in doing so. They have lost a lot of viewers to CNN and until they decide a platform, their numbers will continue to slide. Joe and Rachel and sometimes Chris, can not carry an entire network. They hire former spokesmen and paid analyst as news anchors, give them their own shows and then tank em after a few months....its really sad over there, that's why people stop watching.

So the bad press they get, its deserved
 
Joe Scarborough is an outstanding Conservative and a patriotic American who works for an evil, corrupt television network, PMSNBC. News networks are supposed to report the news, not create and push their own agenda, which is to excuse, cover for and worship the Clintons, Obamas and every Progressive Liberal Democrat puke that infests the government. As for Rachel and Chris, they are the type of tripe I would gladly waterboard until the bubbles stopped.
 
Joe Scarborough is an outstanding Conservative and a patriotic American who works for an evil, corrupt television network, PMSNBC. News networks are supposed to report the news, not create and push their own agenda, which is to excuse, cover for and worship the Clintons, Obamas and every Progressive Liberal Democrat puke that infests the government. As for Rachel and Chris, they are the type of tripe I would gladly waterboard until the bubbles stopped.

MSNBC isn't a "news" network. Far as I know it never has been. That model belongs to another age I'm afraid.
 
Yo, you talk like a Typical Mini Wannabe Socialist Puppet!!!

"GTP"

Irony post from a baboon who starts every post with "Yo", runs a homoerotic movie meme avatar and speaks not so much in coherent sentences as ... grunts.
 
Joe Scarborough is an outstanding Conservative and a patriotic American who works for an evil, corrupt television network, PMSNBC. News networks are supposed to report the news, not create and push their own agenda, which is to excuse, cover for and worship the Clintons, Obamas and every Progressive Liberal Democrat puke that infests the government. As for Rachel and Chris, they are the type of tripe I would gladly waterboard until the bubbles stopped.
And you can say all that shit with a straight face, now can you? Fox news is horrible, Joe and that manican he calls Micha are horrible as well.
 
MSNBC, FOX, CNN are not news outlets. They are propaganda sites that use entertainment as a sort of fake news hook.

I have noticed as these kind of sites grew in popularity the public became more and more uninformed and misinformed.

Rachel Maddow was great during the days of Air America. But since enjoying the big bucks on cable TV she's devolved to a Democratic establishment cheer leader.

All this bodes ill for the future of our country.
 
MSNBC, FOX, CNN are not news outlets. They are propaganda sites that use entertainment as a sort of fake news hook.

I have noticed as these kind of sites grew in popularity the public became more and more uninformed and misinformed.

Rachel Maddow was great during the days of Air America. But since enjoying the big bucks on cable TV she's devolved to a Democratic establishment cheer leader.

All this bodes ill for the future of our country.

It's all News Theater now. Fox Noise started that. When Fox arrived CNN was the default anytime news source, doing actual news. But doing news is expensive. Requires flying people around, camera crews and satellite trucks, keeping foreign bureaus open, editors, all that stuff. Murdoch, who came from a tabloid rag mentality, figured he'd play down that part and make his money not with news reporters but with talking heads sitting around talking about the news -- which opens up the paramaters and lets you wander into commentary. That in turn lets you take sides and thus mine emotion... which is the dynamic that draws in viewers and keeps them there. "Coming up next we'll tell you who's out to kill you and why YOU should be afraid, but first this word for Viagra".

Attention of course is what sells ratings, which was what Murdoch was after. Ratings are irrelevant to content, but very relevant to how much profit you can make delivering eyeballs to an advertiser. Thus we get endless psychodramas about who-cares pablum like how Michael Jackson might have died and precious little on real actual usable information. An informed public is no match for the Almighty Dollar (praised be Its Holy Name).

The CNNs and MSNBCs then, to their discredit, followed suit and it all went down the sewer like rats following the pied piper. Even the Weather Channel spends its evenings not on what's going on right now but on pseudo-documentaries about somebody trapped in a car in a flood twelve years ago and how YOU could be impaled by a flying telephone pole if a hurricane were to get all the way to Dubuque.
 
Of all the News Media Hosts Joe Scarborugh seems to see things a tad bit on the Conservative Side! I always thought hosts were to be Non-Partisan and handle both sides of a Political Discussion...we all know Fox News, CNN...Bill O'Reilly!
Now Chris Matthews is just the opposite, I think he's fair...Rachel Maddow is probably very intuitive and the best of the lot.
But don't we all think the same...this is Joe Scarboroughs Forum on Joe Scarborough.
MSNBC is getting some bad press lately!:blowup::desk:
Anyone who 'can't figure out MSNBC' is probably beyond help.
 
