Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, the problem is this and similar lies contrived by those hostile to current Second Amendment jurisprudence, lies that make it impossible to have a rational discussion concerning which firearm regulatory measures are Constitutional and which are not.Well, see, here's the REAL problem.
Not more than a few hours after any mass shooting, the blood isn't even dry, and gun control freaks have already used the tragedy to rally support for their issue.
If they want to do that, why not post their issue in that forum? I get so sick of seeing this issue, when it is an issue that requires an amendment to the constitution.
Everyone KNOWS there will never be any where near the two thirds political majority for the will to do this. So why do they post those stupid threads? It's a waste of everyone's time.
Dedicated..........that is.
I think 1000 threads on a particular topic might indicate that a sub forum is warranted. Given that we have a handful of members who post that many gun rights threads per month in the current events and politics sub forums, the time has come.
How about it? Let's put this stuff in its own little home, shall we?
Thanks.
There's the firearm's forum.
Apparently they don't know what a "firearm" is.
Thing is, you can read one thread a month and know what all the rest of them say. Convenient, huh?
![]()
I don't know what the problem is, it's current events/news. Don't like it don't read it.
The fire arm forum is not supposed to be about the latest news/killings
I never understand liberals, just switch the channel or don't read it...why do they always want to try to censor what other people read?
We can call it Guns are Evil Forum for the OP.
I don't know what the problem is, it's current events/news. Don't like it don't read it.
The fire arm forum is not supposed to be about the latest news/killings
I never understand liberals, just switch the channel or don't read it...why do they always want to try to censor what other people read?
I don't know what the problem is, it's current events/news. Don't like it don't read it.
The fire arm forum is not supposed to be about the latest news/killings
I never understand liberals, just switch the channel or don't read it...why do they always want to try to censor what other people read?
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
I don't know what the problem is, it's current events/news. Don't like it don't read it.
The fire arm forum is not supposed to be about the latest news/killings
I never understand liberals, just switch the channel or don't read it...why do they always want to try to censor what other people read?
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
I'd probably leave out the 'gun' qualifierI don't know what the problem is, it's current events/news. Don't like it don't read it.
The fire arm forum is not supposed to be about the latest news/killings
I never understand liberals, just switch the channel or don't read it...why do they always want to try to censor what other people read?
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
Exactly my point...who's to define who the 'gun nuts' are?
And I didn't say 'many', I said 'some'.
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
Exactly my point...who's to define who the 'gun nuts' are?
And I didn't say 'many', I said 'some'.
Yes.....you did. My mistake. Can you tell me who they are?
No. Every single thought that enters the head of a gun nut is not a current event.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
Exactly my point...who's to define who the 'gun nuts' are?
And I didn't say 'many', I said 'some'.
Yes.....you did. My mistake. Can you tell me who they are?
No. A consensus would need to be reached as to what exactly a gun nutter is.
Would everyone have to take a test?
See, LL. some would consider you a gun nut merely because you own a gun.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
Exactly my point...who's to define who the 'gun nuts' are?
And I didn't say 'many', I said 'some'.
Yes.....you did. My mistake. Can you tell me who they are?
No. A consensus would need to be reached as to what exactly a gun nutter is.
Last time. Who among USMB members would say that I am a gun nut simply because I own a gun? That is not a hard question.
Many? Such as who?
Which USMB members would say that I am a gun nut merely because I own a gun?
I'd like to talk with those people.
Exactly my point...who's to define who the 'gun nuts' are?
And I didn't say 'many', I said 'some'.
Yes.....you did. My mistake. Can you tell me who they are?
No. A consensus would need to be reached as to what exactly a gun nutter is.
Last time. Who among USMB members would say that I am a gun nut simply because I own a gun? That is not a hard question.
A lot of gun banning advocates would say that you are a gun nut if you own a gun and that you are compensating for a tiny penis.![]()
Exactly my point...who's to define who the 'gun nuts' are?
And I didn't say 'many', I said 'some'.
Yes.....you did. My mistake. Can you tell me who they are?
No. A consensus would need to be reached as to what exactly a gun nutter is.
Last time. Who among USMB members would say that I am a gun nut simply because I own a gun? That is not a hard question.
A lot of gun banning advocates would say that you are a gun nut if you own a gun and that you are compensating for a tiny penis.![]()
Yeah? Who? Name one please.
Pleeeze repeat it again.I sure can
But I won't![]()