Boston black cops can't pass written test ... so they get "interviews" instead.

SAT does not grade anyone easier.

You mean they won't admit it but they do. Blacks get a huge break on the essay test since there are no "right" answers and the score is a judgement call. That's the idea for the essay test.

Whites do much better than blacks on the essay test dude.
Try again, next time with some proof and maybe some facts.
If you do not have any just make them up as you go.
 
You mean they won't admit it but they do. Blacks get a huge break on the essay.



Proof?

The burden of proof is on you since you are the one making the outrageous statement. The whole point of tests like the SAT is to measure a student's achievement precisely in contrast to the mushy measurement of using grades. Essay test grading is also a mushy judgement call and clearly does not belong on the SAT.

No, the SAT is a predictor of how well a student will do in college.
It is not an achievement test.
And you need to offer something, anything to back up your claims.
 
SAT does not grade anyone easier.

You mean they won't admit it but they do. Blacks get a huge break on the essay test since there are no "right" answers and the score is a judgement call. That's the idea for the essay test.

Whites do much better than blacks on the essay test dude.
Try again, next time with some proof and maybe some facts.
If you do not have any just make them up as you go.

As usual you can't read or think. I never said blacks do better than whites on the essay test. I claim blacks are given "help" by the graders. That reduces the gap but probably does not close it. Get your butt outta your head.
 
You mean they won't admit it but they do. Blacks get a huge break on the essay test since there are no "right" answers and the score is a judgement call. That's the idea for the essay test.

Whites do much better than blacks on the essay test dude.
Try again, next time with some proof and maybe some facts.
If you do not have any just make them up as you go.

As usual you can't read or think. I never said blacks do better than whites on the essay test. I claim blacks are given "help" by the graders. That reduces the gap but probably does not close it. Get your butt outta your head.

No they aren't.
Blacks are further behind now after the essay was initiated than they ever were.
Take a look at the stats. In Georgia especially.
Show us some hard data and proof that blacks get help from the graders.
If they did that would be front page news. College Entrance Examination Board would catch the heat for that one.
Put up or shut up. Show us some facts.
Or keep making it up as you go as you are very good at that.
 
I never said blacks do better than whites on the essay test. I claim blacks are given "help" by the graders.

Prove it, or admit you were just making shit up, you cowardly liar.

You are the coward and the liar. On any accurate test of intelligence or knowledge blacks are going to get average scores significantly below whites. You know that as well as anyone else does. You also know why it is true. :cool:
 

The burden of proof is on you .

Wrong, you illogical sack of shit. You made an assertion, so it is up to you to prove it. You can't, of course. You are a liar as well as a coward.

The SAT is not an IQ test, but it correlates with IQ. The following chart demonstrates that since the school year of 1986-87 whites have scored quite a bit higher than blacks on the average, and that the race gap has increaced.

Fast Facts
 
The burden of proof is on you .

Wrong, you illogical sack of shit. You made an assertion, so it is up to you to prove it. You can't, of course. You are a liar as well as a coward.

The SAT is not an IQ test, but it correlates with IQ. The following chart demonstrates that since the school year of 1986-87 whites have scored quite a bit higher than blacks on the average, and that the race gap has increaced.


If you're going to use the quote function, you might want to actually comment on what you quoted, moron.
 
Wrong, you illogical sack of shit. You made an assertion, so it is up to you to prove it. You can't, of course. You are a liar as well as a coward.

The SAT is not an IQ test, but it correlates with IQ. The following chart demonstrates that since the school year of 1986-87 whites have scored quite a bit higher than blacks on the average, and that the race gap has increaced.


If you're going to use the quote function, you might want to actually comment on what you quoted, moron.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 524. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 528. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 514. For blacks it was 411.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 535. For blacks it was 427.

Fast Facts

In other words, blacks started out way behind whites. During a period of 24 years they got further behind. This happened despite No Child Left Behind. One of the goals of No Child Left Behind was to bring blacks up to white standards.
 
from the link-

there is one Asian and no blacks, Hispanics, or women.

how many of those are there in the dept overall?


there are approx. 2,000 in the Boston PD.

when one moves up the ladder from Patrolmen, oops, I mean Patrolperson, I would be surprised IF all that counted was an exam score(?)

how about their record AS Cops? do results count? felony busts, etc.?
 
The SAT is not an IQ test, but it correlates with IQ. The following chart demonstrates that since the school year of 1986-87 whites have scored quite a bit higher than blacks on the average, and that the race gap has increaced.


If you're going to use the quote function, you might want to actually comment on what you quoted, moron.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 524. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 528. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 514. For blacks it was 411.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 535. For blacks it was 427.

Fast Facts

In other words, blacks started out way behind whites. During a period of 24 years they got further behind. This happened despite No Child Left Behind. One of the goals of No Child Left Behind was to bring blacks up to white standards.



You didn't bother reading what you quoted, did you moron? Go back to the beginning and stop making even more of an ass of yourself.
 
The SAT is not an IQ test, but it correlates with IQ. The following chart demonstrates that since the school year of 1986-87 whites have scored quite a bit higher than blacks on the average, and that the race gap has increaced.


If you're going to use the quote function, you might want to actually comment on what you quoted, moron.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 524. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 528. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 514. For blacks it was 411.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 535. For blacks it was 427.

Fast Facts

In other words, blacks started out way behind whites. During a period of 24 years they got further behind. This happened despite No Child Left Behind. One of the goals of No Child Left Behind was to bring blacks up to white standards.

This is just the facts. Why can't blacks perform like whites??? That's the question.
 
The SAT is not an IQ test, but it correlates with IQ. The following chart demonstrates that since the school year of 1986-87 whites have scored quite a bit higher than blacks on the average, and that the race gap has increaced.


If you're going to use the quote function, you might want to actually comment on what you quoted, moron.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 524. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 528. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 514. For blacks it was 411.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 535. For blacks it was 427.

Fast Facts

In other words, blacks started out way behind whites. During a period of 24 years they got further behind. This happened despite No Child Left Behind. One of the goals of No Child Left Behind was to bring blacks up to white standards.

I thought the tests were gamed and fixed for blacks to score higher as indicated by a few posts here.
Those stats debunk that theory.
 
SAT is not an intelligence test anyway. All it proclaims to be is an indicator of how well a freshman will do in college.
And not a very good indicator of that.
SAT is a great indicator of how poor the inner city public schools are.
 
If you're going to use the quote function, you might want to actually comment on what you quoted, moron.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 524. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in reading for whites was 528. For blacks it was 428.

During the school year of 1986 - 87 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 514. For blacks it was 411.

During the school year of 2010 - 11 the average SAT score in mathematics for whites was 535. For blacks it was 427.

Fast Facts

In other words, blacks started out way behind whites. During a period of 24 years they got further behind. This happened despite No Child Left Behind. One of the goals of No Child Left Behind was to bring blacks up to white standards.

I thought the tests were gamed and fixed for blacks to score higher as indicated by a few posts here.
Those stats debunk that theory.

Who's to say they wouldn't score lower if they weren't?
 

Forum List

Back
Top