OMG. I heard that the Right was creating videos with strategic snippets - never full sessions - but I assumed educated people didn't take them seriously.
Can you supply the dates and full transcripts of every comment, so we can see everything that was said. Please tell me you don't get your information from a political organization that pre-selects razor thin quotes - no dates, no context - and then provides 3rd grade sub-titles in order to ensure the viewer generates the correct opinion. (Wow, just wow) Please give us the full video of each session so we can hear everything that was said.
(Wow. Do people on the right get their information pre-packaged like this? Without dates or full context? Is everything washed and edited before they get it? Please tell me this isn't true)
FYI: There is no context that would let us know exactly what each speaker is referring to. We never get to hear the full exchange, or the questions asked. And it's clear that some dialogue was cut short because it didn't support the opinion of the partisan hack who created this video.
(Help)
The Bush video I used is from May 17 2002. You can get the full transcript if you like.
This was written in 2005, I'm sure it's out of context too.


On a sunny Monday in June 2002, President George W. Bush stood in the St. Paul AME Church in a formerly dilapidated neighborhood on the south side of Atlanta. Sitting in prime seats were Franklin Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae, and Leland Brendsel, the CEO of Freddie Mac. The President was there to unveil an initiative aimed at helping 5.5 million minority families buy homes before the end of the decade--"Part of being a secure America," he said, "is to encourage home-ownership."
Raines and Brendsel were there because, well, encouraging home-ownership was what their congressionally chartered companies existed to do. By purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of mortgages held by banks, Fannie and its cousin Freddie made it possible for financial institutions to turn around and make more loans to prospective homeowners. Or at least that's the theory.
Raines and Brendsel were there because, well, encouraging home-ownership was what their congressionally chartered companies existed to do. By purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of mortgages held by banks, Fannie and its cousin Freddie made it possible for financial institutions to turn around and make more loans to prospective homeowners. Or at least that's the theory.
It hasn't even been three years since that sunny day in Atlanta, but oh, how the world has changed. Both Brendsel and Raines have been deposed in the wake of
multibillion-dollar accounting scandals. Brendsel fell in 2003, after government regulators accused Freddie Mac of understating billions in profits in an effort to smooth earnings. More recently the Securities and Exchange Commission ruled that Fannie Mae--the larger and more important of the two companies--had violated accounting rules, overstating profits by an estimated $9 billion since 2001, which represents almost 40% of its total earnings during that period. Raines, who was paid more than $90 million during his six years as CEO--much of it linked to meeting profit targets--made a last-ditch effort to save his job, but to no avail. CFO Tim Howard was also forced out. Fannie's accounting firm of 36 years, KPMG, was fired. Once one of the most politically powerful companies in America--with staunch allies in Congress who did its bidding, a notoriously weak regulator, and a willingness to steamroller its critics--Fannie today is more vulnerable, in both a business and political sense, than it has ever been before. However it emerges from this scandal, it will almost surely never again be the unstoppable force it once was.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/01/24/8234040/index.htm
BTW Who has warned you that the 'right' was falsely editing videos to exploit their meaning, Ed Shultz!?!?!??!


