Zoom Rookie Joined Nov 14, 2011 Messages 2,215 Reaction score 286 Points 0 Dec 16, 2012 Banned #1 He had a good point. I am all for gun ownership. I am not for civilians owning semi automatic assult weapons. What's next, tanks?
He had a good point. I am all for gun ownership. I am not for civilians owning semi automatic assult weapons. What's next, tanks?
Paulie Diamond Member Joined May 19, 2007 Messages 40,771 Reaction score 6,394 Points 1,830 Dec 16, 2012 #2 No we're going right for nukes bro. No more sitting in trees for hours smelling like shit in the hopes that MAYBE a deer walks by. We're nuking the whole ******* forest. No question that you got one.
No we're going right for nukes bro. No more sitting in trees for hours smelling like shit in the hopes that MAYBE a deer walks by. We're nuking the whole ******* forest. No question that you got one.
Zoom Rookie Joined Nov 14, 2011 Messages 2,215 Reaction score 286 Points 0 Dec 16, 2012 Thread starter Banned #3 Ok. Nukes for school children.
Mad Scientist Feels Good! Joined Sep 15, 2008 Messages 24,196 Reaction score 5,437 Points 270 Dec 16, 2012 #4 If you can carry it, you should be able to own it. The Gov't owns it, why can't we?
Zoom Rookie Joined Nov 14, 2011 Messages 2,215 Reaction score 286 Points 0 Dec 16, 2012 Thread starter Banned #5 Mad Scientist said: If you can carry it, you should be able to own it. The Gov't owns it, why can't we? Click to expand... So, you want to own a nuclear weapon because the govt owns them? Surface to air missles perhaps?
Mad Scientist said: If you can carry it, you should be able to own it. The Gov't owns it, why can't we? Click to expand... So, you want to own a nuclear weapon because the govt owns them? Surface to air missles perhaps?