British are going to arm more police officers...whaaat?

[idb]

Stupid idiots giving into their fear

What do you wish to bet that the dead soldier in the background would have really liked to have had a gun when this asshole and his buddy hacked him to death with their cleavers there?

I don't think that would have helped him - they hit him with a car first if I recall correctly.

But all those people just standing around sure could have used a gun to shoot this moron out of his socks……instead…one woman walked up and engaged the killer in polite conversation…….remember that video?

Yes...wasn't she brave?

 

[TNHarley]

what a bunch of COWARDS! Don't they know judo chopping would work just as well?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yeah......but.......they banned guns...right? we are told by our very own gun grabbers that Britain is a paradise free from the threat of gun violence...right?

Who said that? Oh right, no one.

 

[MikeK]

If ISIS is successful in carrying out a few major attacks here in the U. S. one of two major changes will take place. Either the ordinary citizen's lawful ability to be armed will be greatly expanded or the atmosphere of daily life will become extremely oppressive with routine stop & frisk searches and commonplace warrantless break-in premises searches by police.

Once this kind of generalized police oppression starts the only thing that will stop it is a violent revolution. So the anti-gun faction should give this some thought and reconsider their opposition to armed citizens, which is the more tolerable of the two possible responses to terrorist activity.

If that happens....most of America will side with the police. I welcome you and the libs to oppose us all though.

I don't understand. Are you saying the public will prefer being randomly stopped and searched and having their homes invaded on the whim of police to being permitted to actively defend themselves against terrorist attacks?

The option of ad-libitum police searches and home invasions will take us back to a time when British Regulars did the searching and was a primary motivation for the American Revolution.

 

[Claudette]

After the terrorist attack there a few years ago I'm surprised they didn't arm their police then.

Its a world full of terrorists out there and the police need to be armed for the next attack in England.

 

[2aguy]

Stupid idiots giving into their fear

What do you wish to bet that the dead soldier in the background would have really liked to have had a gun when this asshole and his buddy hacked him to death with their cleavers there?

I don't think that would have helped him - they hit him with a car first if I recall correctly.

But all those people just standing around sure could have used a gun to shoot this moron out of his socks……instead…one woman walked up and engaged the killer in polite conversation…….remember that video?

Yes...wasn't she brave?

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

 

[idb]

Stupid idiots giving into their fear

What do you wish to bet that the dead soldier in the background would have really liked to have had a gun when this asshole and his buddy hacked him to death with their cleavers there?

I don't think that would have helped him - they hit him with a car first if I recall correctly.

But all those people just standing around sure could have used a gun to shoot this moron out of his socks……instead…one woman walked up and engaged the killer in polite conversation…….remember that video?

Yes...wasn't she brave?

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

That's not brave?

 

[MikeK]

After the terrorist attack there a few years ago I'm surprised they didn't arm their police then.

Its a world full of terrorists out there and the police need to be armed for the next attack in England.

I am surprised, too. I didn't know the French, including a major segment of their police, had allowed themselves to be disarmed. The French, outstandingly, should know better.

But it follows true to form. An armed populace is to government what garlic is to vampires. Governments will go to any length to transform their citizens into subjects and will resist to the last ditch any effort on the part of those subjects to re-arm.

A disarmed public is easy to control.

 

[MikeK]

That's not brave?

No. It's feminine. A woman can get away with something like that. A man could not.

 

[idb]

That's not brave?

No. It's feminine. A woman can get away with something like that. A man could not.

No credit goes to the woman at all then.

 

[MikeK]

No credit goes to the woman at all then.

Credit for what? The damage was already done.

 

[idb]

No credit goes to the woman at all then.

Credit for what? The damage was already done.

Fair enough...she was just doing what chicks do.
So what?

 

[2aguy]

What do you wish to bet that the dead soldier in the background would have really liked to have had a gun when this asshole and his buddy hacked him to death with their cleavers there?

I don't think that would have helped him - they hit him with a car first if I recall correctly.

But all those people just standing around sure could have used a gun to shoot this moron out of his socks……instead…one woman walked up and engaged the killer in polite conversation…….remember that video?

Yes...wasn't she brave?

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

That's not brave?

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

 

[idb]

I don't think that would have helped him - they hit him with a car first if I recall correctly.

But all those people just standing around sure could have used a gun to shoot this moron out of his socks……instead…one woman walked up and engaged the killer in polite conversation…….remember that video?

Yes...wasn't she brave?

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

That's not brave?

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

Of course, you can only be big and strong and brave when you have a gun.

 

[2aguy]

But all those people just standing around sure could have used a gun to shoot this moron out of his socks……instead…one woman walked up and engaged the killer in polite conversation…….remember that video?

Yes...wasn't she brave?

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

That's not brave?

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

Of course, you can only be big and strong and brave when you have a gun.

actually that is the whole point...women, the elderly, those with handicaps, or injuries....can actually stand up to and defeat larger, stronger, more aggressive attackers, even if there are more than one and even if they are also armed....that is the miracle of the gun....that is why guns helped end the strong enslaving the weak.....

