Breaking: 9th Circuit Issues Ruling Not To Protect America's Sovereignty

[DigitalDrifter]

Thank you, Lady Justice!

Don't think this is over Pocahontas.

 

[Defiant1]

Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.

"Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation"

What you said, I just pointed this out myself before in this thread and I cited the exact part of the US Constitution where President Trump can put America under Martial Law.

Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Also Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution states:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

You never answered how the president is granted authority to suspend habeas corpus unilaterally from Article 1 of the Constitution which grants powers to the Congress and not the executive.

Martial law on the national level may be declared by Congress or the president.

Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel Invasions."

Under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution it declares that "the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States."

Neither constitutional provision includes a direct reference to martial law. However, the Supreme Court has interpreted both to allow the declaration of martial law by the president or Congress.

So, in other words, the Constitution does not grant that power to the president whatsoever, and Chief Justice Taney was correct in Ex Parte Merryman that the president may not do so unilaterally.

Only if you ignore 8 US code 1182 (f)

 

[beagle9]

Our courts are now in charge of foreign policy. Absurd.

Bullshit.


If an EO affects rights the courts must be involved.

We elected a PRESIDENT not a DICTATOR.


.

His EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.

The point is,Trump lost

Till the next terrorist attack. Then Trump gets off Scott free. And the blame, and responsibility falls right into the liberals, and democrats laps; sealing thier fate.

Uuuuuunfortunately the terrorists who did 9/11 were all from countries not on the list, and killed 2800 Americans. Pakistan, which harbored its mastermind, is also not on the list.

Meanwhile (again) the total death by terrorism from the countries that ARE on the list continues to be Zero.

Tell us all about "Scott free" [sic]. Who enslaved Scott?

. Matters not if the terrorist weren't from the places on the list, but that the locations on the list could prove to be dangerous for us at the time these list are created. I'm sure that the list will change as circumstances change in the world. Right now these are the locations of concern.

 

[brummelben]

HOW?

The supreme court or if that fails he can rephrase the order and pass it through the house. Any senator or congressman that votes against these measures will be putting Americans at risk. He will get his way. The President usually does one way or another.

Thats about the dumbest most ignorant post of the day

 

[brummelben]

Bullshit.


If an EO affects rights the courts must be involved.

We elected a PRESIDENT not a DICTATOR.


.

His EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.

The point is,Trump lost

Till the next terrorist attack. Then Trump gets off Scott free. And the blame, and responsibility falls right into the liberals, and democrats laps; sealing thier fate.

Uuuuuunfortunately the terrorists who did 9/11 were all from countries not on the list, and killed 2800 Americans. Pakistan, which harbored its mastermind, is also not on the list.

Meanwhile (again) the total death by terrorism from the countries that ARE on the list continues to be Zero.

Tell us all about "Scott free" [sic]. Who enslaved Scott?

. Matters not if the terrorist weren't from the places on the list, but that the locations on the list could prove to be dangerous for us at the time these list are created. I'm sure that the list will change as circumstances change in the world. Right now these are the locations of concern.

Why are Iranian citizens a concern. They are amongst the most pro USA people on earth

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Update! One of the judges is a Jewess.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/judges-blocked-trump-appointed-barack-obama-jimmy-carter/

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Funny how the 9th Circus thought it fine when Obama did it.

Well Obama's ban on Iraqi refugees, while similar, had a much smaller scope than Trump's order.

For a much better reason.

 

[Rambunctious]

This ain't over until the fat lady sings;

 

[vlad_hombre]

When am I gonna get tired of winning?

Waiting for it ....

 

[Maryland Patriot]

This is insane. If an enemy attacks us, are we supposed to wait for permission from judges to defend ourselves?

we should put those judges on the front line, Im sure they could reason with the enemy and make them leave. maybe give them a gift basket or something.

 

[Rambunctious]

Thats about the dumbest most ignorant post of the day

Thank God you think so.......phew!

 

[brummelben]

Update! One of the judges is a Jewess.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/judges-blocked-trump-appointed-barack-obama-jimmy-carter/

A Jew? Really? That sounds dangerous, you scum sucker

 

[beagle9]

Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.

Where in the Constitution does it give the president authority to ban anyone from entering the country? Not Article 2 where the president's powers are listed. Also, who's Marshall, and what on Earth is "unexceptable?"

