BREAKING: Voter Fraud In Michigan Favored Clinton – NOT Trump Clinton cheated

[Flash]

[

Fake news.

Fake news?

You mean like when that shithead Obama and that asshole Clinton told the American people and the families of the victims that the 9/11 attack on the Benghazi embassy compound was caused by a reaction to an obscure internet video?

Is that the kind of fake news you are referring to Moon Bat? Or was it simple Democrat lying?

 

[Pogo]

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit

That a Federal judge was ordered by Obama to halt the recount, as no one in the Obama administration wants Trump to have another 5 million votes and also have won the popular vote. Now this was always the situation, and Obama and Clinton and Trump as well all knew that this was happening before the election, however Trump was expected to lose. Note that if Trump had lost, no recounts would be allowed.

LOL Trump still won

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

 

[Flash]

[Q


Link?

You are not one of the stupid delusional Moon Bats that thinks that Stein, who couldn't even raise a million dollars for her own campaign, could on her own come up with $6 million to do a recount in states that she had no chance of winning but was close for Hillary, are you? Nobody is that ******* stupid, are they? Well maybe you Moon Bats are. You believed Crooked Hillary and Obama lies. You are not exactly the brightest bulbs in the chandelier, are you?

 

[Pogo]

The Clintons are the most repugnant of people… Fact

The pathetic thing is that the vile ***** Crooked Hillary didn't even had the courage to challenge to results herself so she got her sugar daddy Soros to pay Jill Stein to do it for her.

Typical Clinton dishonesty.

Just think of all these sad delusional Moon Bats that were hoping that the recount would magically overturn the election and they could finally leave their safe place.

Hil-Liar couldn't challenge the results herself because of what she said when Trump stated he may not accept the results.

Hillary can not challenge the results because Trump will be involved, and a full recount will be demanded by him, which will uncover millions of illegal votes and fraud by Hillary. This way a judge can and has already stopped the recount when they found double counting for Hillary.

I suspect if they did an audit of California they would find at least a million illegal votes, probably more. Maybe much more. I also suspect a real audit would show significant voter fraud in any of the Democrat machine controlled big cities.

You are correct. Crooked Hillary could not demand a recount without putting herself in jeopardy, so she paid Stein to do it for her in the states that could possible lead to her winning.

It was a blatant attempt at dishonest politics. Something we have learned to expect from Clinton, Obama and the filthy ass Democrat Party. The scum of America.

Actually the 'dishonesty' was the strawman you just set up. You "suspect" if they did an audit they'd find illegal votes, ebola bacteria, secret plans to spike the water supply with antifreeze and twelve million aliens from Planet Ztqona in the voting booth cleverly disguised as Amish. That's all very imaginative but it in no way makes it a real thing, therefore you have no basis from which to project "dishonesty" except upon your own fable.

 

[Pogo]

[Q


Link?

You are not one of the stupid delusional Moon Bats that thinks that Stein, who couldn't even raise a million dollars for her own campaign, could on her own come up with $6 million to do a recount in states that she had no chance of winning but was close for Hillary, are you? Nobody is that ******* stupid, are they? Well maybe you Moon Bats are. You believed Crooked Hillary and Obama lies. You are not exactly the brightest bulbs in the chandelier, are you?

Excellent. Right back to Argument from Ignorance, still expecting different results.

Hope springs eternal I guess.

 

[Bassman007]

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit

That a Federal judge was ordered by Obama to halt the recount, as no one in the Obama administration wants Trump to have another 5 million votes and also have won the popular vote. Now this was always the situation, and Obama and Clinton and Trump as well all knew that this was happening before the election, however Trump was expected to lose. Note that if Trump had lost, no recounts would be allowed.

LOL Trump still won

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

 

[Pogo]

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit

That a Federal judge was ordered by Obama to halt the recount, as no one in the Obama administration wants Trump to have another 5 million votes and also have won the popular vote. Now this was always the situation, and Obama and Clinton and Trump as well all knew that this was happening before the election, however Trump was expected to lose. Note that if Trump had lost, no recounts would be allowed.

