Bush "exploited" 9/11, but libs aren't with Ground Zero Mosque?

[Flopper]

The lefties are so damn desparate now that they want Bush to come out and endorse the mosque and agree with Obama. They trashed and lied about the guy for 8 years and now they want him to help them.

You lefties honestly and truly are dispicable miscreants.

Bush making a statement in support of constitution rights would be just a bit out of character.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The people against the mosque are exploiting the memories of the dead.

Not the people building the mosque.

 

[uscitizen]

If there is any hidden truth about 911 it will likely eventually come out.

People (mostly the right) still exploit 911 for political purposes.

 

[Jack Fate]

The muslilms who want the mosque are exploiting 9/11.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The muslilms who want the mosque are exploiting 9/11.

How so? They're not the ones screaming about "hallowed ground" and "graves".

They just want to build their YMIA.

 

[rdean]

The lefties are so damn desparate now that they want Bush to come out and endorse the mosque and agree with Obama. They trashed and lied about the guy for 8 years and now they want him to help them.

You lefties honestly and truly are dispicable miscreants.

This is why your "kind" and people like "teapartysamurai" are referred to as "Minimalist Intellectuals". Because you limited imagination constantly leads to you "knee jerk" conclusions.

A month ago, when I questioned the "wisdom" (I know, it's a new word, go look it up) of putting a Mosque so close to ground zero and the right wingers jumped all over my ass screaming, in capital letters, that this is America and people have the right to worship as they please.

Now it's a month later and it's the righties who are "screaming and ranting", only it's NOT about "rights", but about "Islam". Yes, the SAME Islam they supported when Iraq made Islam the "National Religion" and burned their churches and scattered their Christians and proclaimed in their constitution that "All legislation is to be based on Islam".

Even though Howard Dean and Barrack Obama, among other prominent Democrats have questioned the wisdom of building an "Islamic Cultural Center" so close to ground zero, they, like most Democrats, understand the WISDOM in following our laws. The WISDOM of the Constitution.

Republicans don't care about the law. They lie, they smear, they slander. Read what the OP wrote. Why would people so lacking in "morals" care about a "little thing" called the law?

That's a lie and you know it. When you have quotes of me being for the ground zero mosque let me know.

The fact that NY has drug it's feet for years to rebuild the Greek Orthodox Church destroyed on 9/11, but now, railroads this mosque, says a lot.

What "freedom" is being respresented when so many people are against this?

Republicans were FOR the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Now their leaders are against it, they have been given their marching orders and now, they are also against the First Amendment.

Both Howard Dean and Barrack Obama have questioned the wisdom of building this Mosque in the current location, but are FOR the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

How this translates into "liberals are dying to build a Mosque at ground zero" is beyond me. Truth doesn't seem to matter to the right. You can carve it out of stone. Fill it with cement and drop it on the heads of conservatives and they still won't "get it".

 

[Jack Fate]

The muslilms who want the mosque are exploiting 9/11.

How so? They're not the ones screaming about "hallowed ground" and "graves".

They just want to build their YMIA.

They want to build it on a site that a lot of Americans consider to close to the "graves" and "hallowed ground". The Muslims want it there to exploit what happened on 9/11. If they were not exploiting the site then how come they will not build it at other offered locations?

 

[Jack Fate]

This is why your "kind" and people like "teapartysamurai" are referred to as "Minimalist Intellectuals". Because you limited imagination constantly leads to you "knee jerk" conclusions.

A month ago, when I questioned the "wisdom" (I know, it's a new word, go look it up) of putting a Mosque so close to ground zero and the right wingers jumped all over my ass screaming, in capital letters, that this is America and people have the right to worship as they please.

Now it's a month later and it's the righties who are "screaming and ranting", only it's NOT about "rights", but about "Islam". Yes, the SAME Islam they supported when Iraq made Islam the "National Religion" and burned their churches and scattered their Christians and proclaimed in their constitution that "All legislation is to be based on Islam".

