California refuses to turn over voter rolls in the investigation into voter fraud

[danielpalos]

Who is Boss and Ding? What do they have to do with you trolling. The left only has dishonesty.

What trolling? I have presented a valid argument; You, have nothing but emotion, right winger. Stop projecting and blaming others.

In your mind. LOL

He doesn't have valid arguments he has cliches and thinks those are an argument. He just trolls.

Just projecting, again, right winger. How, customary and habitual, and moral of you.

Old boring talking points

Just the right wing, having nothing but repeal, like usual.

 

[jc456]

the right wing dictionary?

Right wingers use the same dictionary that everyone else uses.

Liberals never have seen a dictionary they invent fake shit

Special pleading is all the right wing has; they are just, so special.

You should stick to your made up talking points

I have more than, just repeal; that is why y'all have a problem with it.

You got government on the brain

 

[jc456]

What trolling? I have presented a valid argument; You, have nothing but emotion, right winger. Stop projecting and blaming others.

In your mind. LOL

He doesn't have valid arguments he has cliches and thinks those are an argument. He just trolls.

Just projecting, again, right winger. How, customary and habitual, and moral of you.

Old boring talking points

Just the right wing, having nothing but repeal, like usual.

Or let it die works for me. Get government out of insurance

 

[oreo]

You think with the small brained head.

I am actually a constitutional conservative unlike empty headed brainwashed cultists who worship at the alter of Trump.

Liberal Dictionary:
====================================================
Constitutional Conservative - a leftwinger who hates the Constitution and everything it stands for

the right wing dictionary?

'v
Right wingers use the same dictionary that everyone else uses.

Liberals never have seen a dictionary they invent fake shit

Well we have a ton of RED states that are refusing to turn over voter registration data to Trump's voter fraud commission, so they must be using the same dictionary that liberals are using.

20 states refuse to turn over voter data to Trump voter fraud commission - The Hill | Page 5 | NEWS
States and Trump voter fraud commission set for showdown
Backlash at Trump commission request for 'confidential' voter data

 

[oreo]

More states give Trump the finger

"Top officials in more than 10 states have announced they won't turn over all voter roll data to President Trump's commission on voter fraud. As of Friday afternoon, officials in New York, California, Massachusetts, Kentucky and Virginia had said they would not turn over any of their voter data to the voter fraud commission. Other officials in Connecticut, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Vermont, Utah, North Carolina, Indiana and Iowa said they would only turn over public information on voter rolls, but wouldn't share private information.

And this one is laughable
Wisconsin announced it would turn over public information but would charge the commission $12,500 to buy the voter roll data.
More state officials refuse to turn over voter roll data

It's very clear that the POTUS nor the Federal Voter commission had the authority to order state by state voter rolls--LOL

They will

Here's a statement from Mississipi--LOL

"Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann, a Republican, Hosemann said if he receives a request from the Trump commission, "My reply would be: They can go jump in the Gulf of Mexico, and Mississippi is a great state to launch from." Hosemann also said: "Mississippi residents should celebrate Independence Dour state's right to protect the privacy of our citizens by conducting our own electoral processes."
More than 20 states reject “voter fraud” commission's request for data

More than 20 other states both RED & BLUE have given Trump the middle finger on his voter fraud commission. The rest will follow suit. Each and every state has their own election laws and requirements, and it is incumbent upon them to protect the privacy of their citizens, for obvious reasons. They're not going to cough up birthdays, address's, social security numbers of their citizens, and many are refusing to release any information, and the others will only release public information, that Trump's voter commission can obtain anyway.

So another one of Trump's hail Mary pass's that ended up 20 yards behind the scrimish line--LOL

 

[Papageorgio]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

 

[oreo]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situatioou

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

 

[oreo]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situatioou

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

 

[oreo]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

 

[Papageorgio]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

I get it, it's a state's rights issue, pretty simple. The states have the prerogative to turn it over but again if this was reversed, you lefty nutters would go crazy.

Just the way it is, partisan hypocrisy. Thanks for proving it.

 

[oreo]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

I get it, it's a state's rights issue, pretty simple. The states have the prerogative to turn it over but again if this was reversed, you lefty nutters would go crazy.

Just the way it is, partisan hypocrisy. Thanks for proving it.

I think you know that I am not a lefty. Every state has a Secretary of State that is charge of the election process--and it is incumbent upon them to investigate voter fraud. Could you possibly imagine the liability to the STATES to release personal private secure information of the citizens of that state to Trump's fraud committee and Russians hacked into it--and obtained those lists--with dates of birth, address's, social security numbers, etc.?

 

[Papageorgio]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

I get it, it's a state's rights issue, pretty simple. The states have the prerogative to turn it over but again if this was reversed, you lefty nutters would go crazy.

Just the way it is, partisan hypocrisy. Thanks for proving it.

I think you know that I am not a lefty. Every state has a Secretary of State that is charge of the election process--and it is incumbent upon them to investigate voter fraud. Could you possibly imagine the liability to the STATES to release personal private secure information of the citizens of that state to Trump's fraud committee and Russians hacked into it--and obtained those lists--with dates of birth, address's, social security numbers, etc.?