LOL Trump still won

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

Again --------------------------- link?

Do summa y'all honestly NOT GET the difference between "reality" and "shit I just made up"?

The ******* point stands, as it always did --- machine scanners jamming cannot be described on any planet as "voter fraud". Holy shit break a brain sweat at some point willya.

 

[Flash]

[Q


Link?

You are not one of the stupid delusional Moon Bats that thinks that Stein, who couldn't even raise a million dollars for her own campaign, could on her own come up with $6 million to do a recount in states that she had no chance of winning but was close for Hillary, are you? Nobody is that ******* stupid, are they? Well maybe you Moon Bats are. You believed Crooked Hillary and Obama lies. You are not exactly the brightest bulbs in the chandelier, are you?

Excellent. Right back to Argument from Ignorance, still expecting different results.

Hope springs eternal I guess.

So you are one of those stupid Moon Bats that thinks that Jill Stein, who could only raised $700K in her campaign, was able to get $6 million for a recount she had no chance of winning (but would help Crooked Hillary) without help from Clinton's filthy rich commie sugar daddy? That figures. You Moon Bats are not exactly known for your smarts, are you? Then you wonder why we ridicule you Moon Bats for your stupidity so much.

 

[Bassman007]

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit

That a Federal judge was ordered by Obama to halt the recount, as no one in the Obama administration wants Trump to have another 5 million votes and also have won the popular vote. Now this was always the situation, and Obama and Clinton and Trump as well all knew that this was happening before the election, however Trump was expected to lose. Note that if Trump had lost, no recounts would be allowed.

LOL Trump still won

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

Again --------------------------- link?

Do summa y'all honestly NOT GET the difference between "reality" and "shit I just made up"?

The ******* point stands, as it always did --- machine scanners jamming cannot be described on any planet as "voter fraud". Holy shit break a brain sweat at some point willya.

Obama is screaming that the Russians did it, and Hillary is screaming thru her new Lesbo lover Jill Stein that Trump cheated. The fact that you are not living in reality and need links is quite amusing, as is the fact that you believe that I can not prove EVERYTHING THAT I SAY.

LOL

Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking - CNNPolitics.com

Michigan Supreme Court Slams The Door On Jill Stein's Recount Case | The Huffington Post

Now scoot off little dog, or I will let the big dogs loose

 

[Pogo]

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit

That a Federal judge was ordered by Obama to halt the recount, as no one in the Obama administration wants Trump to have another 5 million votes and also have won the popular vote. Now this was always the situation, and Obama and Clinton and Trump as well all knew that this was happening before the election, however Trump was expected to lose. Note that if Trump had lost, no recounts would be allowed.

LOL Trump still won

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

Again --------------------------- link?

Do summa y'all honestly NOT GET the difference between "reality" and "shit I just made up"?

The ******* point stands, as it always did --- machine scanners jamming cannot be described on any planet as "voter fraud". Holy shit break a brain sweat at some point willya.

Obama is screaming that the Russians did it, and Hillary is screaming thru her new Lesbo lover Jill Stein that Trump cheated. The fact that you are not living in reality and need links is quite amusing, as is the fact that you believe that I can not prove EVERYTHING THAT I SAY.

LOL

Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking - CNNPolitics.com

Michigan Supreme Court Slams The Door On Jill Stein's Recount Case | The Huffington Post

Now scoot off little dog, or I will let the big dogs loose

No Stoopid ----- I wanted a link to what you actually posted.

So you don't have one. Quelle surprise.

 

[Pogo]

[Q


Link?

You are not one of the stupid delusional Moon Bats that thinks that Stein, who couldn't even raise a million dollars for her own campaign, could on her own come up with $6 million to do a recount in states that she had no chance of winning but was close for Hillary, are you? Nobody is that ******* stupid, are they? Well maybe you Moon Bats are. You believed Crooked Hillary and Obama lies. You are not exactly the brightest bulbs in the chandelier, are you?

Excellent. Right back to Argument from Ignorance, still expecting different results.

Hope springs eternal I guess.

