Bondi Going Bye Bye

[teddyearp]

Oct 22, 2016
Trump vowing to sue 'every one' of his female accusers

"Every one of these liars will be sued once the election is over," Trump said, adding, "I look so forward to doing that."



ALMOST TEN YEARS LATER, NOT ONE OF THE 13 HAVE BEEN SUED.

He also said he was going to jail Hillary. He didn't.

 

[berg80]

View attachment 1238866

Again with the meme's. Can't put a cogent sentence together?

 

[teddyearp]

She couldn't get anything to stick on Comey, Brennan etc.

She threw out 23,000 cases involving DEEP STATE TREASON and THAT's why you and Faux News and left wing Dem Candycorn love her, she's a traitor just like you.

The reason she couldn't get anything to stick was because of the Senate blocking Trump's appointments. Have they finally finished confirming his appointments yet? It's only been a year and a quarter. The judge tossed the indictments on a technicality, that the attorney wasn't properly appointed and therefore not qualified to stand in front of a grand jury. It's the judges too.

 

[Hollie]

The word "stole" implies intent. Get back to me when you have evidence to that effect. SC Robert Hur cleared Joe of criminal charges regarding the retention of classified documents.

BTW, Biden didn't refuse to return anything that was taken nor did he fail to comply with a subpoena for the return of classified docs. See the difference?

SC Hur also cleared Biden of being competent to stand trial. Hur Acknowledged that Ole’ Stumblebum was not fit to stand trial.

 

[Hollie]

But you recognize the bind she was in, right? Obey trump, break the law. Don't obey trump, get fired.

You can’t recognize your own leftist biases,

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The reason she couldn't get anything to stick was because of the Senate blocking Trump's appointments.

Total nonsense.

Trump didn't appoint the grand juries.

 

[Marener]

The reason she couldn't get anything to stick was because of the Senate blocking Trump's appointments. Have they finally finished confirming his appointments yet? It's only been a year and a quarter. The judge tossed the indictments on a technicality, that the attorney wasn't properly appointed and therefore not qualified to stand in front of a grand jury. It's the judges too.

The Senate doesn’t want to confirm political hacks who are just there to do Trump’s corrupt bidding.

 

[Hollie]

The Senate doesn’t want to confirm political hacks who are just there to do Trump’s corrupt bidding.

The leftist hacks in the senate are obstructing as ordered.

 

[Marener]

The leftist hacks in the senate are obstructing as ordered.

Your problem is with the constitution which requires advice and consent.

It’s a critical check on the presidents power.

You don’t like it because you’re an authoritarian.

 

[mudwhistle]

Again with the meme's. Can't put a cogent sentence together?

When I'm talking to an idiot like you why waste my time debating a brick wall.

You're too stupid to think logically.

 

[teddyearp]

Total nonsense.

Trump didn't appoint the grand juries.

No, I guess you like to cherry pick? It was the attorney who he had tried to appoint that the judge disqualified, not the grand jury. The judge threw out the indictment(s) because he said the attorney who went before the grand jury to procure them wasn't actually properly appointed.

 

[teddyearp]

The Senate doesn’t want to confirm political hacks who are just there to do Trump’s corrupt bidding.

And failing that, democrat senators all across the country are using the blue slip process to deny that any conservative attorney or judge makes it in their state, because they are doing someone else's bidding. Whose I wonder?

 

[Hollie]

Your problem is with the constitution which requires advice and consent.

It’s a critical check on the presidents power.

You don’t like it because you’re an authoritarian.

Your problem is with leftist ideology which is retrograde and self- loathing.

 

[Marener]

And failing that, democrat senators all across the country are using the blue slip process to deny that any conservative attorney or judge makes it in their state, because they are doing someone else's bidding. Whose I wonder?

They’ll accept conservative. Just not hacks.

There’s a huge difference.

 

[j-mac]

Then present your evidence that Hur said Biden could have been criminally charged. I'll wait.

I already gave it to you…

 

[j-mac]

And yet you're the one who has been wrong about everything on this thread.

Sure bud.

 

[Hollie]

They’ll accept conservative. Just not hacks.

There’s a huge difference.

More of your hack conspiracy theories.

 

[j-mac]

You have made claims. That’s all

Wrong as usual

 

[j-mac]

I'm familiar with the quote. It's one of many you liars have taken out of context.

Yes, when the truth is revealed, it’s always “you’re taking it out of context”… lol, you people are hilarious…

 

[Marener]

Yes, when the truth is revealed, it’s always “you’re taking it out of context”… lol, you people are hilarious…

When is the truth going to be revealed?

Soon?

Two weeks?