Boycott Staples

[Disir]

You're such a ******* dirt bag. Back on ignore you're ignorant ass goes.

You are an ignorant troll. You have less than a Jr. High education and you got your ass handed to you.

Yep, she won't even address my questions because it would show her totally out of it. The legislation she has been going on about hasn't even been voted on by the house and we all know anything passed by the house will go to reids desk to die.

It was passed in 2006.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Do you always project your own faults on others when stoned?

Ok, so you've got nothing. Again. Get back to me when you have an argument that isn't watching you have a melt down and lying through your teeth.

And...you're projecting, again and still.

 

[Disir]

Do you always project your own faults on others when stoned?

Ok, so you've got nothing. Again. Get back to me when you have an argument that isn't watching you have a melt down and lying through your teeth.

And...you're projecting, again and still.

Get an argument. Thus far, you have brought nothing to the table.

 

[Disir]

You're such a ******* dirt bag. Back on ignore you're ignorant ass goes.

You are an ignorant troll. You have less than a Jr. High education and you got your ass handed to you.

Yep, she won't even address my questions because it would show her totally out of it. The legislation she has been going on about hasn't even been voted on by the house and we all know anything passed by the house will go to reids desk to die.

H.R. 6407 (109th): Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act

Introduced:
Dec 07, 2006 (109th Congress, 2005–2006)
Status:
Signed by the President
Slip Law:
This bill became Pub.L. 109-435.

 

[Jarlaxle]

those teeny tiny little boxes hold more mail than most peoples home boxes...

They don't hold my books.

thats what those big boxes on the bottom are for.....they are called parcel boxes.....

Yeah...they're not always quite big enough. Which can result in idiocy like this...

From another board, italics in original:
"That reminds me. I owned a DDG for a long, long time and eventually sold it on eBay after acquiring a mint condition copy. Well, I sent it in a padded envelope. The mailman folded the hardcover book so that it could fit into the buyer's mailbox. Luckily I shipped with insurance, but that was a wonderful book that now has permanent crease lines on the covers and is irrevocably ruined. I felt bad for the buyer, even though she got her money back from the Post Office. Now I ship hardcovers in boxes."

 

[buckeye45_73]

Because it's continued destruction of the middle class.

Which is also the reason why some (middle class) rw's will shop there.

Like I've said before, we now have an entire political party running on the promises to make you poor and keep you poor while trashing the US. Amazingly, there are some who are in favor of this.

Democrats like you


I find it funny its a govt agency, the post office that is doing it. Must be a double dagger eh?

 

[OKTexas]

You are an ignorant troll. You have less than a Jr. High education and you got your ass handed to you.

Yep, she won't even address my questions because it would show her totally out of it. The legislation she has been going on about hasn't even been voted on by the house and we all know anything passed by the house will go to reids desk to die.

It was passed in 2006.

Not the one I was referring to, you went on and on about the one in the house put out in Issa's committee. You know this one, Postal Reform Act 2013 go back and review your post, you claimed Issa had so much to personally gain and then refused to back it up. All you provided was irrelevant links that didn't support your bullshit. Care to try again? While you're at it tell the class the status of the bill you seem to be so concerned about.

 

[boilermaker55]

This is not hypocrisy at all. If anyone has the hypocrisy spewing from them its the likes of you.
You refuse to even justify that the posts prior make so much sense to the argument about what is really happening to the post office. But you refuse to read and understand.
All you can do is throw buzz words and talking points out. NO real substance just wind coming from your comments.
And maybe you need to understand the real meaning of some of the words you choose to spew.
Hypocrite!