So you are one of those stupid Moon Bats that thinks that Jill Stein, who could only raised $700K in her campaign, was able to get $6 million for a recount she had no chance of winning (but would help Crooked Hillary) without help from Clinton's filthy rich commie sugar daddy? That figures. You Moon Bats are not exactly known for your smarts, are you? Then you wonder why we ridicule you Moon Bats for your stupidity so much.

Excellent. Called out on Argument from Ignorance, he deftly adjusts to the gaffe by reposting the same gaffe all over again, expecting different results.

Can't make this up.

 

[Bassman007]

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit

That a Federal judge was ordered by Obama to halt the recount, as no one in the Obama administration wants Trump to have another 5 million votes and also have won the popular vote. Now this was always the situation, and Obama and Clinton and Trump as well all knew that this was happening before the election, however Trump was expected to lose. Note that if Trump had lost, no recounts would be allowed.

LOL Trump still won

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

Again --------------------------- link?

Do summa y'all honestly NOT GET the difference between "reality" and "shit I just made up"?

The ******* point stands, as it always did --- machine scanners jamming cannot be described on any planet as "voter fraud". Holy shit break a brain sweat at some point willya.

Obama is screaming that the Russians did it, and Hillary is screaming thru her new Lesbo lover Jill Stein that Trump cheated. The fact that you are not living in reality and need links is quite amusing, as is the fact that you believe that I can not prove EVERYTHING THAT I SAY.

LOL

Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking - CNNPolitics.com

Michigan Supreme Court Slams The Door On Jill Stein's Recount Case | The Huffington Post

Now scoot off little dog, or I will let the big dogs loose

No Stoopid ----- I wanted a link to what you actually posted.

So you don't have one. Quelle surprise.

And Hillary Clinton wants to be President.......................Kid you have no rights to demand anything here, so get over it and help Hillary dump her colostomy bag, and no sniffing

You wanna tell us again that Trump will never be the President?

LOL

Link that asswipe

 

[Pop23]

All I know is that people have been concerned about voter fraud and talking about doing something about it for YEARS now, and the liberals would just laugh about it. Now, all of the sudden, they are so CONCERNED about voter fraud. Transparent ninnies is what they are.

I've brought this up several times now.

In California it appears Clintons final vote total will exceed Obamas in both
08 and 12.

In national voting it appears the same will hold true. (Mostly because of California)

Can anyone with half a mind actually believe that Clinton had more people enthusiastic about her then Obama????

If an audit of any state is needed, it is California.

DUH -- there are more votes this year, hello. Because there are more votes every year.

Suuuurrrrrreeeeee there are

Is that why Obamas vote total in 2012 was LESS than 2008?

Lame arguments are, well, lame

Are you just incapable of holding more than one number in that tiny little smoke-filled head at a time, is that it?

Just over 129 million voted in 2008. Over 131 million voted in 2012.
Guess which one of those numbers is higher. Dumbass.

O'bama got more votes in 2008 because turnout was higher. Yet there were over two million MORE votes cast in 2012.

You could have looked this up yourself in like 13 seconds.

Nice deflection.

Does anyone believe that Clinton was more popular than Obama, therefor getting more votes then he in 2008 OR 2012.

Good lord, use your little head for a moment

 

[jon_berzerk]

All I know is that people have been concerned about voter fraud and talking about doing something about it for YEARS now, and the liberals would just laugh about it. Now, all of the sudden, they are so CONCERNED about voter fraud. Transparent ninnies is what they are.

I've brought this up several times now.

In California it appears Clintons final vote total will exceed Obamas in both
08 and 12.

In national voting it appears the same will hold true. (Mostly because of California)

Can anyone with half a mind actually believe that Clinton had more people enthusiastic about her then Obama????

If an audit of any state is needed, it is California.

DUH -- there are more votes this year, hello. Because there are more votes every year.

Suuuurrrrrreeeeee there are

Is that why Obamas vote total in 2012 was LESS than 2008?

Lame arguments are, well, lame

Are you just incapable of holding more than one number in that tiny little smoke-filled head at a time, is that it?

