Blue city blues: Horrifying video shows Phoenix cop beating up pregnant woman

hqdefault.jpg
 
According to his son Peter Ford's book Glenn Ford: A Life (2011), Ford had affairs with 146 actresses, all of which were documented in his personal diaries, including a 40-year, on-and off-again affair with Rita Hayworth that began during the filming of Gilda in 1945.

146! I guess he needed a strong pimp hand. ;)
 
Last edited:
According to his son Peter Ford's book Glenn Ford: A Life (2011), Ford had affairs with 146 actresses, all of which were documented in his personal diaries, including a 40-year, on-and off-again affair with Rita Hayworth that began during the filming of Gilda in 1945.
No wonder he looks so tired.
 
I'll say it again: female police officers are in general not able to de-escalate these situations without use of excessive force.

Yet, blue city police departments keep hiring them to fill quotas imposed by left-wing mayors and city councils (of which Phoenix has both).

This sh-t is sick.

Holy shit on a shingle!! You just love to make shit up!! You find one case of a female cop using excess force and you think tat makes a case for not hiring women as cops? That is a blatant and egregious logical fallacy- an over generalization fallacy .

Female officers account for a significantly smaller fraction of use-of-force incidents compared to their male counterparts. Studies indicate that while female officers make up around 12% to 14% of sworn officers in the U.S., they are generally responsible for a disproportionately lower percentage of excessive force complaints—often representing under 5% of such incidents in major departments like the NYPD
Don't you understand how stupid this makes you look? You don't understand? Well, maybe its because you're ............well , you know
 
No. Not lots.

Cops come from the general local population. SOME of them are psychopaths, far fewer than Lots.

You’re arguing about the quantity by using subjective terms.

How about this? TOO MANY of them are violent psychopaths.
 
You’re arguing about the quantity by using subjective terms.

How about this? TOO MANY of them are violent psychopaths.
Now define too many?

I'd say one, but in truth, there is already a screening program in place but it missed things.

But Too Many is a subjective term as well.

Start dealing in real numbers, whole or as a percentage, then you might have something to talk about.

Otherwise, it's just more cop hatred.
 
Now define too many?

I'd say one, but in truth, there is already a screening program in place but it missed things.

But Too Many is a subjective term as well.

Start dealing in real numbers, whole or as a percentage, then you might have something to talk about.

Otherwise, it's just more cop hatred.

Of course “too many” is subjective. Just like “lots” and “some”.

I just made a general statement. I’m not trying to argue about subjective quantities. That’s all you.

“It’s not LOTS, it’s only SOME!” :rolleyes:
 
Of course “too many” is subjective. Just like “lots” and “some”.

I just made a general statement. I’m not trying to argue about subjective quantities. That’s all you.

“It’s not LOTS, it’s only SOME!” :rolleyes:
Lots imply a significant amount of corruption.

Some imply exactly that. Some got through.

Whatever.

The bottom line is that Law Enforcement is nowhere near as corrupt as the progressive nazis think.
 
15th post
Lots imply a significant amount of corruption.

“Significant amount of corruption” is also subjective.

You’re using subjective phrases to argue subjective quantities. :rolleyes-41:

Just stop. You have to realize how stupid this is by now.
 
“Significant amount of corruption” is also subjective.

You’re using subjective phrases to argue subjective quantities. :rolleyes-41:

Just stop. You have to realize how stupid this is by now.
Just stop. You sound more stupid than normal.
 
Back
Top Bottom