MSNBC, FOX, CNN are not news outlets. They are propaganda sites that use entertainment as a sort of fake news hook.

I have noticed as these kind of sites grew in popularity the public became more and more uninformed and misinformed.

Rachel Maddow was great during the days of Air America. But since enjoying the big bucks on cable TV she's devolved to a Democratic establishment cheer leader.

All this bodes ill for the future of our country.

It's all News Theater now. Fox Noise started that. When Fox arrived CNN was the default anytime news source, doing actual news. But doing news is expensive. Requires flying people around, camera crews and satellite trucks, keeping foreign bureaus open, editors, all that stuff. Murdoch, who came from a tabloid rag mentality, figured he'd play down that part and make his money not with news reporters but with talking heads sitting around talking about the news -- which opens up the paramaters and lets you wander into commentary. That in turn lets you take sides and thus mine emotion... which is the dynamic that draws in viewers and keeps them there. "Coming up next we'll tell you who's out to kill you and why YOU should be afraid, but first this word for Viagra".

Attention of course is what sells ratings, which was what Murdoch was after. Ratings are irrelevant to content, but very relevant to how much profit you can make delivering eyeballs to an advertiser. Thus we get endless psychodramas about who-cares pablum like how Michael Jackson might have died and precious little on real actual usable information. An informed public is no match for the Almighty Dollar (praised be Its Holy Name).

The CNNs and MSNBCs then, to their discredit, followed suit and it all went down the sewer like rats following the pied piper. Even the Weather Channel spends its evenings not on what's going on right now but on pseudo-documentaries about somebody trapped in a car in a flood twelve years ago and how YOU could be impaled by a flying telephone pole if a hurricane were to get all the way to Dubuque.

Now that they are in the business of opinion making instead of information I wonder if the wedge issues like immigration and anti-Islamic rhetoric are a creation of the corporate media. They give a soap box to the loudest pundits who are usually wrong.
 
Of all the News Media Hosts Joe Scarborugh seems to see things a tad bit on the Conservative Side! I always thought hosts were to be Non-Partisan and handle both sides of a Political Discussion...we all know Fox News, CNN...Bill O'Reilly!
Now Chris Matthews is just the opposite, I think he's fair...Rachel Maddow is probably very intuitive and the best of the lot.
But don't we all think the same...this is Joe Scarboroughs Forum on Joe Scarborough.
MSNBC is getting some bad press lately!:blowup::desk:
Anyone who 'can't figure out MSNBC' is probably beyond help.
Yeah, you're right about that Bub!
 
MSNBC, FOX, CNN are not news outlets. They are propaganda sites that use entertainment as a sort of fake news hook.

I have noticed as these kind of sites grew in popularity the public became more and more uninformed and misinformed.

Rachel Maddow was great during the days of Air America. But since enjoying the big bucks on cable TV she's devolved to a Democratic establishment cheer leader.

All this bodes ill for the future of our country.

It's all News Theater now. Fox Noise started that. When Fox arrived CNN was the default anytime news source, doing actual news. But doing news is expensive. Requires flying people around, camera crews and satellite trucks, keeping foreign bureaus open, editors, all that stuff. Murdoch, who came from a tabloid rag mentality, figured he'd play down that part and make his money not with news reporters but with talking heads sitting around talking about the news -- which opens up the paramaters and lets you wander into commentary. That in turn lets you take sides and thus mine emotion... which is the dynamic that draws in viewers and keeps them there. "Coming up next we'll tell you who's out to kill you and why YOU should be afraid, but first this word for Viagra".

Attention of course is what sells ratings, which was what Murdoch was after. Ratings are irrelevant to content, but very relevant to how much profit you can make delivering eyeballs to an advertiser. Thus we get endless psychodramas about who-cares pablum like how Michael Jackson might have died and precious little on real actual usable information. An informed public is no match for the Almighty Dollar (praised be Its Holy Name).

The CNNs and MSNBCs then, to their discredit, followed suit and it all went down the sewer like rats following the pied piper. Even the Weather Channel spends its evenings not on what's going on right now but on pseudo-documentaries about somebody trapped in a car in a flood twelve years ago and how YOU could be impaled by a flying telephone pole if a hurricane were to get all the way to Dubuque.

Now that they are in the business of opinion making instead of information I wonder if the wedge issues like immigration and anti-Islamic rhetoric are a creation of the corporate media. They give a soap box to the loudest pundits who are usually wrong.

Whether said talking head is 'right' or 'wrong' is immaterial. Their only concern is "will they $ell?"
 

Forum List

Back
Top