Off point? Lmao
You said it was unconstitutional. I posted what legal scholars said about it. Thatās as ON POINT as anyone can be.
You a legal scholar or just think you are?
Do you understand what I have been complaining about?
A judge cannot prevent the executive from recending one of the executive's policies. The SCOTUS has no authority to review an act of Congress to repeal a law. Such an act to get rid of a law is not subject to judicial review.
Are we on the same page now?
The scope of what actions the judiciary is authorised to review is so clear and well settled that there can be no excuse for this judge's actions. It was deliberate misconduct for political reasons, calling into question this judge's ability to ever act in an impartial fashion, or his ability to put aside his personal opinions and political views, and make decisions based on the law.
This is such a law school 101 issue, this judge is completely unfit and should be impeached and removed.
Get it?