Breibart Sued

[rightwinger]

It may or may not be for a Jury. I agree that it will be dismissed on Summary, because Breitbart isn't who she should be suing, and she is going to have a hard time building a case against him. USDA and NAACP are the targets she should have gone after, with Breitbart as a "cursory defendant."

I don't think he's worried in the least. In fact, I'd be surprised if he's not giddy as a schoolgirl at the opportunity this presents him. He wants it to go to trial, I'm certain.

If I were him, I certainly would.

I, for one, am glad that he is giddy

Let him prove that his false editing did not set everything else in motion

If not for Breitbart......none of the subsequent actions woul occur

prove he edited anything

Tell it to the judge

 

[MonsterZero]

the Freepers are evil, who knew?

 

[DiveCon]

I, for one, am glad that he is giddy

Let him prove that his false editing did not set everything else in motion

If not for Breitbart......none of the subsequent actions woul occur

prove he edited anything

Tell it to the judge

nope, you made the charge he edited
the burden of proof is on YOU

 

[rightwinger]

prove he edited anything

Tell it to the judge

nope, you made the charge he edited
the burden of proof is on YOU

Fraid not..

He will be forced to give a disposition and declare where he got the video.

 

[WillowTree]

I hope Mrs. Palin takes extensive notes..

 

[DiveCon]

Tell it to the judge

nope, you made the charge he edited
the burden of proof is on YOU

Fraid not..

He will be forced to give a disposition and declare where he got the video.

you made the charge he edited, for you to make that charge you need to have PROOF

 

[rightwinger]

nope, you made the charge he edited
the burden of proof is on YOU

Fraid not..

He will be forced to give a disposition and declare where he got the video.

you made the charge he edited, for you to make that charge you need to have PROOF

Civil suit you need beyond a reasonable doubt. Let the jury look at the evidence and make the call Breitbart will have to show he did not know the clip was doctored when he posted it.

 

[DiveCon]

Fraid not..

He will be forced to give a disposition and declare where he got the video.

you made the charge he edited, for you to make that charge you need to have PROOF

Civil suit you need beyond a reasonable doubt. Let the jury look at the evidence and make the call Breitbart will have to show he did not know the clip was doctored when he posted it.

again, you would need to prove he edited it
all he has to do is present what he had

 

[Two Thumbs]

It's a long shot for her to win much.

She got fired before the video went any where.

 

[The Infidel]

If the bitch sues Andrew, it just deflects attention from the real story if ya ask me.

American Thinker Blog: Forty Acres & a Mule -- Sherrod Style?

 

[rightwinger]

you made the charge he edited, for you to make that charge you need to have PROOF

Civil suit you need beyond a reasonable doubt. Let the jury look at the evidence and make the call Breitbart will have to show he did not know the clip was doctored when he posted it.

again, you would need to prove he edited it
all he has to do is present what he had

First he will have to prove that he didn't edit it
Second he would have to prove that he had no idea that it had been edited

If he knew, or should have known, he would be liable for damages

I watch Judge Judy every day and know this stuff!

 

[Mini 14]

First he will have to prove that he didn't edit it
Second he would have to prove that he had no idea that it had been edited

If he knew, or should have known, he would be liable for damages

I watch Judge Judy every day and know this stuff!

The original video is posted at his site along with the excerpts, so that point has already been proven.

 

[Stephanie]

This is going to open up a big can of worms.

I'm not sure she is going to like it. She is implicated BIG TIME in the Pigford fraud and other stuff.

Go get her Breitbart.

 

[jillian]

It's a long shot for her to win much.

She got fired before the video went any where.

which proves the video was the only cause

 

[rightwinger]

This is going to open up a big can of worms.

I'm not sure she is going to like it. She is implicated BIG TIME in the Pigford fraud and other stuff.

Go get her Breitbart.

What does she, as an employee have to do with Pigford?

 

[rightwinger]

First he will have to prove that he didn't edit it
Second he would have to prove that he had no idea that it had been edited

If he knew, or should have known, he would be liable for damages

I watch Judge Judy every day and know this stuff!

The original video is posted at his site along with the excerpts, so that point has already been proven.

Maybe proven to Breitbart....not to a jury

Breitbarts claims of innocence will wring hollow

 

[jillian]

First he will have to prove that he didn't edit it
Second he would have to prove that he had no idea that it had been edited

If he knew, or should have known, he would be liable for damages

I watch Judge Judy every day and know this stuff!

The original video is posted at his site along with the excerpts, so that point has already been proven.

Maybe proven to Breitbart....not to a jury

Breitbarts claims of innocence will wring hollow

plus he has a history of chopping up video to misrepresent things.

 

[Stephanie]

The original video is posted at his site along with the excerpts, so that point has already been proven.

Maybe proven to Breitbart....not to a jury

Breitbarts claims of innocence will wring hollow

plus he has a history of chopping up video to misrepresent things.

Give us a break Jilly, PMSnbc is famous for editing videos. you all act like no one else does it.
you have no PROOF the video was edited, but I guess we will now find out, eh.
Then this could come back to bite the Saint Sherrod in the ass.
I hope it does, couldn't happen to a slimier person.

 

[jillian]

Maybe proven to Breitbart....not to a jury

Breitbarts claims of innocence will wring hollow

plus he has a history of chopping up video to misrepresent things.

Give us a break Jilly, PMSnbc is famous for editing videos. you all act like no one else does it.
you have no PROOF the video was edited, but I guess we will now find out, eh.
Then this could come back to bite the Saint Sherrod in the ass.
I hope it does, couldn't happen to a slimier person.

you have such a way with words, steffie... ugly, course, nasty, ignrant ...

but it's certainly a way, i suppose.

now if only you had a brain.

 

[Stephanie]

plus he has a history of chopping up video to misrepresent things.

Give us a break Jilly, PMSnbc is famous for editing videos. you all act like no one else does it.
you have no PROOF the video was edited, but I guess we will now find out, eh.
Then this could come back to bite the Saint Sherrod in the ass.
I hope it does, couldn't happen to a slimier person.

you have such a way with words, steffie... ugly, course, nasty, ignrant ...

but it's certainly a way, i suppose.

now if only you had a brain.

ugly, course, nasty, ignrant describes you my dear. So being a lawyer fits you I guess.