Just over 129 million voted in 2008. Over 131 million voted in 2012.
Guess which one of those numbers is higher. Dumbass.

O'bama got more votes in 2008 because turnout was higher. Yet there were over two million MORE votes cast in 2012.

You could have looked this up yourself in like 13 seconds.

Nice deflection.

Does anyone believe that Clinton was more popular than Obama, therefor getting more votes then he in 2008 OR 2012.

Good lord, use your little head for a moment

funny what butthurt libtards will say

--LOL

 

[Dschrute3]

The Democratic Party invented and perfected Voter Fraud. Wikileaks showed that it's one of the most corrupt institutions on earth. But of course Democrats still refuse to acknowledge and confront that ugly reality. They've instead chosen to deny and deflect, by way of conducting Russia and Trump witch hunts. It is a shameful party at this point.

 

[Pogo]

All I know is that people have been concerned about voter fraud and talking about doing something about it for YEARS now, and the liberals would just laugh about it. Now, all of the sudden, they are so CONCERNED about voter fraud. Transparent ninnies is what they are.

I've brought this up several times now.

In California it appears Clintons final vote total will exceed Obamas in both
08 and 12.

In national voting it appears the same will hold true. (Mostly because of California)

Can anyone with half a mind actually believe that Clinton had more people enthusiastic about her then Obama????

If an audit of any state is needed, it is California.

DUH -- there are more votes this year, hello. Because there are more votes every year.

Suuuurrrrrreeeeee there are

Is that why Obamas vote total in 2012 was LESS than 2008?

Lame arguments are, well, lame

Are you just incapable of holding more than one number in that tiny little smoke-filled head at a time, is that it?

Just over 129 million voted in 2008. Over 131 million voted in 2012.
Guess which one of those numbers is higher. Dumbass.

O'bama got more votes in 2008 because turnout was higher. Yet there were over two million MORE votes cast in 2012.

You could have looked this up yourself in like 13 seconds.

Nice deflection.

Does anyone believe that Clinton was more popular than Obama, therefor getting more votes then he in 2008 OR 2012.

Good lord, use your little head for a moment

Apparently the concept of a greater number of voters in the country (every election) is way too complex for you.

Elections are not in any way "measures of popularity". They're an "either/or". For simple nonworking brains like yours it's sometimes useful to use a parable:

Suppose you were on a lonely road driving in the middle of the night and desperately hungry. You come upon a diner. They only have two things on the menu --- one is a can of Spaghetti-Os that's been sitting for a while. The other is ocelot shit soup with mealybugs and a warm glass of battery acid. If you order the Spaghetti-Os, that doesn't make it "popular".

Ponder that for a year or two. Maybe something will seep in.

 

[Pogo]

This link is the same bullshit headline we saw in the OP title where it can't distinguish technical glitches from "fraud". The only "fraud" is in the headline.

Sit down Hunior and learn something. Ballot-counting discrepancies due to random mechanical failure is not "fraud". Acutal "Fraud" is when a result is deliberately manipulated ---- say a group of voters is thrown off the rolls.

These voting machine errors, which your fraudulent Whirled Nuts (the Birfer rag) link fails to mention, commonly were off by a count of one, and which way they were off isn't even clear. That's not "fraud", it's 'statistical error'.

All of which goes with the fake news from Macedonia image you included here.

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

Again --------------------------- link?

Do summa y'all honestly NOT GET the difference between "reality" and "shit I just made up"?

The ******* point stands, as it always did --- machine scanners jamming cannot be described on any planet as "voter fraud". Holy shit break a brain sweat at some point willya.

Obama is screaming that the Russians did it, and Hillary is screaming thru her new Lesbo lover Jill Stein that Trump cheated. The fact that you are not living in reality and need links is quite amusing, as is the fact that you believe that I can not prove EVERYTHING THAT I SAY.

LOL

Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking - CNNPolitics.com

Michigan Supreme Court Slams The Door On Jill Stein's Recount Case | The Huffington Post

Now scoot off little dog, or I will let the big dogs loose

No Stoopid ----- I wanted a link to what you actually posted.

