Bummer Boomer. Having A Bad Day?

Vastator

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
23,468
Reaction score
11,120
Points
950
I could say I feel bad for you; but I don't. I'm neither a Boomer, nor extremely wealthy. So for all the hysteria about the market, please understand; it's catastrophic for you, not the other roughly 80% of us.

Today’s market dive disproportionately affects Baby Boomers and the wealthy because they hold a significant portion of their wealth in financial assets, particularly stocks. Boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, are either nearing retirement or already retired, with many relying on investment portfolios, such as 401(k)s and direct stock holdings, to fund their golden years. According to financial insights, they own nearly $20 trillion in stocks—almost half the U.S. market—making them highly exposed to market volatility. A prolonged downturn, like the recent 10% drop in the S&P 500 reported by Business Insider, shrinks their nest eggs, potentially forcing delays in retirement or reduced spending to stay afloat. The wealthy, similarly, have a large share of their net worth tied up in equities and other market-dependent assets, amplifying the impact of a slide compared to those with less invested.
In contrast, the bottom 80% of Americans are less directly affected by this market drop because their wealth is not predominantly tied to the stock market. For most, financial security hinges more on wages, home equity (if they own property), and immediate cash flow rather than investment portfolios. Data from the Federal Reserve highlights that the top 10% of Americans control two-thirds of the nation’s wealth, while the bottom 90%—which includes the bottom 80%—hold just one-third, with much of that in non-financial assets like homes or savings accounts. A market dive doesn’t immediately erode their day-to-day finances since they’re less likely to own significant stock holdings. Their economic struggles, like stagnant wages or rising costs, are more chronic and disconnected from short-term market fluctuations.
That said, indirect effects could eventually trickle down to the bottom 80% if a sustained downturn triggers broader economic consequences, such as job losses or reduced consumer spending by the wealthy and Boomers. However, the immediate sting of today’s dive is felt most acutely by those with substantial market exposure. Boomers face a unique squeeze: with limited time to recover losses due to their age, they’re urged to de-risk portfolios, as noted in Business Insider’s analysis.
(https://www.businessinsider.com/boomers-are-in-big-trouble-if-the-stock-market-keeps-sliding-2025-3).

Meanwhile, the wealthy, though more resilient, still see significant paper losses. For the bottom 80%, the market’s ups and downs remain a distant concern compared to pressing issues like inflation or job security, underscoring a stark divide in how economic shocks ripple through society.
(Wealth Inequality and the Racial Wealth Gap).

So keep tje sobbing down. Most of us don't care. And many of us in the know are absolutely loving it...
 
Why yes people who have been in the game for 40 years have more invested than a 22 year old, but people who have been in the game 40 years also has seen this crap before.
While I admire/understand your perspective on the matter... I find it hilarious that the pundits, and talking heads; feel like we should be as panic stricken as they are; when for most of us, it's practically a non issue. These losses couldn't have possibly happened to more deserving bunch.
 
OK Zoomer, you will pay the tariff inflation on prices like everyone else.
 
The speculative gambling houses of Wall Street don't represent the reality of Main Street.

Regardless, you can bet there are a few making a fortune off this market downtown.
 
I could say I feel bad for you; but I don't. I'm neither a Boomer, nor extremely wealthy. So for all the hysteria about the market, please understand; it's catastrophic for you, not the other roughly 80% of us.