Even though Howard Dean and Barrack Obama, among other prominent Democrats have questioned the wisdom of building an "Islamic Cultural Center" so close to ground zero, they, like most Democrats, understand the WISDOM in following our laws. The WISDOM of the Constitution.

Republicans don't care about the law. They lie, they smear, they slander. Read what the OP wrote. Why would people so lacking in "morals" care about a "little thing" called the law?

That's a lie and you know it. When you have quotes of me being for the ground zero mosque let me know.

The fact that NY has drug it's feet for years to rebuild the Greek Orthodox Church destroyed on 9/11, but now, railroads this mosque, says a lot.

What "freedom" is being respresented when so many people are against this?

Republicans were FOR the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Now their leaders are against it, they have been given their marching orders and now, they are also against the First Amendment.

Both Howard Dean and Barrack Obama have questioned the wisdom of building this Mosque in the current location, but are FOR the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

How this translates into "liberals are dying to build a Mosque at ground zero" is beyond me. Truth doesn't seem to matter to the right. You can carve it out of stone. Fill it with cement and drop it on the heads of conservatives and they still won't "get it".

Tell me which republican has said they don't have the right to build the mosque at that location.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The muslilms who want the mosque are exploiting 9/11.

How so? They're not the ones screaming about "hallowed ground" and "graves".

They just want to build their YMIA.

They want to build it on a site that a lot of Americans consider to close to the "graves" and "hallowed ground". The Muslims want it there to exploit what happened on 9/11. If they were not exploiting the site then how come they will not build it at other offered locations?

They already bought the land. Why should they not be able to use the land they purchased?

 

[Jack Fate]

How so? They're not the ones screaming about "hallowed ground" and "graves".

They just want to build their YMIA.

They want to build it on a site that a lot of Americans consider to close to the "graves" and "hallowed ground". The Muslims want it there to exploit what happened on 9/11. If they were not exploiting the site then how come they will not build it at other offered locations?

They already bought the land. Why should they not be able to use the land they purchased?

When did they buy the land?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

They want to build it on a site that a lot of Americans consider to close to the "graves" and "hallowed ground". The Muslims want it there to exploit what happened on 9/11. If they were not exploiting the site then how come they will not build it at other offered locations?

They already bought the land. Why should they not be able to use the land they purchased?

When did they buy the land?

At least a few years ago.

 

[Jack Fate]

They already bought the land. Why should they not be able to use the land they purchased?

When did they buy the land?

At least a few years ago.

I rest my case. You're a quack, not a doctor. You should be ashamed of yourself for thinking I'm as stupid as you are. That's why you're a moonbat.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

When did they buy the land?

At least a few years ago.

I rest my case. You're a quack, not a doctor. You should be ashamed of yourself for thinking I'm as stupid as you are. That's why you're a moonbat.

What the **** are you talking about? If you can't behave like an adult, you'll have to sit at the kids table.

 

[HUGGY]

Remember when libs had a FIT about Bush supposedly "using" 9/11 to get re-elected in 2004??????

But NOW it's okay for libs to use 9/11 to get a mosque built at ground zero???????

How come 9/11 was "off limits" all during the Bush admin?

Why you couldn't even show the people who jumped or fell out of the building on tv!!!!!!!!

Why the press even would get in a snit when there were commemorations on 9/11! It was "time to move on!"

But NOW!!!!!!!!!!! It's okay to talk about 9/11 and "freedom" if it's to put a mosque at ground zero!!!!!!

FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!! Isn't it interesting how the dialogue changes when it suits liberals?????

When it DOESN'T advantage them, we should drop the subject of 9/11.

When America is against building a mosque at Ground Zero, ALL OF A SUDDEN, they are all for talking about 9/11 and how "freedom" must be defended by putting it there.

Yeah, right!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgjtSilW8yM]YouTube - Holden Commodore - Worst car crash test[/ame]

 

[Jack Fate]

At least a few years ago.

I rest my case. You're a quack, not a doctor. You should be ashamed of yourself for thinking I'm as stupid as you are. That's why you're a moonbat.

What the **** are you talking about? If you can't behave like an adult, you'll have to sit at the kids table.

