Called off Iran strike, Gold, Epstein....any connection?

[CrusaderFrank]

Apparently after China unloaded 30 cargo planes worth of equipment in Iran, Trump called off the Iran Strike.

Then the metals markets crash $10 Trillion

Then Pam Bondi suddenly decides to honor the Epstein Transparency Act

Any chance the events are connected?

 

[BackAgain]

Apparently after China unloaded 30 cargo planes worth of equipment in Iran, Trump called off the Iran Strike.

Then the metals markets crash $10 Trillion

Then Pam Bondi suddenly decides to honor the Epstein Transparency Act

Any chance the events are connected?

Not seeing how.

And I also don’t agree with that 3rd bullet point. The shit had to be properly reviewed and redacted. With that many pages, such things takes time.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Apparently after China unloaded 30 cargo planes worth of equipment in Iran, Trump called off the Iran Strike.

Then the metals markets crash $10 Trillion

Then Pam Bondi suddenly decides to honor the Epstein Transparency Act

Any chance the events are connected?

 

[White 6]

Not seeing how.

And I also don’t agree with that 3rd bullet point. The shit had to be properly reviewed and redacted. With that many pages, such things takes time.

And it is said to only be up to 51%, even now. We have not heard the last of this, by any means, as the government still has not complied.

 

[BackAgain]

And it is said to only be up to 51%, even now. We have not heard the last of this, by any means, as the government still has not complied.

They are complying.

And … it takes such time as it takes. Not exactly a valid complaint.

Also, there’s this: raise your hand if you imagine that anybody “implicated” in the sordid behaviors attributed to Epstein and some of his “guests” is going to get prosecuted all this time later?

With a valid complainant and maybe with an assload of additional evidence. I don’t even care whether it’s an “old” crime. I’m all for prosecuting such miscreants, regardless of political party affiliation.

But for Christ’s sake, none of us know whether there even is a viable victim who’d want to come forward. And we sure as **** don’t know who the individuals are who accepted sexual acts from (or with) a minor.

 

[White 6]

They are complying.

And … it takes such time as it takes. Not exactly a valid complaint.

Also, there’s this: raise your hand if you imagine that anybody “implicated” in the sordid behaviors attributed to Epstein and some of his “guests” is going to get prosecuted all this time later?

With a valid complainant and maybe with an assload of additional evidence. I don’t even care whether it’s an “old” crime. I’m all for prosecuting such miscreants, regardless of political party affiliation.

But for Christ’s sake, none of us know whether there even is a viable victim who’d want to come forward. And we sure as **** don’t know who the individuals are who accepted sexual acts from (or with) a minor.

I remember when MAGA wanted them released in full. Some asshole even ran on it. Now they say any with rape allegation are redacted in full, and they are over a month late, just releasing this much, on their timetable. Some of what they released were taken down within hours. Not exactly full, timely compliance, by any means.

 

[Doc7505]

Apparently after China unloaded 30 cargo planes worth of equipment in Iran, Trump called off the Iran Strike.

Then the metals markets crash $10 Trillion

Then Pam Bondi suddenly decides to honor the Epstein Transparency Act

Any chance the events are connected?

<~~~~~~~~~~>​

You can bet your bippy on that.

 

[BackAgain]

I remember when MAGA wanted them released in full. Some asshole even ran on it. Now they say any with rape allegation are redacted in full, and they are over a month late, just releasing this much, on their timetable. Some of what they released were taken down within hours. Not exactly full, timely compliance, by any means.

No. They didn’t say rape allegations were redacted.

What they have said is that the NAMES of alleged victims have been redacted. Obviously not all of them.

And if your job is to comply with the law that means doing the redactions as best you can. If you make a mistake, yes: the error does need to be corrected.

Compliance is now measured in multiple millions of pages. So your claim is obviously hyperbole.

 

[MarathonMike]

You can bet your bippy on that.

You are dating yourself with that one Doc. But then so am I because I remember it.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Apparently after China unloaded 30 cargo planes

It was impressive the chinese are getting their logistical s*** together...
If They can keep the country and government in one piece

 

[White 6]

No. They didn’t say rape allegations were redacted.

What they have said is that the NAMES of alleged victims have been redacted. Obviously not all of them.

And if your job is to comply with the law that means doing the redactions as best you can. If you make a mistake, yes: the error does need to be corrected.

Compliance is now measured in multiple millions of pages. So your claim is obviously hyperbole.

Accuracy counts. You are correct.
Did DOJ say rape allegations were redacted?
The DOJ has released documents that include unverified sexual assault claims against President Trump, but it has not specifically stated that the rape allegations were redacted. Instead, they have emphasized that some claims are unfounded and false, and that many documents were heavily redacted without clear explanations.

Radio New Zealand PBS

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Apparently after China unloaded 30 cargo planes worth of equipment in Iran, Trump called off the Iran Strike.

Then the metals markets crash $10 Trillion

Then Pam Bondi suddenly decides to honor the Epstein Transparency Act

Any chance the events are connected?

It's funny how all you complain about how dysfunctional and ineffective government is while at the same time accusing them of pulling off all of these elaborate conspiracies.

Which is it?

 

[gipper]

They are complying.

And … it takes such time as it takes. Not exactly a valid complaint.

Also, there’s this: raise your hand if you imagine that anybody “implicated” in the sordid behaviors attributed to Epstein and some of his “guests” is going to get prosecuted all this time later?

With a valid complainant and maybe with an assload of additional evidence. I don’t even care whether it’s an “old” crime. I’m all for prosecuting such miscreants, regardless of political party affiliation.

But for Christ’s sake, none of us know whether there even is a viable victim who’d want to come forward. And we sure as **** don’t know who the individuals are who accepted sexual acts from (or with) a minor.

We know which road you’ll take.