Today’s market dive disproportionately affects Baby Boomers and the wealthy because they hold a significant portion of their wealth in financial assets, particularly stocks. Boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, are either nearing retirement or already retired, with many relying on investment portfolios, such as 401(k)s and direct stock holdings, to fund their golden years. According to financial insights, they own nearly $20 trillion in stocks—almost half the U.S. market—making them highly exposed to market volatility. A prolonged downturn, like the recent 10% drop in the S&P 500 reported by Business Insider, shrinks their nest eggs, potentially forcing delays in retirement or reduced spending to stay afloat. The wealthy, similarly, have a large share of their net worth tied up in equities and other market-dependent assets, amplifying the impact of a slide compared to those with less invested.
In contrast, the bottom 80% of Americans are less directly affected by this market drop because their wealth is not predominantly tied to the stock market. For most, financial security hinges more on wages, home equity (if they own property), and immediate cash flow rather than investment portfolios. Data from the Federal Reserve highlights that the top 10% of Americans control two-thirds of the nation’s wealth, while the bottom 90%—which includes the bottom 80%—hold just one-third, with much of that in non-financial assets like homes or savings accounts. A market dive doesn’t immediately erode their day-to-day finances since they’re less likely to own significant stock holdings. Their economic struggles, like stagnant wages or rising costs, are more chronic and disconnected from short-term market fluctuations.
That said, indirect effects could eventually trickle down to the bottom 80% if a sustained downturn triggers broader economic consequences, such as job losses or reduced consumer spending by the wealthy and Boomers. However, the immediate sting of today’s dive is felt most acutely by those with substantial market exposure. Boomers face a unique squeeze: with limited time to recover losses due to their age, they’re urged to de-risk portfolios, as noted in Business Insider’s analysis.
(https://www.businessinsider.com/boomers-are-in-big-trouble-if-the-stock-market-keeps-sliding-2025-3).

Meanwhile, the wealthy, though more resilient, still see significant paper losses. For the bottom 80%, the market’s ups and downs remain a distant concern compared to pressing issues like inflation or job security, underscoring a stark divide in how economic shocks ripple through society.
(Wealth Inequality and the Racial Wealth Gap).

So keep tje sobbing down. Most of us don't care. And many of us in the know are absolutely loving it...
Worried about the Boomers, but not the 1%?! The oligarchs are laughing while we fight amongst ourselves. Elon isn’t looking for waste on our behalf, but to fund EV and SpaceX grants. Ayn Rand would have called him a looter!

SHRUG
 
Today’s market dive disproportionately affects Baby Boomers
Yawn, day to day fluctuations in the market don't affect most long term investors. LMAO, todays drop provides a great opportunity to buy. At one point today, gold was down $22--if you had sold in the morning and bought when it was down that much, you would be $39/oz richer. On 100 ounces, thats a quick $3900 -- meh, you're rich--its just chicken scratch to you.
 
Yawn, day to day fluctuations in the market don't affect most long term investors. LMAO, todays drop provides a great opportunity to buy. At one point today, gold was down $22--if you had sold in the morning and bought when it was down that much, you would be $39/oz richer. On 100 ounces, thats a quick $3900 -- meh, you're rich--its just chicken scratch to you.
This is not a day to day fluctuation in the market.

Meh, you are a very poor MAGA hyper hypo.
 
I could say I feel bad for you; but I don't. I'm neither a Boomer, nor extremely wealthy. So for all the hysteria about the market, please understand; it's catastrophic for you, not the other roughly 80% of us.

It's not catastrophic for anybody.

The surest bet anyone with half a brain could make?

The market will be at all time highs within weeks - and by then the Left will have already moved on to their next manufactured outrage and will already be pretending they never said anything they're saying right now.

Ya know, as per usual.

Meanwhile - ya might wanna be a tad less of a commie.

Just sayin'.
 
Meh ....I'm good
They're looking to tank the market


Trump is trying to crash the stock market at least 20% 30% which can cause a run into treasuries....
Long story short I believe he's looking to refinance debt at 0% why hes so crazy about interest rates .
he's also looking too cause a deflationary spiral which would greatly benefit the middle classes and the poor
 
I could say I feel bad for you; but I don't. I'm neither a Boomer, nor extremely wealthy. So for all the hysteria about the market, please understand; it's catastrophic for you, not the other roughly 80% of us.

