Newt Gingrich rewrites history of role in Clinton impeachment - The Plum Line - The Washington Post
Gingrich now claims that his criticism of Clinton at the time was not about personal behavior. But this is a fairly clear distortion. In reality, in the late 1990s, Gingrich played an ongoing game in which he frequently insisted that the law was his primary concern, even as he simultaneously made the case that Clintons personal conduct constituted morally reprehensible behavior.
For instance, in an article for Human Events in 1998 (via Nexis), Gingrich made the high-minded claim that impeachment was all about law and the Constitution, but then he added:
Around the world today, the institution of the presidency has been degraded to the point that it is viewed as the rough equivalent of the Jerry Springer show -- a level of disrespect and decadence that should appall every American.