Gee, I notice USArmyRetired is MIA following the predictable decision. I wonder now if he understands this:
The court effectively killed the Kerchner case with one terse statement: "The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied."
Oh he probably understands it better than you understand this
"You need justice to resolve conflicts between people, and when justice is denied people continue to go after each other in a savage way. We did not get justice, " Apuzzo told WND. "For the court to deny our justice sets the country back terribly."
Or that there is a reason Obama has spent MILLIONS in legal fees to keep his birth certificate buried.
The SCOTUS is probably unwilling to hear the case because they know the chaos that would follow would leave us vulnerable to attack. And the thought of Biden stepping in is probably terrifying even to Justice Roberts.
USAR didn't understand the implication of the USSC "allowing" the brief to be docketed. Many of us tried every whichway but up his ass to explain it to him, but he still insisted it was a joyous occasion that the USSC was finally going to "hear" the arguments (part of which you quoted), and that was not the case. No, he did NOT understand. And by the way, just because some attorney
says he didn't get justice hardly means justice was not done.
If a response (answer) to a complaint is not filed, however frivolous it is, the defendant will automatically LOSE by default. The millions in attorneys fees were paid to defend the multiple complaints filed. And, of course, the responding "defense" was that the entire complaint and the nonstop revisions and refilings were based on non-facts and presumptions.