Overpay! Is that our response.
You have no feelings about CEO's being OVERPAID in their jobs. Or are they justified by which means.
Plus a large bonus and stock options!
Why do they not buy stocks like all the rest of the real stock holders?
Overpay!

the EXCUSE the idiotic Left is using is that they are required to "overpay" for their own employees retirement benefits.
what you wont here from the idiotic Left here pretending they are letting you in on a big secret is that the issue of whether they are "overpaying" is highly debateable

think OBAMA'S HOMESTATE OF ILLINOIS; and the $100 BILLION HOLE the state is in for underfunded pensions

Typical socialist silliness. This isn't about overpaid CEO's but rather the impending implosion of the USPS which, at the moment, would cost the taxpayers at least $20b. Is it OK that we must clean up their mess. Is it OK that we all overpay for USPS services thanks, in part, to wages paid which are 2-3 times those in the real world for the same work? Is it OK with you that people who aren't USPS employees, many of whom earn far less, are burdened with paying for USPO's $25/hr clerks.
No?
Does the term "hypocrisy" show up in your dictionary?

 

[Disir]

Yep, she won't even address my questions because it would show her totally out of it. The legislation she has been going on about hasn't even been voted on by the house and we all know anything passed by the house will go to reids desk to die.

It was passed in 2006.

Not the one I was referring to, you went on and on about the one in the house put out in Issa's committee. You know this one, Postal Reform Act 2013 go back and review your post, you claimed Issa had so much to personally gain and then refused to back it up. All you provided was irrelevant links that didn't support your bullshit. Care to try again? While you're at it tell the class the status of the bill you seem to be so concerned about.

You dumb ass.

Go back and read what I wrote.

 

[Harry Dresden]

They don't hold my books.

thats what those big boxes on the bottom are for.....they are called parcel boxes.....

Yeah...they're not always quite big enough. Which can result in idiocy like this...

From another board, italics in original:
"That reminds me. I owned a DDG for a long, long time and eventually sold it on eBay after acquiring a mint condition copy. Well, I sent it in a padded envelope. The mailman folded the hardcover book so that it could fit into the buyer's mailbox. Luckily I shipped with insurance, but that was a wonderful book that now has permanent crease lines on the covers and is irrevocably ruined. I felt bad for the buyer, even though she got her money back from the Post Office. Now I ship hardcovers in boxes."

hey i have said there are shitty carriers.....a UPS driver on my route left a computer at a vacant house and it rained like hell the next 2 days.....it belonged on the next street.....so there are crappy workers.....

 

[freedombecki]

America is losing its competitive edge worldwide, and China is forging ahead competitively.

That and abortion are destroying the American Middle Class. Abortion has destroyed 45,000,000 Americans since 1973, and the Union make-a-wish pay scale has taken American automobiles to such a high price, they aren't sold worldwide as before, so we lost a huge market share by being uncompetitive with foreigners who've taken over the market with cheaper goods that work reliably, because America also took its technology overseas, which was quickly snapped up and converted for free to be in competition with America.

The buck stops at America's supreme lack of street smarts in Congress, which won't be able to ever put America back together again with wealth redistribution that takes away from the hard worker who saved his money, and wealth redistribution frosts the cake for the irresponsible, leaving the hard worker wondering why he worked so hard to get ahead when political tricksters stole his pursuit of happiness to pay for the Congress's pet rock projects.

 

[Disir]

America is losing its competitive edge worldwide, and China is forging ahead competitively.

That and abortion are destroying the American Middle Class. Abortion has destroyed 45,000,000 Americans since 1973, and the Union make-a-wish pay scale has taken American automobiles to such a high price, they aren't sold worldwide as before, so we lost a huge market share by being uncompetitive with foreigners who've taken over the market with cheaper goods that work reliably, because America also took its technology overseas, which was quickly snapped up and converted for free to be in competition with America.

The buck stops at America's supreme lack of street smarts in Congress, which won't be able to ever put America back together again with wealth redistribution that takes away from the hard worker who saved his money, and wealth redistribution frosts the cake for the irresponsible, leaving the hard worker wondering why he worked so hard to get ahead when political tricksters stole his pursuit of happiness to pay for the Congress's pet rock projects.

Great. So, you dislike the dismantling of the Post Office as well.

 

[OKTexas]

It was passed in 2006.

Not the one I was referring to, you went on and on about the one in the house put out in Issa's committee. You know this one, Postal Reform Act 2013 go back and review your post, you claimed Issa had so much to personally gain and then refused to back it up. All you provided was irrelevant links that didn't support your bullshit. Care to try again? While you're at it tell the class the status of the bill you seem to be so concerned about.

