2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,559
- 52,806
- 2,290
The Brady gun control group sent out a tweet condemning state sanctioned gun violence…..pointing out exactly why we have the 2nd Amendment…..
Today, we remember the students shot and killed at #KentState: Allison Beth Krause Jeffrey Glenn Miller Sandra Lee Scheuer William Knox Schroeder Half a century later, unnecessary state-sanctioned gun violence continues to kill Americans, especially Black + Native Americans
—————————
However, what is true is that Brady is talking about “state-sanctioned gun violence” while simultaneously doing everything they can to make it so the state is the only one with guns in the first place.
—————-
We also should remember that Kent State wasn’t the police. It was the National Guard. That’s military. There’s absolutely no push by Brady to disarm or restrict the military from having certain weapons, now is there?
Yet if state-sanctioned homicide is a problem that we should be prepared to address, how in the hell are we to do that if ordinary citizens are disarmed?
Without an armed populace, Kent State would cease being a historical anomaly and become simply the first of numerous other atrocities.
After all, I’m sure the people at Brady can think of a number of politicians they distrust with power. Everyone can.
If one of them gained power, though, and didn’t have to worry about an armed populace, just what would they do? Just how badly would they shift our nation on the spectrum between freedom and tyranny?
————
You can’t argue about state-sanctioned gun violence on one hand and then demand that only the state have guns. That just doesn’t make any sense.
bearingarms.com
Today, we remember the students shot and killed at #KentState: Allison Beth Krause Jeffrey Glenn Miller Sandra Lee Scheuer William Knox Schroeder Half a century later, unnecessary state-sanctioned gun violence continues to kill Americans, especially Black + Native Americans
—————————
However, what is true is that Brady is talking about “state-sanctioned gun violence” while simultaneously doing everything they can to make it so the state is the only one with guns in the first place.
—————-
We also should remember that Kent State wasn’t the police. It was the National Guard. That’s military. There’s absolutely no push by Brady to disarm or restrict the military from having certain weapons, now is there?
Yet if state-sanctioned homicide is a problem that we should be prepared to address, how in the hell are we to do that if ordinary citizens are disarmed?
Without an armed populace, Kent State would cease being a historical anomaly and become simply the first of numerous other atrocities.
After all, I’m sure the people at Brady can think of a number of politicians they distrust with power. Everyone can.
If one of them gained power, though, and didn’t have to worry about an armed populace, just what would they do? Just how badly would they shift our nation on the spectrum between freedom and tyranny?
————
You can’t argue about state-sanctioned gun violence on one hand and then demand that only the state have guns. That just doesn’t make any sense.

Brady tweet actually runs counter to their cause
