Breaking! Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office

[Slade3200]

A big win for Trump. With this ruling setting precedent, you can kiss the Georgia case by Fanni Willis goodbye. Trump did nothing wrong in that case.

Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office

Trump is not totally in the clear, as the judge ruled that statements he made after leaving the White House are not protected.

justthenews.com

Why didn’t the judge throw out the case?

 

[Blaster]

Why didn’t the judge throw out the case?

Because you don't like the ruling?

 

[SC Patriot]

Yes, Abrams and Gore did the same damn thing.

Well, Abrams is a progressive and Gore is a climate change advocate....so they are allowed to do it.

Only Republicans and Conservatives are bad bad bad people.

 

[Billiejeens]

I didnt.

Is it not against the law to take a photo of your completed ballot in your state?

 

[Billiejeens]

Useless debater. “NO”
Well, YES!

Nothing to debate.
I corrected you.
He is not protected by the 1st amendment.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How can it he was president of the whole country?

Because the case is a state level case along with the judge. A judge from Georgia does not have to abide by a ruling of a state judge in a different state.

 

[Lastamender]

Because the case is a state level case along with the judge. A judge from Georgia does not have to abide by a ruling of a state judge in a different state.

So the judge in GA. has no knowledge of a president's protections. He or she better bone up.

 

[Rigby5]

No he isn't. If your saying something that you know to be false, that causes damages to another individual you aren't protected under the first amendment. Just ask Fox News.

Not quite.

What you are referring to is slander and libel, and that required 3 parties.
It is where you tell party A that party B did something they did not do, in order to get party A to illegally harm party B, and that is libel or slander.
Party B has to be innocent and yet still harmed without having done anything.

If you tell someone something you know to be false, like to make money investing in bitcoin, that is not illegal even if it causes them harm.
That is because you did not make them do it, and it was still their choice.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So the judge in GA. has no knowledge of a president's protections. He or she better bone up.

Or the judge in Ga does not agree that the POTUS is above the law.

 

[Lastamender]

Or the judge in Ga does not agree that the POTUS is above the law.

He agrees Comey is and all the very corrupt GA. officials.. Or so it seems.

 

[Cougarbear]

The 1st doesn’t protect against all speech… liable is an example

As I already said, liable is extremely difficult to prosecute because of the high standards. In this case, there is no judge that would let a liberal jury convict on this. Don't get me wrong. Democrats are dumb enough to try because they weaponized politics. Funny to watch Democrats and their media when Biden is now on the hot seat. Everything Democrats tried against Trump is now starting to be used against Biden and they call foul. Funny as heck! What goes around comes around.

 

[Cougarbear]

Nothing to debate.
I corrected you.
He is not protected by the 1st amendment.

As any citizen is, he is. I know you liberal communists don't want our bill of rights. But, we have them and we won't give them up without a real fight.

 

[Hum Dinger]

A big win for Trump. With this ruling setting precedent, you can kiss the Georgia case by Fanni Willis goodbye. Trump did nothing wrong in that case.

Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office

Trump is not totally in the clear, as the judge ruled that statements he made after leaving the White House are not protected.

justthenews.com

"Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge"



Did they get Mickey Mouse's opinion as well?

 

[conserveguy877]

Trump and free speech win again!

 

[Cougarbear]

"Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge"



Did they get Mickey Mouse's opinion as well?

Trump is in the clear...MAGA!

 

[forkup]

Assuming it does not get shot down in its own state by a higher court

Of course.

 

[forkup]

Not quite.

What you are referring to is slander and libel, and that required 3 parties.
It is where you tell party A that party B did something they did not do, in order to get party A to illegally harm party B, and that is libel or slander.
Party B has to be innocent and yet still harmed without having done anything.

If you tell someone something you know to be false, like to make money investing in bitcoin, that is not illegal even if it causes them harm.
That is because you did not make them do it, and it was still their choice.

point taken

 

[Slade3200]

Because you don't like the ruling?

Huh? Was that supposed to be an answer to my question?

I have no issues with the ruling

 

[Slade3200]

As I already said, liable is extremely difficult to prosecute because of the high standards. In this case, there is no judge that would let a liberal jury convict on this. Don't get me wrong. Democrats are dumb enough to try because they weaponized politics. Funny to watch Democrats and their media when Biden is now on the hot seat. Everything Democrats tried against Trump is now starting to be used against Biden and they call foul. Funny as heck! What goes around comes around.

Trump has 3 different indictments and you think Biden is in the hot seat?! Haha you watch too much propaganda media that’s trying to use that as a distraction. In the real world there are real charges filed by our legal system against Trump. Law and order. The constitution… remember those things??

 

[Slade3200]

Trump has 3 different indictments and you think Biden is in the hot seat?! Haha you watch too much propaganda media that’s trying to use that as a distraction. In the real world there are real charges filed by our legal system against Trump. Law and order. The constitution… remember those things??

lantern2814 what’s fake about my statement? Explain yourself