Blowing up ID’iot creationism.

[Moonglow]

Creationism, although false, is interesting to read.

I preferred, "I Dream of Genie".

 

[Calypso Jones]

You could always take the lead and provide some evidence for ID’iot creationism.

first off....before that poster answers you if he so chooses to argue with idiots.... you do realize that evolutionists say that life must have resulted from nonlife. right? and by accident at that

BUT, that goes against the Law of Biogenesis which says that nonlife CANNOT produce life. THAT is called Science. Secondly, evolution does not pass the test of observable science.. there are no observable occurences of the naturalistic evolutionary model NOR has it been replicated. And not from want of attempting it. NEVER replicated.

 

[petro]

Physicists can't explain the missing matter of the Universe, so they invent the terms Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

A unseen, unproven and undetectable force accelerating the expansion.

Sounds like a Faith based belief to me.

 

[DukeU]

 

[Muhammed]

Your feelings are hurt, right?

Which stupidly ridiculous feelings? moron?

 

[JustAGuy1]

You could always take the lead and provide some evidence for ID’iot creationism.

I'm not the one beating their chest about what she believes. I get it, your ego and "Narcissism" demand that you swear that you are the smartest little girl in the room, have at it. I am content in your need for self delusion.

 

[DukeU]

More false accusations from ignorant creationists?

There's no such thing as nothing. Nothing doesn't exist.

You don't even know the science you're trying to argue against.

Religion should stay out of science. Stick to your scope and everyone will be a lot happier.

If evolution exists, how can there be absolute truth?

 

[scruffy]

oh...post those 18 converging lines of evidence...i'd like to see that.

morphology
physiology
anthropology
animal behavior
embryology
physics
chemistry
genetics
molecular biology
geology
paleontology
medicine
mathematics
computer science
cosmology
sociology
epigenetics
neuroscience

Did I miss any?

 

[scruffy]

If evolution exists, how can there be absolute truth?

Huh?

You mean physics? Or morality? ???

 

[DukeU]

first off....before that poster answer you if he so chooses to argue with idiots.... you do realize that evolutionists say that life must have resulted from nonlife. right? and by accident at that.
BUT, that goes against the Law of Biogenesis which says that nonlife CANNOT produce life. Secondly, evolution does not pass the test of observable science.. there are no observable occurences of the naturalistic evolutionary model NOR has it been replicated. And not from want of attempting it. NEVER replicated.

The "science" is constantly changing because it's true.

 

[scruffy]

The "science" is constantly changing because it's true.

A theory is not absolute truth.

Any logician or mathematician or philosopher will tell you that absolute truth doesn't exist.

Even the phenomenologists agree that perceptions do not represent truth.

Everything in logic and math has predicates. They go by names like axioms, lemmas, and theorems.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Creationism, although false, is interesting to read.

The "science" is constantly changing because it's true.

Science is constantly changing...yet something that is true, irrevocably true, does not change.... you have to spell it out to those that are hardwired into the THEORY of evolution. Sometimes you even have to define THEORY For them.

Proverbs 30:5​

“Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him.”

 

[DukeU]

Huh?

You mean physics? Or morality? ???

Time and matter are constantly changing according to the evolution theory? Right?

If everything is changing how does truth remain?

So, do you believe what you are saying is true?????

The minute you say you believe in absolute truth, you have just blown-up evolution, which states everything is changing.

 

[DukeU]

Any logician or mathematician or philosopher will tell you that absolute truth doesn't exist

Is that absolutely true???

 

[lafayette]

first off....before that poster answers you if he so chooses to argue with idiots.... you do realize that evolutionists say that life must have resulted from nonlife. right? and by accident at that

BUT, that goes against the Law of Biogenesis which says that nonlife CANNOT produce life. THAT is called Science. Secondly, evolution does not pass the test of observable science.. there are no observable occurences of the naturalistic evolutionary model NOR has it been replicated. And not from want of attempting it. NEVER replicated.

This is about creationism, punker joe, not evolution, so get to it.

 

[scruffy]

Time and matter are constantly changing according to the evolution theory? Right?

No. That's a different theory. More along the lines of cosmology.

If everything is changing how does truth remain?

There is an area of mathematics called group theory. You should check it out.

So, do you believe what you are saying is true?????

I never lie.

The minute you say you believe in absolute truth, you have just blown-up evolution, which states everything is changing.

I believe in science. Independent observation and repeatable results. Truth is too nebulous a concept for my puny mind.

 

[DukeU]

No. That's a different theory. More along the lines of cosmology.



There is an area of mathematics called group theory. You should check it out.



I never lie.


I believe in science. Independent observation and repeatable results. Truth is too nebulous a concept for my puny mind.

You have made many TRUTH statements in these few pages....

But, your leaders say it doesn't exist?


If truth doesn't exist, how can what you're saying be true??

 

[scruffy]

You have made many TRUTH statements in these few pages....

No, I mainly focused on what's NOT true.

That part is easier.

But, your leaders say it doesn't exist?

What leaders?

If truth doesn't exist, how can what you're saying be true??

You're being thick.

Why are you talking about philosophy in a thread pertaining to science?

 

[buttercup]

Any logician or mathematician or philosopher will tell you that absolute truth doesn't exist.

Not only is that ^ false, but the claim that absolute truth doesn't exist is demonstrably self-defeating and illogical.

For the statement "absolute truth doesn't exist" to be true, (actually true, universally true) the statement itself would have to be an absolute truth. And if that statement is an absolute truth, then it is self-defeating, or self-contradictory.

I see you have a lot to learn.

 

[scruffy]

Not only is that ^ false, but the claim that absolute truth doesn't exist is demonstrably self-defeating and illogical.

For the statement "absolute truth doesn't exist" to be true, (actually true, universally true) the statement itself would have to be an absolute truth. And if that statement is an absolute truth, then it is self-defeating, or self-contradictory.

I see you have a lot to learn.

Horseshit. You're full of it.