. Just following along, so maybe I am confused as to where they said Trump gets the power to do what he has done or wants to do. Wasn't it the Constitution?? Am I spelling Marshal law wrong ? Isn't that what is implemented when the countries security is threatened from within ??

The president wrote an executive order, but that doesn't mean he had the authority from the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant the president the power to ban anyone from entering the country. You're thinking martial law.

. Wow, listening to the arguments he has the authority, but this political leftist court says no ?? Looking at their rulings over the years, it is amazing that anyone takes this court seriously.

 

[Contumacious]

His EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.

The point is,Trump lost

Till the next terrorist attack. Then Trump gets off Scott free. And the blame, and responsibility falls right into the liberals, and democrats laps; sealing thier fate.

Uuuuuunfortunately the terrorists who did 9/11 were all from countries not on the list, and killed 2800 Americans. Pakistan, which harbored its mastermind, is also not on the list.

Meanwhile (again) the total death by terrorism from the countries that ARE on the list continues to be Zero.

Tell us all about "Scott free" [sic]. Who enslaved Scott?

. Matters not if the terrorist weren't from the places on the list, but that the locations on the list could prove to be dangerous for us at the time these list are created. I'm sure that the list will change as circumstances change in the world. Right now these are the locations of concern.

Why are Iranian citizens a concern. They are amongst the most pro USA people on earth

Remember DJT's policy is ISRAEL FIRST

SO he is Bibi's mouthpiece.


.

 

[brummelben]

Why is this court reviewing, and then ruling on something that is legal, and right to do under the Constitution ?? It appears that the left once again is trying to rule this nation by proxy, and in this case it used the 9th circuit to cause troubles for Americans. Might be getting near to Trump calling for Marshall Law in this country, because it appears that there are those here who are giving aid and comfort to the enemies of this nation, and that is unexceptable to most Americans on what is going on now.

Where in the Constitution does it give the president authority to ban anyone from entering the country? Not Article 2 where the president's powers are listed. Also, who's Marshall, and what on Earth is "unexceptable?"

. Just following along, so maybe I am confused as to where they said Trump gets the power to do what he has done or wants to do. Wasn't it the Constitution?? Am I spelling Marshal law wrong ? Isn't that what is implemented when the countries security is threatened from within ??

The president wrote an executive order, but that doesn't mean he had the authority from the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant the president the power to ban anyone from entering the country. You're thinking martial law.

. Wow, listening to the arguments he has the authority, but this political leftist court says no ?? Looking at their rulings over the years, it is amazing that anyone takes this court seriously.

At what point did you become a constitutional expert?

 

[Rambunctious]

we should put those judges on the front line, Im sure they could reason with the enemy and make them leave. maybe give them a gift basket or something

If some refugee goes berserk and kills a bunch of Americans they should be forced to explain themselves and then removed from the bench for good.

 

[brummelben]

we should put those judges on the front line, Im sure they could reason with the enemy and make them leave. maybe give them a gift basket or something

If some refugee goes berserk and kills a bunch of Americans they should be forced to explain themselves and then removed from the bench for good.

Is that how our judicial system works? In the meantime, just hide under your bed

 

[Hutch Starskey]

These judges have transferred national security authority from the executive branch to the judicial branch.

Tyranny

Please show where national security is irreparably harmed by removing this order.

Make your case.

 

[beagle9]

Our courts are now in charge of foreign policy. Absurd.

Bullshit.


If an EO affects rights the courts must be involved.

We elected a PRESIDENT not a DICTATOR.


.

His EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.

The point is,Trump lost

Till the next terrorist attack. Then Trump gets off Scott free. And the blame, and responsibility falls right into the liberals, and democrats laps; sealing thier fate.

Uuuuuunfortunately the terrorists who did 9/11 were all from countries not on the list, and killed 2800 Americans. Pakistan, which harbored its mastermind, is also not on the list.

Meanwhile (again) the total death by terrorism from the countries that ARE on the list continues to be Zero.

Tell us all about "Scott free" [sic]. Who enslaved Scott?

. Trump went light on the ban out of respect for by partisanship to happen, but the left took his list and are using his idea to work with them against him. Wow.

 

[Rambunctious]

Is that how our judicial system works? In the meantime, just hide under your bed

Our judicial system is broken, it doesn't work. The political ruling today proves it. But it really doesn't matter. Trump can still slow down immigration in many other ways.