Based on a review of the 2020 election lawsuits filed by Donald Trump and his allies, it is
partially accurate that many cases were dismissed due to procedural issues such as standing and venue, but this does not tell the full story. While many were dismissed on procedural grounds,
judges also dismissed dozens of cases on the merits after reviewing evidence and finding it insufficient to prove fraud or change the election outcome.
Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits:
The various claims of evidence alleging a stolen 2020 election have been exhaustively investigated and litigated. Judges heard claims of illegal voting and found they were without merit. (Learn more about how the changes that have happened since 2020 will affect the 2024 election and...
campaignlegal.org
The court noted that many plaintiffs failed to include crucial information in their allegations, such as locations of alleged misconduct, frequency of alleged misconduct, names of those involved in alleged misconduct, and so on.
Overall, the court found the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud to be speculative, filled with “guess-work,” and often unsubstantiated.