Bruce Ohr transcript released

[Thinker101]

Adam Schiff, don't go on any vacations. Soon we should be seeing FISA warrants, 302's, etc.

Adam Schiff Proven a Liar As the Bruce Ohr Transcript Is Released

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Ohr Interview Transcript 8.28.18.pdf

 

[S.J.]

The string has been pulled. Let the unravelling begin.

 

[caddo kid]

I will take the 'Conspiracy Theory' sub forum for $1,000 Alex ..........

 

[AntonToo]

Unlike you red state swallowing fools I've read the transcript and everything looks above board.

RedState claims: For instance, Schiff claims Steele was never paid. Ohr says he was.

Except ofcourse thats a fabrication and Schiff didn't say that.

Further, Ohr confirms that Schiff was correct that Ohr's role was grossly overstated by Nunez.

Ohr passed on to FBI whatever information was given to him, he did not pass information back, he correctly disclosed that information was coming from one sided source, he disclosed that Steelie belived that Trump was compromised and shouldn't be anywhere near WH.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Any key points to look for, or what?

 

[AntonToo]

Any key points to look for, or what?

How the heck would those tools know?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Adam Schiff, don't go on any vacations. Soon we should be seeing FISA warrants, 302's, etc.

Adam Schiff Proven a Liar As the Bruce Ohr Transcript Is Released

https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Ohr Interview Transcript 8.28.18.pdf

Old news....you got your talking points email too late....


Rep. DougCollins releases UNREDACTED transcript of Bruce Ohr testimony to his website:

 

[Hellokitty]

Unlike you red state swallowing fools I've read the transcript and everything looks above board.

RedState claims: For instance, Schiff claims Steele was never paid. Ohr says he was.

Except ofcourse thats a fabrication and Schiff didn't say that.

Further, Ohr confirms that Schiff was correct that Ohr's role was grossly overstated by Nunez.

Ohr passed on to FBI whatever information was given to him, he did not pass information back, he correctly disclosed that information was coming from one sided source, he disclosed that Steelie belived that Trump was compromised and shouldn't be anywhere near WH.

Nellie Ohr was working for the DOJ while she was also working for Fusion GPS, she was feeding Steele material to incorporate in the dossier. Steele would then feed the completed material to Bruce Ohr. Bruce Ohr was meeting with Steele long after Mueller was appointed.

There is a lot to be learned from Collins making this public. Mainly with it being public it will be harder for Barr to sweep under the rug.

 

[AntonToo]

Unlike you red state swallowing fools I've read the transcript and everything looks above board.

RedState claims: For instance, Schiff claims Steele was never paid. Ohr says he was.

Except ofcourse thats a fabrication and Schiff didn't say that.

Further, Ohr confirms that Schiff was correct that Ohr's role was grossly overstated by Nunez.

Ohr passed on to FBI whatever information was given to him, he did not pass information back, he correctly disclosed that information was coming from one sided source, he disclosed that Steelie belived that Trump was compromised and shouldn't be anywhere near WH.

Nellie Ohr was working for the DOJ while she was also working for Fusion GPS, she was feeding Steele material to incorporate in the dossier. Steele would then feed the completed material to Bruce Ohr. Bruce Ohr was meeting with Steele long after Mueller was appointed.

There is a lot to be learned from Collins making this public. Mainly with it being public it will be harder for Barr to sweep under the rug.

You are confused, Nellie was not employed by DOJ.

Ohr was not part of the investigation or any decision making, as he wasn't a counter-inteligence specialist. He merely passed on what he got.

 

[depotoo]

Ohr took it upon himself not to notify his bosses what he was doing, as well as didn’t fully explain all the connections between his wife, fusion gps, Chris Steele, et al to his handlers.
And yes, I read it all when it came out today.
These were interesting tidbits as well-

A Chris Steele provided information that did help specific cases, yes.

Q And did you sometimes also consult with him on your official matters, or was it more just receiving information?

A I think it was more receiving information.

Q And this information that you received from Mr. Steele proved credible and actionable in some of your cases?

