Bondi Going Bye Bye

[jacksonlamb]

NAME A LIE OR ADMIT YOU ARE JUST A SHIT TALKER.

Pick almost anyone of your posts.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes. You were a loser then. You are a loser now. And you always will have lost that election. The courts did you a favor by cutting off your whining so early in the process.

I wasn’t a loser. That’s you. Stop projecting so much.

And this present discussion is not one involving “did Trump win?”

Go play in traffic.

 

[jacksonlamb]

You’re still conflating different matters.

You are failing at avoiding the debating gallows. You are standing of the trap, where Jon Koch is already pulling the lever.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Before you ever got to this message board (unless you’re just a sock, that is) the discussion here already dissected those cases. Cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. For example, on the courts determining a “lack of standing.”

You can pretend all you want that cases were dismissed on the “merits.” The claim of dismissal “on the merits” would have required actually having the hearings prior to dismissals.

You cannot prove they were not dismissed because of merits. That's on you. A judge(S) can dismiss prior to hearings on briefings that show no merits.

 

[jacksonlamb]

I wasn’t a loser. That’s you. Stop projecting so much.

And this present discussion is not one involving “did Trump win?”

Go play in traffic.

Most here would disagree with you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is a recognizable pattern, by now.

Trump appoints and hires unqualified, incompetent, corrupt people.

They -- astonishingly -- do poorly at their jobs and embarrass themselves and Donald Trump.

Trump then discards them like useless trash and replaces them with someone who manages to be even worse.

 

[JonKoch]

Before you ever got to this message board (unless you’re just a sock, that is) the discussion here already dissected those cases. Cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. For example, on the courts determining a “lack of standing.”

You can pretend all you want that cases were dismissed on the “merits.” The claim of dismissal “on the merits” would have required actually having the hearings prior to dismissals.

I get it Cupcake, many MAGATards lack reading comprehension skills

There were over 60 court cases where judges, including judges appointed by President Trump and other Republican presidents, looked at the evidence in many cases and said there is not widespread fraud."
CLC’s researched the cases. Some, as referenced by Rep. Cheney, were withdrawn by the Trump team before the courts ever ruled or dismissed on procedural grounds.

But many were decided on the merits.


Overall, the court found the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud to be speculative, filled with “guess-work,” and often unsubstantiated
Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and...

campaignlegal.org

 

[BackAgain]

Most here would disagree with you.

You can’t intelligently speak even for yourself. There’s no way you have any ability to speak for others.

 

[JonKoch]

Before you ever got to this message board (unless you’re just a sock, that is) the discussion here already dissected those cases. Cases were dismissed on procedural grounds. For example, on the courts determining a “lack of standing.”

You can pretend all you want that cases were dismissed on the “merits.” The claim of dismissal “on the merits” would have required actually having the hearings prior to dismissals.

Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and...

campaignlegal.org

 

[BackAgain]

I get it Cupcake, many MAGATards lack reading comprehension skills

There were over 60 court cases where judges, including judges appointed by President Trump and other Republican presidents, looked at the evidence in many cases and said there is not widespread fraud."
CLC’s researched the cases. Some, as referenced by Rep. Cheney, were withdrawn by the Trump team before the courts ever ruled or dismissed on procedural grounds.

But many were decided on the merits.


Overall, the court found the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud to be speculative, filled with “guess-work,” and often unsubstantiated
Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and...

campaignlegal.org

Your claims are simply untrue.

 

[Correll]

Pick almost anyone of your posts.

NAME A LIE OR ADMIT YOU ARE A SHIT TALKER.

 

[teddyearp]

Learn how to argue. There is such an error as "malicious prosecution'.

Admit that, then continue.

But there was probable cause. Admit that, then continue.

 

[odanny]

 

[teddyearp]

Why are you whining. You and your ilk have been calling for her ouster since she was nominated for that position. Do you know what you want? Make up your mind.

They have to have a mind first.

 

[jacksonlamb]

You can’t intelligently speak even for yourself. There’s no way you have any ability to speak for others.

Your comprehension skills are lacking here almost every day.