Bragg’s Pursuit of Trump Violates the Sixth Amendment

[WorldWatcher]

Yes. What crime was that? Having consensual sex with a floozy is not illegal. Neither is paying her for an NDA.

Correct in both counts.

As to what crimes was he aiding and attempting to conceal, they were the basis of Cohen's conviction. Trump is listed in Cohen's court documents as "Individual 1" just as Cohen is listed in Trump court documents as "Lawyer A".
.
.
.
.

 

[WorldWatcher]

So your assumption is these are felony charges against Trump because he was trying to cover the specific crime that Cohen was convicted of?

No, it's not an assumption.

The indictment exists, the Statement of Facts exists. Those documents were submitted to the court yesterday. That is the case the documents layout.

WW

 

[OldFlame]

Correct.



They did, it's in the Statement of Facts submitted to the court yesterday.

WW

Then why did he respond to that exact question put to him by the reporter that he is under no obligation to to reveal that or answer that at this time?

Has someone posted the 'statement of fact' in this thread, if so I missed it.

 

[Billiejeens]

And you claim to have a graduate degree? LOL...

Wow.

I think you should have someone explain the statute to you a bit more.

You do it.
I am happy to listen.

 

[Billiejeens]

To be fair it has been noted that he has to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find a lawyer now.

Noted by people who don't know what the fuck they are talking about.

 

[Billiejeens]

Damn, I wonder why Trump's lawyers did not think of this

Why do you think that they haven't?

 

[jc456]

And you claim to have a graduate degree? LOL...

Wow.

I think you should have someone explain the statute to you a bit more.

what was the second crime that made his other record keeping a felony?

 

[Billiejeens]

Withholding exculpatory evidence from the Grand Jury...

Leaking sealed Grand Jury information...

As usual, Democrats continue to break laws in their attempt to 'Get Trump' ... and are never held accountable.

(1) is wrong

(2 and 3) - correct

 

[jc456]

That’s a misdemeanor, past the statute of limitations.

So the Dems are spending $100 million to prosecute a harmless misdemeanor, while ignoring the classified docs Biden stole and left in plain sight while simultaneously getting millions in payoffs from America’s enemies.

Braggs only has a 51% conviction rate on real crime. hahhahahahahahahaha what a fking loser. New Yorkers must really feel safe with him! hahhahhahahhahaahahaahaha

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why do you think that they haven't?

They spoke at length after the indictment. A slam dunk like this would have been the first thing to be brought up if it were valid.

 

[Billiejeens]

No he didn’t. He named a civil misdemeanor past the statute of limitations, tied to a future unspecified felony crime Trump intends to commit.

Knock-knock: You’re being arrested, Moonglow.
Moonglow: For what?
KK: You intend to commit a felony.
MG: What felony?
KK: Just something. We’re not saying. Now get to Court.

You aren't wrong.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Braggs only has a 51% conviction rate on real crime.

How does that compare to his predecessor?

How does that compare to other DAs in large cities?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Then why did he respond to that exact question put to him by the reporter that he is under no obligation to to reveal that or answer that at this time?

The context of his reply was why wasn't it in the indictment, which is true.

Has someone posted the 'statement of fact' in this thread, if so I missed it.

Yes, I have.

WW

 

[jc456]

As usual, the demofks in here puked on their keyboards.

 

[WorldWatcher]

what was the second crime that made his other record keeping a felony?

Cohen's federal conviction.

WW

 

[Billiejeens]

They spoke at length after the indictment. A slam dunk like this would have been the first thing to be brought up if it were valid.

There are multiple slam dunks.
Cases are not tried at press conferences.
I'm sorry that you don't know that.

 

[jc456]

Cohen's federal conviction.

WW

hahaahahahahahahahahahaha of course. What was I thinking.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There are multiple slam dunks.
Cases are not tried at press conferences.
I'm sorry that you don't know that.

We shall see.

The next hearing is Dec 4th

 

[jc456]

And you claim to have a graduate degree? LOL...

Wow.

I think you should have someone explain the statute to you a bit more.

educate us on what the statute is.

ready for the deflection?

 

[Billiejeens]

We shall see.

The next hearing is Dec 4th

There will be a plethora of motions filed between now and that date.