You dumb ass.

Go back and read what I wrote.

Nope, I asked you about what you wrote at the time, you did then exactly what you're doing now, trying to sidestep the questions. So if you want to keep doing that, with all due respect, **** off.

 

[PredFan]

Yay! I've always shopped at Staples, mainly because it's close. Now I'll be looking forward to it.

 

[SAYIT]

Overpay! Is that our response.
You have no feelings about CEO's being OVERPAID in their jobs. Or are they justified by which means.
Plus a large bonus and stock options!
Why do they not buy stocks like all the rest of the real stock holders?
Overpay!

Typical socialist silliness. This isn't about overpaid CEO's but rather the impending implosion of the USPS which, at the moment, would cost the taxpayers at least $20b. Is it OK that we must clean up their mess. Is it OK that we all overpay for USPS services thanks, in part, to wages paid which are 2-3 times those in the real world for the same work? Is it OK with you that people who aren't USPS employees, many of whom earn far less, are burdened with paying for USPO's $25/hr clerks.
No?
Does the term "hypocrisy" show up in your dictionary?

This is not hypocrisy at all. If anyone has the hypocrisy spewing from them its the likes of you.
You refuse to even justify that the posts prior make so much sense to the argument about what is really happening to the post office. But you refuse to read and understand.
All you can do is throw buzz words and talking points out. NO real substance just wind coming from your comments.
And maybe you need to understand the real meaning of some of the words you choose to spew.
Hypocrite!

Interesting. Rather than refute any of the facts in my post - many gleaned from opening and reading links in this thread - you simply squeal like a stuck pig.
Lemme guess ... you're a socialist?

 

[PredFan]

I love it when those greedy union ***** screw themselves.

 

[Disir]

Not the one I was referring to, you went on and on about the one in the house put out in Issa's committee. You know this one, Postal Reform Act 2013 go back and review your post, you claimed Issa had so much to personally gain and then refused to back it up. All you provided was irrelevant links that didn't support your bullshit. Care to try again? While you're at it tell the class the status of the bill you seem to be so concerned about.

You dumb ass.

Go back and read what I wrote.

Nope, I asked you about what you wrote at the time, you did then exactly what you're doing now, trying to sidestep the questions. So if you want to keep doing that, with all due respect, **** off.

Actually, I said that Issa and Donahoe are the problem. Harry said that he didn't think that Issa was involved. Issa is the one that started the alleged scandal that wasn't a scandal regarding the post office. The issue was tied to the 2006 law. You said, that he would be the 10th beneficiary and therefore you don't get it. It doesn't count. I mean why the hell would the guy create a scandal that wasn't a scandal if he was the 10th down the line? You can't possibly fathom how it is privatization and not a "business arrangement".

I said to you and provided you links with others that intend to profit.

You said, AND?

It's not the fact that I am not answering you. I have answered you just fine. You understand just fine.

You are perfectly fine with privatization. That is all.







I posted a link of what he has to gain.

 

[OKTexas]

You dumb ass.

Go back and read what I wrote.

Nope, I asked you about what you wrote at the time, you did then exactly what you're doing now, trying to sidestep the questions. So if you want to keep doing that, with all due respect, **** off.

Actually, I said that Issa and Donahoe are the problem. Harry said that he didn't think that Issa was involved. Issa is the one that started the alleged scandal that wasn't a scandal regarding the post office. The issue was tied to the 2006 law. You said, that he would be the 10th beneficiary and therefore you don't get it. It doesn't count. I mean why the hell would the guy create a scandal that wasn't a scandal if he was the 10th down the line? You can't possibly fathom how it is privatization and not a "business arrangement".

I said to you and provided you links with others that intend to profit.

You said, AND?

It's not the fact that I am not answering you. I have answered you just fine. You understand just fine.

You are perfectly fine with privatization. That is all.







I posted a link of what he has to gain.

Your link said Issa was tenth in line to receive postal union monies if the post office would become defunct. I questioned right after you posted that link how he could be tenth in line to receive anything from the postal union if the post office was defunct because the postal union would't exist in that scenario.