A At least in some of the cases, I think it was actionable, yes.

Q Okay.

......

A I think -- my impression is that Chris Steele believed his sources. What I should say in addition, though, is that whenever you are dealing with information from Russia, you have to be careful, because it is a very complicated place. And so even information from a good source has to be looked at carefully.

Q Okay.

......

Mr. Meadows. So why would you have informed Bruce Swartz and

not Sally Yates?

Mr. Ohr. My -- at the time my lead was this is source

information, lead information. It's nothing that they can do

anything with. It should be passed to the FBI for them to use it

or not as they feel appropriate.

Unlike you red state swallowing fools I've read the transcript and everything looks above board.

RedState claims: For instance, Schiff claims Steele was never paid. Ohr says he was.

Except ofcourse thats a fabrication and Schiff didn't say that.

Further, Ohr confirms that Schiff was correct that Ohr's role was grossly overstated by Nunez.

Ohr passed on to FBI whatever information was given to him, he did not pass information back, he correctly disclosed that information was coming from one sided source, he disclosed that Steelie belived that Trump was compromised and shouldn't be anywhere near WH.

He knew none of it was verified.

 

[Hellokitty]

Unlike you red state swallowing fools I've read the transcript and everything looks above board.

RedState claims: For instance, Schiff claims Steele was never paid. Ohr says he was.

Except ofcourse thats a fabrication and Schiff didn't say that.

Further, Ohr confirms that Schiff was correct that Ohr's role was grossly overstated by Nunez.

Ohr passed on to FBI whatever information was given to him, he did not pass information back, he correctly disclosed that information was coming from one sided source, he disclosed that Steelie belived that Trump was compromised and shouldn't be anywhere near WH.

Nellie Ohr was working for the DOJ while she was also working for Fusion GPS, she was feeding Steele material to incorporate in the dossier. Steele would then feed the completed material to Bruce Ohr. Bruce Ohr was meeting with Steele long after Mueller was appointed.

There is a lot to be learned from Collins making this public. Mainly with it being public it will be harder for Barr to sweep under the rug.

You are confused, Nellie was not employed by DOJ.

Ohr was not part of the investigation or any decision making, as he wasn't a counter-inteligence specialist. He merely passed on what he got.

Representative Doug Collins Releases Bruce Ohr Transcript and Announces More to Follow (Full pdf)…

"As we discovered yesterday, Nellie Ohr was working for the DOJ-NSD (national security division) in 2016, at the same time she was working for Fusion GPS.

Nellie Ohr was obviously a DOJ-NSD contractor providing analysis on issues relating to Russia and Organized Crime. The release from Judicial Watch outlined consistent Nellie Ohr work within government throughout the time-frame within their FOIA request. It’s likely, hell damn certain, the Nellie Ohr government work also extends beyond the time limits within the FOIA.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?

Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?

It seems like we are assuming that just the existence of the warrant proves Trump is guilty.

What is seems to me is that a lot of people either straight up lied, or at least did not 100%verify all the info.

 

[Thinker101]

Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?

Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?

It seems like we are assuming that just the existence of the warrant proves Trump is guilty.

What is seems to me is that a lot of people either straight up lied, or at least did not 100%verify all the info.

Sure seems to be the case, if it went through the FISA process who would ever question it....or so they thought.

 

[Yarddog]

The string has been pulled. Let the unravelling begin.

Uhhmmm something tells me these crimes are going to be found much heavier than some questionable campaign finance violations.

 

[Olde Europe]

Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?

Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?

It seems like we are assuming that just the existence of the warrant proves Trump is guilty.

What is seems to me is that a lot of people either straight up lied, or at least did not 100%verify all the info.

So, the voices in your head instructed you to erect a tiny straw man. They also, wisely, told you to do it in the form of questions, because that way you wouldn't be tied to the lies, as would be the case if you put it in the form of assertions.

