Canada's gun laws...they don't keep criminals from getting guns either....

[danielpalos]

Of course they don't. Laws about anything don't keep criminals from crime, by definition.

That's not why Canada has a way-lower gun violence problem than we do. It's because Canada doesn't have the gun culture we do.

So the guns in the U.S. can fire themselves but the guns in Canada can't?

Uh yyyyyyeah sure whatever you say Hoser.

It's because they're metric.

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

What is the "per capita" gun ratio for each city?

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

 

[danielpalos]

Uh yyyyyyeah sure whatever you say Hoser.

It's because they're metric.

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

No nothing like that. It's absurd. And it's a non sequitur.

What's absurd is the excuses gun haters like you make to try and get rid of guns.

Since a gun can't fire itself, that ONLY leave a PERSON misusing it in situations. You focus on the GUN culture when it boils down to being a PEOPLE culture.

I believe in better aqueducts and better roads and more well regulated militia; we have a Second Amendment.

I believe you're a ******* cowardly idiot. Your words support that belief.

Only in right wing, national socialist fantasy. All You have is fallacy for your Cause.

 

[Conservative65]

So the guns in the U.S. can fire themselves but the guns in Canada can't?

Uh yyyyyyeah sure whatever you say Hoser.

It's because they're metric.

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

What is the "per capita" gun ratio for each city?

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

 

[Conservative65]

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

No nothing like that. It's absurd. And it's a non sequitur.

What's absurd is the excuses gun haters like you make to try and get rid of guns.

Since a gun can't fire itself, that ONLY leave a PERSON misusing it in situations. You focus on the GUN culture when it boils down to being a PEOPLE culture.

I believe in better aqueducts and better roads and more well regulated militia; we have a Second Amendment.

I believe you're a ******* cowardly idiot. Your words support that belief.

Only in right wing, national socialist fantasy. All You have is fallacy for your Cause.

Those of us on the right consider you a cowardly idiot. We've all seen your words.

Keep trolling, boy. It's all you have going for you and that isn't saying much.

 

[EverCurious]

What I see is that the lower 48 has taken on a 'soft' approach to crime and criminals. They make excuses and spout sympathy and that makes the 'risk' of criminal acts less unappealing than the 'reward' that might be gained.

Alaskans are actually in a bit of an uproar because of SB91 being passed in July 2016 (and the surge of crime in Anchorage) the bill lessens sentences and punishments for crime - Senate Bill 91: Summary of Policy Reforms | | University of Alaska Anchorage

If you look at any crime local news piece from Anchorage over the past two years, you'll find a lot of bitching about SB91 in the comments every time. Alaskan's are not happy at all - why they re-elected Dem's again is ******* beyond me. (I almost think there was some kind of fraud going on in the local elections, I was stunned considering the very vocal and very persistent outrage of like every Alaskan I know against their supporting and pushing SB91. I'm kind of hoping President Trump looking into the election will give us Alaskan's the standing we need to push for an investigation into our local elections.)

Anyway, there's been a surge in blatant violence since it's passage, hell less than a week ago, broad daylight 3 black men held up 3 separate women at gun point. One of them even had a gun in her purse but she'd been in her car at a stop sign and couldn't access it before they had a gun to her head. They caught one of the assholes and this guy is going to have a lesser sentence, 3-5 years instead of 5-8 years, as a direct result of SB91.

Criminals are stupid, but they are bright enough to recognize "opportunity" to example, lesser repercussions, less local support for police, ineffective police forces, or in Alaska's case smaller police force, etc. They use that to their advantage and when they pick their victims/targets. People need to understand that criminals will take any advantage you give them; they are give an inch take a mile types of people. That is the real "cultural" problem that America has, used to be only in the lower 48, but it's creeping in up here too.

 

[danielpalos]

Uh yyyyyyeah sure whatever you say Hoser.

It's because they're metric.

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

What is the "per capita" gun ratio for each city?

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

 

[danielpalos]

No nothing like that. It's absurd. And it's a non sequitur.

What's absurd is the excuses gun haters like you make to try and get rid of guns.

Since a gun can't fire itself, that ONLY leave a PERSON misusing it in situations. You focus on the GUN culture when it boils down to being a PEOPLE culture.

I believe in better aqueducts and better roads and more well regulated militia; we have a Second Amendment.

I believe you're a ******* cowardly idiot. Your words support that belief.

Only in right wing, national socialist fantasy. All You have is fallacy for your Cause.

Those of us on the right consider you a cowardly idiot. We've all seen your words.

Keep trolling, boy. It's all you have going for you and that isn't saying much.

cowardly idiot about what? national socialist right wingers, abandoning their positions whenever they encounter a valid argument; how "brave".