You also skipped right over the post where I said the PO has been privatizing for decades with contract rural carriers, contract trucking companies hauling mail between sorting centers and airline companies also carrying contract mail. I have had nothing but contract carriers where I live for the past 16+ years.

And you're right on one aspect, I have no problem with the privatization of retail PO functions if it allows them to close low performing post offices. I'll site one example, there is a PO ten miles from my house, I have to drive by it to get to my PO, another 7 miles down the same road. I rarely see more than 1 car at that PO at any given time, it should be closed.

You also said nothing once again about the bill I referred you to again.

 

[Disir]

Nope, I asked you about what you wrote at the time, you did then exactly what you're doing now, trying to sidestep the questions. So if you want to keep doing that, with all due respect, **** off.

Actually, I said that Issa and Donahoe are the problem. Harry said that he didn't think that Issa was involved. Issa is the one that started the alleged scandal that wasn't a scandal regarding the post office. The issue was tied to the 2006 law. You said, that he would be the 10th beneficiary and therefore you don't get it. It doesn't count. I mean why the hell would the guy create a scandal that wasn't a scandal if he was the 10th down the line? You can't possibly fathom how it is privatization and not a "business arrangement".

I said to you and provided you links with others that intend to profit.

You said, AND?

It's not the fact that I am not answering you. I have answered you just fine. You understand just fine.

You are perfectly fine with privatization. That is all.







I posted a link of what he has to gain.

Your link said Issa was tenth in line to receive postal union monies if the post office would become defunct. I questioned right after you posted that link how he could be tenth in line to receive anything from the postal union if the post office was defunct because the postal union would't exist in that scenario.

You also skipped right over the post where I said the PO has been privatizing for decades with contract rural carriers, contract trucking companies hauling mail between sorting centers and airline companies also carrying contract mail. I have had nothing but contract carriers where I live for the past 16+ years.

And you're right on one aspect, I have no problem with the privatization of retail PO functions if it allows them to close low performing post offices. I'll site one example, there is a PO ten miles from my house, I have to drive by it to get to my PO, another 7 miles down the same road. I rarely see more than 1 car at that PO at any given time, it should be closed.

You also said nothing once again about the bill I referred you to again.

I didn't say that he would benefit from union monies. He doesn't have to benefit from the union. He turned around and fucked the union. So, the question that you need to ask is what else (and where else) does he have to gain?

Here is the link.
How does Darrell Issa Benefit from the privatization of the United States Post Office (Special updates 2014)

Rural carriers have been contracting since 1962. End of story. NOT a reason to stop USPS for all delivery. It is not. The legislation and the faux scandal that Issa started is tied to the privatization. Issa starts a scandal that is not the scandal. It is intentional in an effort to destroy the post office. That is where we are at.

The contract for rural carriers starts at the above date. The forcing the benefits/retirement to be paid 75 years in advance starts in 2006.

What is it that you would like to discuss about this current legislation because it sure as hell is not repealing the damage done in the 2006 legislation. IS IT?

 

[Harry Dresden]

You dumb ass.

Go back and read what I wrote.

Nope, I asked you about what you wrote at the time, you did then exactly what you're doing now, trying to sidestep the questions. So if you want to keep doing that, with all due respect, **** off.

Actually, I said that Issa and Donahoe are the problem. Harry said that he didn't think that Issa was involved. Issa is the one that started the alleged scandal that wasn't a scandal regarding the post office. The issue was tied to the 2006 law. You said, that he would be the 10th beneficiary and therefore you don't get it. It doesn't count. I mean why the hell would the guy create a scandal that wasn't a scandal if he was the 10th down the line? You can't possibly fathom how it is privatization and not a "business arrangement".

I said to you and provided you links with others that intend to profit.

You said, AND?

It's not the fact that I am not answering you. I have answered you just fine. You understand just fine.

You are perfectly fine with privatization. That is all.







I posted a link of what he has to gain.

Issa wasnt even a co-sponsor of that bill....what scandal are you referring to?....