Today’s market dive disproportionately affects Baby Boomers and the wealthy because they hold a significant portion of their wealth in financial assets, particularly stocks. Boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, are either nearing retirement or already retired, with many relying on investment portfolios, such as 401(k)s and direct stock holdings, to fund their golden years. According to financial insights, they own nearly $20 trillion in stocks—almost half the U.S. market—making them highly exposed to market volatility. A prolonged downturn, like the recent 10% drop in the S&P 500 reported by Business Insider, shrinks their nest eggs, potentially forcing delays in retirement or reduced spending to stay afloat. The wealthy, similarly, have a large share of their net worth tied up in equities and other market-dependent assets, amplifying the impact of a slide compared to those with less invested.
In contrast, the bottom 80% of Americans are less directly affected by this market drop because their wealth is not predominantly tied to the stock market. For most, financial security hinges more on wages, home equity (if they own property), and immediate cash flow rather than investment portfolios. Data from the Federal Reserve highlights that the top 10% of Americans control two-thirds of the nation’s wealth, while the bottom 90%—which includes the bottom 80%—hold just one-third, with much of that in non-financial assets like homes or savings accounts. A market dive doesn’t immediately erode their day-to-day finances since they’re less likely to own significant stock holdings. Their economic struggles, like stagnant wages or rising costs, are more chronic and disconnected from short-term market fluctuations.
That said, indirect effects could eventually trickle down to the bottom 80% if a sustained downturn triggers broader economic consequences, such as job losses or reduced consumer spending by the wealthy and Boomers. However, the immediate sting of today’s dive is felt most acutely by those with substantial market exposure. Boomers face a unique squeeze: with limited time to recover losses due to their age, they’re urged to de-risk portfolios, as noted in Business Insider’s analysis.
(https://www.businessinsider.com/boomers-are-in-big-trouble-if-the-stock-market-keeps-sliding-2025-3).

Meanwhile, the wealthy, though more resilient, still see significant paper losses. For the bottom 80%, the market’s ups and downs remain a distant concern compared to pressing issues like inflation or job security, underscoring a stark divide in how economic shocks ripple through society.
(Wealth Inequality and the Racial Wealth Gap).

So keep tje sobbing down. Most of us don't care. And many of us in the know are absolutely loving it...
You sound worried. I'm surrounded by boomers. They aren't concerned.
 
Meh ....I'm good
They're looking to tank the market


Trump is trying to crash the stock market at least 20% 30% which can cause a run into treasuries....
Long story short I believe he's looking to refinance debt at 0% why hes so crazy about interest rates .
he's also looking too cause a deflationary spiral which would greatly benefit the middle classes and the poor

I respect where you're coming from but this analysis is borderline retarded dude.

Trump is not hiring Elon Musk, Lutnik, and Bessent in an attempt to tank the market.

That's fucking delusional.

But thanks for your communist take.

And deflationary spirals are not good for ANYONE, just ask Japan.
 
I respect where you're coming from but this analysis is borderline retarded dude.

Trump is not hiring Elon Musk, Lutnik, and Bessent in an attempt to tank the market.

That's fucking delusional.

But thanks for your communist take.

And deflationary spirals are not good for ANYONE, just ask Japan.
Musk was only there to head up the department to start cutting a fat
He wants to be George Soros for the right during elections that's his business


Telling ya they're doing it on purpose
They know the market hate uncertainty big drops have been known to cause runs into treasuries

Japan hasn't changed since the '90s lol
And throw away the textbook where deflation is always bad
 
Musk was only there to head up the department to start cutting a fat

Cutting a fat?

Which fat?

Jerry Nadler?

He wants to be George Soros for the right during elections that's his business

OK, don't see how that's relevant to somehow proving the absolutely asinine covert LEFTIST take that Trump is actually trying to TANK the stock market.

Which he didn't do in his first term, quite the opposite.

But sure, now he - like - totally hates capitalism and wants to make middle class workers with 401Ks suffer for the sake of the proletariat.

Are you on the Dems' payroll?

Yep.
 
Cutting a fat?

Which fat?

Jerry Nadler?



OK, don't see how that's relevant to somehow proving the absolutely asinine covert LEFTIST take that Trump is actually trying to TANK the stock market.

Which he didn't do in his first term, quite the opposite.

But sure, now he - like - totally hates capitalism and wants to make middle class workers with 401Ks suffer for the sake of the proletariat.

Are you on the Dems' payroll?

Yep.

You're not in his first f****** term
Terry nadler
I'm using voice
Going after waste and thievery you know doge
Ever hear of Switzerland

like I said throw out your dictionary

However, for a period of approximately five years, prices of consumer goods went down in Switzerland without any widespread negative impact on the country's economy.1 In fact, their economy prospered in the midst of falling prices.2 This has caused some economists to revise their opinion about the ill effects of deflation, with some arguing that as long as there isn't too much deflation, consumers and producers in an economy


Am I a Democrat like Trump no
 
Back
Top Bottom