So you don't have one. Quelle surprise.

And Hillary Clinton wants to be President.......................Kid you have no rights to demand anything here, so get over it and help Hillary dump her colostomy bag, and no sniffing

You wanna tell us again that Trump will never be the President?

LOL

Link that asswipe

So you continue to run even further away from your own point. Courageous.

 

[Bassman007]

If that is true then why is Hillary and Obama SCREAMING THAT THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD.

Well kid, answer that moron.

You people r really confused

Again --------------------------- link?

Do summa y'all honestly NOT GET the difference between "reality" and "shit I just made up"?

The ******* point stands, as it always did --- machine scanners jamming cannot be described on any planet as "voter fraud". Holy shit break a brain sweat at some point willya.

Obama is screaming that the Russians did it, and Hillary is screaming thru her new Lesbo lover Jill Stein that Trump cheated. The fact that you are not living in reality and need links is quite amusing, as is the fact that you believe that I can not prove EVERYTHING THAT I SAY.

LOL

Obama orders review of Russian election-related hacking - CNNPolitics.com

Michigan Supreme Court Slams The Door On Jill Stein's Recount Case | The Huffington Post

Now scoot off little dog, or I will let the big dogs loose

No Stoopid ----- I wanted a link to what you actually posted.

So you don't have one. Quelle surprise.

And Hillary Clinton wants to be President.......................Kid you have no rights to demand anything here, so get over it and help Hillary dump her colostomy bag, and no sniffing

You wanna tell us again that Trump will never be the President?

LOL

Link that asswipe

So you continue to run even further away from your own point. Courageous.

LOL why are the voting problems only found in Democrappic areas? Michigan Recount Results Day 1: Problems Found in Clinton Strongholds

Give up, take your laxative and shit away

 

[Pop23]

I've brought this up several times now.

In California it appears Clintons final vote total will exceed Obamas in both
08 and 12.

In national voting it appears the same will hold true. (Mostly because of California)

Can anyone with half a mind actually believe that Clinton had more people enthusiastic about her then Obama????

If an audit of any state is needed, it is California.

DUH -- there are more votes this year, hello. Because there are more votes every year.

Suuuurrrrrreeeeee there are

Is that why Obamas vote total in 2012 was LESS than 2008?

Lame arguments are, well, lame

Are you just incapable of holding more than one number in that tiny little smoke-filled head at a time, is that it?

Just over 129 million voted in 2008. Over 131 million voted in 2012.
Guess which one of those numbers is higher. Dumbass.

O'bama got more votes in 2008 because turnout was higher. Yet there were over two million MORE votes cast in 2012.

You could have looked this up yourself in like 13 seconds.

Nice deflection.

Does anyone believe that Clinton was more popular than Obama, therefor getting more votes then he in 2008 OR 2012.

Good lord, use your little head for a moment

Apparently the concept of a greater number of voters in the country (every election) is way too complex for you.

Elections are not in any way "measures of popularity". They're an "either/or". For simple nonworking brains like yours it's sometimes useful to use a parable:

Suppose you were on a lonely road driving in the middle of the night and desperately hungry. You come upon a diner. They only have two things on the menu --- one is a can of Spaghetti-Os that's been sitting for a while. The other is ocelot shit soup with mealybugs and a warm glass of battery acid. If you order the Spaghetti-Os, that doesn't make it "popular".

Ponder that for a year or two. Maybe something will seep in.

So you think either:

A. The population of California grew by more than the difference, all eligible to vote, and voted in a wildly disproportionate share for Hillary. You realize that a big share of California's increase, year to year, are those not eligible to vote. Right?

Or

B. Hillary was so wildly more popular than Obama that she amassed more votes than him.

It is amazing that this happens in s State that allows undocumented aliens the right to a drivers licence.

Curious.

 

[beagle9]

The Clintons are the most repugnant of people… Fact

53 percent of Americans do not understand the word repugnant

. Your right, they've learned to embrace Miley Cyrus, Madonna, Beyonce, that rapper Hillary is a fan of, Michael Moore, and the list is just endless these days.