Before guns..the physically weak were controlled by the physically strong.....

And even if you are a strong, physically fit male.....add a knife or a gun to the equation or even more than one attacker and the fight becomes so one sided that you are likely to be seriously injured even if you fight off the attackers.....

try studying self defense...so you can post on this subject with a little intelligence....

 

[idb]

Yes...wasn't she brave?

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

That's not brave?

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

Of course, you can only be big and strong and brave when you have a gun.

actually that is the whole point...women, the elderly, those with handicaps, or injuries....can actually stand up to and defeat larger, stronger, more aggressive attackers, even if there are more than one and even if they are also armed....that is the miracle of the gun....that is why guns helped end the strong enslaving the weak.....

Before guns..the physically weak were controlled by the physically strong.....

And even if you are a strong, physically fit male.....add a knife or a gun to the equation or even more than one attacker and the fight becomes so one sided that you are likely to be seriously injured even if you fight off the attackers.....

try studying self defense...so you can post on this subject with a little intelligence....

No, I see your point perfectly.
A gun makes you brave and strong.
Without a gun you can only be stupid and weak.

 

[2aguy]

Brave…no, f*****g stupid is the more accurate term…the guy had just cut the head off of a soldier…and she walks up to him….typical, unarmed European…they don't recognize real threats to their safety even when it is holding a bloody meat cleaver…..

That's not brave?

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

Of course, you can only be big and strong and brave when you have a gun.

actually that is the whole point...women, the elderly, those with handicaps, or injuries....can actually stand up to and defeat larger, stronger, more aggressive attackers, even if there are more than one and even if they are also armed....that is the miracle of the gun....that is why guns helped end the strong enslaving the weak.....

Before guns..the physically weak were controlled by the physically strong.....

And even if you are a strong, physically fit male.....add a knife or a gun to the equation or even more than one attacker and the fight becomes so one sided that you are likely to be seriously injured even if you fight off the attackers.....

try studying self defense...so you can post on this subject with a little intelligence....

No, I see your point perfectly.
A gun makes you brave and strong.
Without a gun you can only be stupid and weak.

No, you are,stupid and weak and that has nothing to do with having or not having a gun.....

 

[idb]

That's not brave?

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

Of course, you can only be big and strong and brave when you have a gun.

actually that is the whole point...women, the elderly, those with handicaps, or injuries....can actually stand up to and defeat larger, stronger, more aggressive attackers, even if there are more than one and even if they are also armed....that is the miracle of the gun....that is why guns helped end the strong enslaving the weak.....

Before guns..the physically weak were controlled by the physically strong.....

And even if you are a strong, physically fit male.....add a knife or a gun to the equation or even more than one attacker and the fight becomes so one sided that you are likely to be seriously injured even if you fight off the attackers.....

try studying self defense...so you can post on this subject with a little intelligence....

No, I see your point perfectly.
A gun makes you brave and strong.
Without a gun you can only be stupid and weak.

No, you are,stupid and weak and that has nothing to do with having or not having a gun.....

But...what if I get a gun?
Then I'll be brave and strong like you!

 

[shadow355]

All Law Enforcement Officers should be armed .

It's pretty dangerous telling someone you are going to arrest them, that they face 6 months in jail , or face 16 years in prison for a felony charge.

It is even dangerous , to just be driving a police cruiser - A Police Officer could get shot at while driving, waiting at a red light , or driving up to a convenience store.

55 seconds the sound comes on -


Shadow 355

 

[2aguy]

When you are clueless you aren't brave....

Of course, you can only be big and strong and brave when you have a gun.

actually that is the whole point...women, the elderly, those with handicaps, or injuries....can actually stand up to and defeat larger, stronger, more aggressive attackers, even if there are more than one and even if they are also armed....that is the miracle of the gun....that is why guns helped end the strong enslaving the weak.....

Before guns..the physically weak were controlled by the physically strong.....

And even if you are a strong, physically fit male.....add a knife or a gun to the equation or even more than one attacker and the fight becomes so one sided that you are likely to be seriously injured even if you fight off the attackers.....

try studying self defense...so you can post on this subject with a little intelligence....

No, I see your point perfectly.
A gun makes you brave and strong.
Without a gun you can only be stupid and weak.

No, you are,stupid and weak and that has nothing to do with having or not having a gun.....

But...what if I get a gun?
Then I'll be brave and strong like you!

Sadly, no. You will never be brave and strong like me or any other brave and strong person…your posts here on U.S. demonstrate that…..and a owning a gun does not make you braver or stronger…it is simply a tool that will allow you to defend yourself in the most effective way possible if a conflict escalates to the point where death or grave bodily harm is possible. But to own a gun you would also need good judgment…..which your posts reveal you do not have…so again, sadly, you are not a good candidate for gun ownership. I suggest you do like other gun grabbers, and if you face violent criminal attack….quickly, and quietly submit to their demands and hope for the best….

Good luck to you….