That has nothing to do with my point. The states have every right to not turnover the voter rolls, it is a state's rights issue. If they situation were reversed the opinions would reverse.

 

[oreo]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

I get it, it's a state's rights issue, pretty simple. The states have the prerogative to turn it over but again if this was reversed, you lefty nutters would go crazy.

Just the way it is, partisan hypocrisy. Thanks for proving it.

I think you know that I am not a lefty. Every state has a Secretary of State that is charge of the election process--and it is incumbent upon them to investigate voter fraud. Could you possibly imagine the liability to the STATES to release personal private secure information of the citizens of that state to Trump's fraud committee and Russians hacked into it--and obtained those lists--with dates of birth, address's, social security numbers, etc.?

That has nothing to do with my point. The states have every right to not turnover the voter rolls, it is a state's rights issue. If they situation were reversed the opinions would reverse.

Now mine would not be reversed--as we see there are many RED states (ones that are run by Republicans) that are refusing to give this information to Trump's voter fraud commission. There's over 20 right now, and this number is going to grow to all 50 states.

When you have the Secretary of State of Mississippi telling Trump to f off they're not going to do it, it's not just a left wing ONLY issue.
Backlash at Trump commission request for 'confidential' voter data

 

[Faun]

This is one of the few times that I agree with California. I do not want my personal information being bandied about by a political huckster. What will they do with these names? Anyone who has a foreign sounding name will be suspect? This committee is a fraud.

Nazi Germany collected data on private citizens to determine who was Jewish.

 

[busybee01]

So why don't you want to know and stop it?

He is back to his trolling.

What kind of argument is that? We need to go the thread where the right wing blames the left for having nothing but emotional fallacies instead of reason.

You have no reason, only an unsubstantiated opinion. Methinks, You don't want to Compete. Want to get Boss and Ding involved.

Who is Boss and Ding? What do they have to do with you trolling. The left only has dishonesty.

So has Trump sycophants like you.

I didn't vote for Trump, and not thrilled with him so far. Better than expect.

So you say.

 

[busybee01]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

Republicans supposedly believe in states' rights. Republicans went crazy when the Obama Administration suggested state election systems should be declared critical infrastructure.

 

[2aguy]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

I get it, it's a state's rights issue, pretty simple. The states have the prerogative to turn it over but again if this was reversed, you lefty nutters would go crazy.

Just the way it is, partisan hypocrisy. Thanks for proving it.

I think you know that I am not a lefty. Every state has a Secretary of State that is charge of the election process--and it is incumbent upon them to investigate voter fraud. Could you possibly imagine the liability to the STATES to release personal private secure information of the citizens of that state to Trump's fraud committee and Russians hacked into it--and obtained those lists--with dates of birth, address's, social security numbers, etc.?

Dipshit....it is public information that they sell to political parties....moron.

 

[2aguy]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

Republicans supposedly believe in states' rights. Republicans went crazy when the Obama Administration suggested state election systems should be declared critical infrastructure.

Yeah, because he wanted direct access to the actual voting machines...moron. Trump's commission wants public records...that the state governments sell to political parties....

 

[2aguy]

This is one of the few times that I agree with California. I do not want my personal information being bandied about by a political huckster. What will they do with these names? Anyone who has a foreign sounding name will be suspect? This committee is a fraud.

Nazi Germany collected data on private citizens to determine who was Jewish.

yes...socialists do that...they also murdered 12 million Europeans, unarmed Europeans.

The information Trump wants is sold by the states to whatever political party wants them...but nice of you to be a shit stain and make a comparison to socialists...nice lie....

 

[2aguy]

What I find amusing is the left is all against state's rights, except now when they are defying a Republican. Now if the situation was reversed, the left would be crying rivers of tears over this.

You don't seem to GET that each and every state is in charge of their own electoral/election process. They have their own regulations and requirements and the Secretary of each State is in charge of that. If there is no evidence of election fraud then there will be NO investigation.

It is very clear by these Red & Blue states telling Trump to **** off--that they don't believe that there was massive voter fraud in this country, and they are not going to release very private information on their citizens, (social security numbers, birthdays, address's) that were requested of them, to do with that information as the ass clown wishes.

Could you possibly imagine state liability -- if that information got into the wrong hands?

I get it, it's a state's rights issue, pretty simple. The states have the prerogative to turn it over but again if this was reversed, you lefty nutters would go crazy.

Just the way it is, partisan hypocrisy. Thanks for proving it.

I think you know that I am not a lefty. Every state has a Secretary of State that is charge of the election process--and it is incumbent upon them to investigate voter fraud. Could you possibly imagine the liability to the STATES to release personal private secure information of the citizens of that state to Trump's fraud committee and Russians hacked into it--and obtained those lists--with dates of birth, address's, social security numbers, etc.?

That has nothing to do with my point. The states have every right to not turnover the voter rolls, it is a state's rights issue. If they situation were reversed the opinions would reverse.

They aren't private information, in fact, the states sell that information to the political parties..this is nothing more than posturing by left wing nut jobs...