Breaking: Democrats and Leftist Media Dread As Tucker Carlson to Fully Reveal January 6 Truth Tonight.

[Delldude]

Well, here we are some time later since the grand reveal.

Three weeks, idiot. Can't even get a hearing for a speeding ticket in that short a time.

 

[Winco]

Who do you think ordered the Capitol Police to make Chansley the GUEST OF HONOR???

No One.
Just your wacko mind.

He enters in the front door and you insist he entered privately through the garage.
Wow.

 

[Faun]

Three weeks, idiot. Can't even get a hearing for a speeding ticket in that short a time.

It takes maybe an hour to file a motion to dismiss.

 

[Delldude]

It takes maybe an hour to file a motion to dismiss.

Then what? Judge says 'ok you can go home'?

 

[Faun]

Then what? Judge says 'ok you can go home'?

No, then the other side responds and then the judge rules.

But none of that happens unless the defendant files a motion to dismiss. Which again, only takes as long as needed to type one up and file it with the court.

So again I ask, since you didn't answer...

Who besides Spaz filed a motion to dismiss based on Tucker's videos?

 

[Delldude]

No, then the other side responds and then the judge rules.

But none of that happens unless the defendant files a motion to dismiss. Which again, only takes as long as needed to type one up and file it with the court.

So again I ask, since you didn't answer...

Who besides Spaz filed a motion to dismiss based on Tucker's videos?

Who is Spaz?

 

[Faun]

Who is Spaz?

The lone defendant who did file a motion to dismiss based on Tucker's videos.

 

[Delldude]

The lone defendant who did file a motion to dismiss based on Tucker's videos.

Pezzola?

 

[Faun]

Pezzola?

Yes.

 

[Delldude]

Yes.

Others have requested delays, based on footage. US wigged over that.

 

[Faun]

Others have requested delays, based on footage. US wigged over that.

Because there was no reason. Nearly everything Tucker showed had already been released to defendant's in trial and much of the rest would be a security risk to reveal.

 

[Delldude]

Because there was no reason. Nearly everything Tucker showed had already been released to defendant's in trial and much of the rest would be a security risk to reveal.

Screw the security risk BS. Defense atty's said they didn't have that footage, US says they 'had access to it'. Someone's BSing.

 

[Faun]

Screw the security risk BS. Defense atty's said they didn't have that footage, US says they 'had access to it'. Someone's BSing.

And prosecutors said they do. And they're not going to release anything they consider a security risk.

Doesn't matter anyway since there is nothing exculpatory on those videos.

 

[Delldude]

And they're not going to release anything they consider a security risk.

That makes it easy-peasy, doesn't it? Capitol police released the entire vid's to McCarthy.

Doesn't matter anyway since there is nothing exculpatory on those videos.

Depending on what the defense knows regarding the charges, it might.

 

[Faun]

That makes it easy-peasy, doesn't it? Capitol police released the entire vid's to McCarthy.

Depending on what the defense knows regarding the charges, it might.

No, they did not release every second of video. House members screened the video for security clearance before releasing it.

And there's nothing exculpatory. If there's video of someone committing a crime that is being used to try them, other video showing they didn't commit a crime is not evidence the former videos did not actually happen.

 

[Lastamender]

No, they did not release every second of video. House members screened the video for security clearance before releasing it.

And there's nothing exculpatory. If there's video of someone committing a crime that is being used to try them, other video showing they didn't commit a crime is not evidence the former videos did not actually happen.

Why aren't all the people that smashed things arrested identified and jailed? Because they were FBI or working with them. Period.

 

[Vrenn]

No, they did not release every second of video. House members screened the video for security clearance before releasing it.

And there's nothing exculpatory. If there's video of someone committing a crime that is being used to try them, other video showing they didn't commit a crime is not evidence the former videos did not actually happen.

Here is a confusing thought. If there is something that shows that they clearly committed a crime, how are you going to come up with a video showing that they did not commit a crime? They either did or they didn't. The BS that is trying to show that there was no crimes committed is just plain stupid. We are dealing with a bunch of MoRons who believes that everyone else is dumber than they are.

 

[Faun]

Why aren't all the people that smashed things arrested identified and jailed? Because they were FBI or working with them. Period.

No, ya flamin' idiot. Some people who either attacked police or went into the Capitol building or both; were not identified.

 

[Delldude]

No, they did not release every second of video. House members screened the video for security clearance before releasing it.

Yes they did according to a CP person. He said if congress wants it, they have to give it...in it's entirety. I already posted the quote on another thread.

 

[EMH]

No One.
Just your wacko mind.

He enters in the front door and you insist he entered privately through the garage.
Wow.

LOL!!!!


Show us the footage of the Capitol Police first engaging SHEmon....

You won't.

1.6 committee won't

Zionist Fascist Faux "News" host Tucker Carlson won't



Because he was the GUEST OF HONOR. No other time do the Capitol Police Officers STAND AT ATTENTION for a GUEST unless the GUEST is declared GUEST OF HONOR


Sick truth is Tucker Carlson and Faux are once again PROTECTING DYKEY NANCY's HATE HOAX