Read the thread. Dumb ****.

 

[Missourian]

The lefties are so damn desparate now that they want Bush to come out and endorse the mosque and agree with Obama. They trashed and lied about the guy for 8 years and now they want him to help them.

You lefties honestly and truly are dispicable miscreants.

I saw that on NPR last night..."Why isn't George Bush speaking out?"

I would have never believed the left would reach a level desperation in 18 months that they were forced to call on George W. Bush to save them.





I hope George is enjoying this.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I rest my case. You're a quack, not a doctor. You should be ashamed of yourself for thinking I'm as stupid as you are. That's why you're a moonbat.

What the **** are you talking about? If you can't behave like an adult, you'll have to sit at the kids table.

Read the thread. Dumb ****.

Classy dude, you are.

I did read the thread. Unless you've got a point, I'm just going to assume you're being a dick, and ignore you.

Did you have a point?

 

[Jack Fate]

What the **** are you talking about? If you can't behave like an adult, you'll have to sit at the kids table.

Read the thread. Dumb ****.

Classy dude, you are.

I did read the thread. Unless you've got a point, I'm just going to assume you're being a dick, and ignore you.

Did you have a point?

The muslims bought the land after 9/11. Do you understand what that means?

 

[NYcarbineer]

No.

Using 9/11 as an excuse to demonize and scapegoat decent law abiding Muslim Americans would be

EXPLOITING 9/11.

Just don't go and live in Europe then, its Fascism at its best. I especially like Wilders,etc wanting to ban Islamic immigration and ethnic cleanse Muslims from Europe.

Wilders calls for mass deportation of Muslims

Published on : 15 June 2009 - 10:35am | By Michael Blass
More about:

• Freedom Party
• Geert Wilders

Dutch rightwing MP Geert Wilders has said in an interview on Danish public service television that millions of European Muslims should be deported and stripped of their nationality.
Referring to his Freedom Party’s recent success in the European parliamentary election, he said there were an increasing number of “normal” people in the Netherlands who were afraid of what he describes as “Islamisation”.

Reiterating his frequently expressed view that Islam is antidemocratic, the populist politician said he saw it more as an ideology than a religion. He said a “huge number” of Muslims in Europe want a non-democratic society, and although at present they are still in the minority, “as soon as they start becoming stronger, they will I’m sure change their tune and it will be too late to fight back.”


Mr Wilders stressed that he believed that Muslims who abide by the law and conform to what he described as “our values” should be welcome to stay. However, he said he had a “clear message” to people who did not choose to return to their countries of origin on a “voluntary basis”:

“If you commit a crime, if you start thinking about jihad or sharia, then it’s very clear, we will send you away, we will send you packing, we will strip you of the Dutch or Danish nationality. Abide by the rules, you are welcome to stay, and if you don’t we will send you away the same day.”
Pressed by the interviewer to specify the number of people to whom he thought such measures would apply, he confirmed that he was referring to millions of people.

Mr Wilders’ fiercely Eurosceptic Freedom Party gained four seats in the European Parliament in the recent elections, just one fewer than the Christian Democrats, the senior partner in the Netherlands’ present ruling coalition. If the Treaty of Lisbon is ratified and the Netherlands gains an extra seat in the EU parliament, depending on the calculation method applied it may also be allocated to the Freedom Party.
Wilders calls for mass deportation of Muslims | Radio Netherlands Worldwide

You just proved the point I make over and over again:

We are supposed to be an example TO the rest of the world, not an example OF it.

When we start persecuting the innocent for the crimes of the guilty, we have taken one small step in the direction of which Germany took a very giant leap, once upon a time.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Read the thread. Dumb ****.

Classy dude, you are.

I did read the thread. Unless you've got a point, I'm just going to assume you're being a dick, and ignore you.

Did you have a point?

The muslims bought the land after 9/11. Do you understand what that means?

When after 9/11 was the no-new-mosques law passed? When was the Muslims-can't-own-property law passed?

There must have been some amendments to the constitution to accomplish all that. When did they happen?