Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Other than all the preservatives. Oh the hormones in the beef. The scrunched bun is like fake bread. Oh all the fat too.
I eat them every week and am in good health.Other than all the preservatives. Oh the hormones in the beef. The scrunched bun is like fake bread. Oh all the fat too.
Why not just cook at home and eat real food?I eat them every week and am in good health.
I'm too lazy.Why not just cook at home and eat real food?
They didn't pick the best picture, they created the picture they wanted. Those are not actual edible ingredients in that picture.I think it's hard to prove a false advertising case. And even though I personally also think actual burgers don't look as good as the advertised burgers, nevertheless this isn't proof of anything. Maybe they simply picked the best picture to use in their commercials. This can be argued as "false advertisement" or "misleading", but then it falls upon the accuser to prove it. The burger joint doesn't need to prove anything.
Most likely, I think it's just some schmuck hoping to get rich quick.
Talk about 1st world problems...Burger King is being sued for allegedly using 'bait and switch' tactics with Whopper advertising.
![]()
Burger King to defend Whopper ads in federal court after customers sue for fraud
Burger King will have to defend ads for its Whopper sandwiches after a judge denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by customers alleging fraud.www.usatoday.com
The Whopper has been around since 1957, and now, nearly seven decades later, Burger King will have to defend arguably its most popular sandwich in federal court.
U.S. District Judge Roy K. Altman in Florida, on May 5, denied Burger King's motion to dismiss a 2022 lawsuit alleging the fast food chain misled customers by falsely advertising the Whopper and other menu items in commercials and various in-store and online promotional material.
The 19 people suing Burger King argue that the fast food chain “advertises its burgers as large burgers compared to competitors" by showing them "containing oversized meat patties and ingredients that overflow over the bun to make it appear that the burgers are approximately 35% larger in size, and contain more than double the meat, than the actual burger," according to the lawsuit obtained by USA TODAY.
Promise you this:
View attachment 1108678
But really--they sell you this:
View attachment 1108679
They didn't pick the best picture, they created the picture they wanted. Those are not actual edible ingredients in that picture.