Some of the content of the dossier was accurately presented as oppo research to the FISA judges. These are easily experienced enough to pick up on that. In case gullible goofs think that oppo research is "100% true" and proves Trump's guilt, it's the fault of the gullible goofs, not those who wrote the FISA application. That's before we consider that FISA applications are are requests for permission to collect evidence, not guilty verdicts. One would assume, FISA judges are well aware of the difference, even while you are not.

But yeah, you wrestled your tiny straw man to the ground, heroically.

 

[K9Buck]

Uhhmmm something tells me these crimes are going to be found much heavier than some questionable campaign finance violations.

History tells me that NOTHING will be done.

 

[kyzr]

I'm not sure Barr will put his best guys on this unraveling deep state coup. I hope he does. Huber doesn't seem to be doing anything. A second special prosecutor to prosecute the deep state actors seems like a good idea.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?

Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?

It seems like we are assuming that just the existence of the warrant proves Trump is guilty.

What is seems to me is that a lot of people either straight up lied, or at least did not 100%verify all the info.

So, the voices in your head instructed you to erect a tiny straw man. They also, wisely, told you to do it in the form of questions, because that way you wouldn't be tied to the lies, as would be the case if you put it in the form of assertions.

Some of the content of the dossier was accurately presented as oppo research to the FISA judges. These are easily experienced enough to pick up on that. In case gullible goofs think that oppo research is "100% true" and proves Trump's guilt, it's the fault of the gullible goofs, not those who wrote the FISA application. That's before we consider that FISA applications are are requests for permission to collect evidence, not guilty verdicts. One would assume, FISA judges are well aware of the difference, even while you are not.

But yeah, you wrestled your tiny straw man to the ground, heroically.

So the judge fucked up?

Warrants are supposed to be 100% accurate. Oppo research that can’t be verified shouldn’t be used for ******* FISA warrants, you condescending cvnt.

 

[Thinker101]

Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?

Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?

It seems like we are assuming that just the existence of the warrant proves Trump is guilty.

What is seems to me is that a lot of people either straight up lied, or at least did not 100%verify all the info.

So, the voices in your head instructed you to erect a tiny straw man. They also, wisely, told you to do it in the form of questions, because that way you wouldn't be tied to the lies, as would be the case if you put it in the form of assertions.

Some of the content of the dossier was accurately presented as oppo research to the FISA judges. These are easily experienced enough to pick up on that. In case gullible goofs think that oppo research is "100% true" and proves Trump's guilt, it's the fault of the gullible goofs, not those who wrote the FISA application. That's before we consider that FISA applications are are requests for permission to collect evidence, not guilty verdicts. One would assume, FISA judges are well aware of the difference, even while you are not.

But yeah, you wrestled your tiny straw man to the ground, heroically.

Sounds like someone never heard the term "garbage in, garbage out".

 

[ColonelAngus]

Isn’t all the information used to obtain a FISA warrant supposed to be vetted 100% and sworn to be true by those applying for the warrant?

Why won’t anyone put their name on the warrant and straight up say they verified all info on the application was 100% true?

It seems like we are assuming that just the existence of the warrant proves Trump is guilty.

What is seems to me is that a lot of people either straight up lied, or at least did not 100%verify all the info.

So, the voices in your head instructed you to erect a tiny straw man. They also, wisely, told you to do it in the form of questions, because that way you wouldn't be tied to the lies, as would be the case if you put it in the form of assertions.

Some of the content of the dossier was accurately presented as oppo research to the FISA judges. These are easily experienced enough to pick up on that. In case gullible goofs think that oppo research is "100% true" and proves Trump's guilt, it's the fault of the gullible goofs, not those who wrote the FISA application. That's before we consider that FISA applications are are requests for permission to collect evidence, not guilty verdicts. One would assume, FISA judges are well aware of the difference, even while you are not.

But yeah, you wrestled your tiny straw man to the ground, heroically.

Sounds like someone never heard the term "garbage in, garbage out".

All information used to obtain FISA warrants should be 100% accurate and it’s sworn to be by those applying for it.

If the info used is found out to be bullshit, the applicant should be held criminally liable.

Olde Europe is FOS. He said nothing.