The Duke
Diamond Member
- Jul 30, 2022
- 43,066
- 55,991
- 3,488
Long drop is the way to go.The long drop method done right is a quick death with instant unconsciousness.
That or bring back the guillotine.
Pretty humane, really.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Long drop is the way to go.The long drop method done right is a quick death with instant unconsciousness.
That or bring back the guillotine.
The long drop method done right is a quick death with instant unconsciousness.
The operative word is if done right.
They've done it wrong, and had anything from slow strangulation, to decapitation.
Lengths and weights are quantitative measures. Long drop is the best way.The operative word is if done right.
They've done it wrong, and had anything from slow strangulation, to decapitation.
As long as we can be ghoulish.Considering this is done to murderers, you aren't twinging my pity meter.
The purpose is to do it right. If the activists try to remove lethal injection as a method, which they are doing, we go back to hanging.
As long as we can be ghoulish.
Anything goes.
Yeah, those southern lynchings really killed the vibe.Ghoulish isn't needed.
Justice is needed. The hanging doesn't have to be public.
Yeah, those southern lynchings really killed the vibe.
You realize that Ted Bundy went to Florida to murder women became they had the death.
Hilarious
When did a zygote become a person.
The stated problem is that it's irreversible and far too many people who have been convicted were later on exonerated by DNA evidence which either wasn't available or used at the time of their convictions or things were done unlawfully to prevent exculpatory evidence from being presented at trial.The death penalty is actually far more humane.
Don't know what the problem is with execution.
People can go out with a smile on their face if you shoot them up with enough heroine.
The stated problem is that it's irreversible and far too many people who have been convicted were later on exonerated by DNA evidence which either wasn't available or used at the time of their convictions or things were done unlawfully to prevent exculpatory evidence from being presented at trial.
In cases where it's clear that the defendant committed the crime - confession along with video or forensics evidence, etc. and the crime is particularly heinous, like the individual who set a homeless woman on fire while she slept on a New York subway, in my opinion the death penalty is appropriate and should be reserved for only clear cut guilt.
Although the needle is too good for this particular piece of crap in my opinion.