 

[Conservative65]

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

What is the "per capita" gun ratio for each city?

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

 

[Conservative65]

What's absurd is the excuses gun haters like you make to try and get rid of guns.

Since a gun can't fire itself, that ONLY leave a PERSON misusing it in situations. You focus on the GUN culture when it boils down to being a PEOPLE culture.

I believe in better aqueducts and better roads and more well regulated militia; we have a Second Amendment.

I believe you're a ******* cowardly idiot. Your words support that belief.

Only in right wing, national socialist fantasy. All You have is fallacy for your Cause.

Those of us on the right consider you a cowardly idiot. We've all seen your words.

Keep trolling, boy. It's all you have going for you and that isn't saying much.

cowardly idiot about what? national socialist right wingers, abandoning their positions whenever they encounter a valid argument; how "brave".

I've held the same position. Guns can't fire themselves yet you claim they can.

 

[danielpalos]

What is the "per capita" gun ratio for each city?

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

Of course it makes a difference. Guns don't have to shoot themselves to be dangerous.

However, I agree it is culture. The national socialist right wing, can hit targets from a distance with guns.

 

[Conservative65]

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

Of course it makes a difference. Guns don't have to shoot themselves to be dangerous.

However, I agree it is culture. The national socialist right wing, can hit targets from a distance with guns.

Since guns can't shoot themselves, the only way they are dangerous is if someone misuses them.

While I'm not national socialist, I can hit targets from a distance.

 

[danielpalos]

you are irrelevant. the law of large numbers applies.

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

Of course it makes a difference. Guns don't have to shoot themselves to be dangerous.

However, I agree it is culture. The national socialist right wing, can hit targets from a distance with guns.

Since guns can't shoot themselves, the only way they are dangerous is if someone misuses them.

While I'm not national socialist, I can hit targets from a distance. Something to keep in mind.

the unorganized militia, is Not, well regulated.

so what. how close does a person have to get, before your gun is useless?

 

[Conservative65]

I'm not the one saying a gun can fire itself. You are. That makes you a worthless, dumbass.

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

Of course it makes a difference. Guns don't have to shoot themselves to be dangerous.

However, I agree it is culture. The national socialist right wing, can hit targets from a distance with guns.

Since guns can't shoot themselves, the only way they are dangerous is if someone misuses them.

While I'm not national socialist, I can hit targets from a distance. Something to keep in mind.

the unorganized militia, is Not, well regulated.

so what. how close does a person have to get, before your gun is useless?

Why do you ask?

 

[danielpalos]

not at all; simply having several guns instead of only one; makes a difference.

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

Of course it makes a difference. Guns don't have to shoot themselves to be dangerous.

However, I agree it is culture. The national socialist right wing, can hit targets from a distance with guns.

Since guns can't shoot themselves, the only way they are dangerous is if someone misuses them.

While I'm not national socialist, I can hit targets from a distance. Something to keep in mind.

the unorganized militia, is Not, well regulated.

so what. how close does a person have to get, before your gun is useless?

Why do you ask?

You know what they say; keep your friends close but your enemies closer (to keep the artillery at bay.)

 

[Conservative65]

One or many makes no difference unless the the guns can shoot themselves. Are you still claiming that they can?

Of course it makes a difference. Guns don't have to shoot themselves to be dangerous.

However, I agree it is culture. The national socialist right wing, can hit targets from a distance with guns.

Since guns can't shoot themselves, the only way they are dangerous is if someone misuses them.

While I'm not national socialist, I can hit targets from a distance. Something to keep in mind.

the unorganized militia, is Not, well regulated.

so what. how close does a person have to get, before your gun is useless?

Why do you ask?

You know what they say; keep your friends close but your enemies closer (to keep the artillery at bay.)

You're definitely not a friend of mine. I have standards for friends to a level you'll never achieve.

 

[Pogo]

Of course they don't. Laws about anything don't keep criminals from crime, by definition.

That's not why Canada has a way-lower gun violence problem than we do. It's because Canada doesn't have the gun culture we do.

So the guns in the U.S. can fire themselves but the guns in Canada can't?

Uh yyyyyyeah sure whatever you say Hoser.

It's because they're metric.

You blame the gun culture and the amount of guns. The only way that could do what you said is if the guns to fire themselves. Are you saying that?

What is the "per capita" gun ratio for each city?

Irrelevant. Are you saying a gun can fire itself. The only way for what you asked to be relevant is if a gun can do that.

You're at this charade AGAIN?

You tried to stuff the same words into my posts too. How'd that work out for ya?

And here you go expecting different results.....