Blame Bush now?

[red states rule]

so..the answer to my question is: none?

why not just say so?

Since your beloved Dems have accused them of crimes - they do not want them put on trial?

Or is it more of the typical support the left shows the troops?

 

[maineman]

Since your beloved Dems have accused them of crimes - they do not want them put on trial?

Or is it more of the typical support the left shows the troops?

you said the reason democrats wanted to bring the troops home was to try them for war crimes. care to back away from that statement? yes or no?

 

[red states rule]

you said the reason democrats wanted to bring the troops home was to try them for war crimes. care to back away from that statement? yes or no?

Since your Dems have accused them of crimes, since they want to surrendder so badly - since they have put their political future in the US losing in Iraq - what other reason would they have?

 

[maineman]

prove your slanderous allegation or back away from it.

quit spinning.

 

[red states rule]

prove your slanderous allegation or back away from it.

quit spinning.

Not spinning

To be slanderous, the comment must be known to be wrong

So my statement is NOT slanderous

 

[maineman]

Not spinning

To be slanderous, the comment must be known to be wrong

So my statement is NOT slanderous

then provide me with the quotes from democrats that explicitly state that the reason we want to bring the troops home from Iraq is to try them for war crimes.

 

[red states rule]

then provide me with the quotes from democrats that explicitly state that the reason we want to bring the troops home from Iraq is to try them for war crimes.

I have provided quotes from Dems smearing, indulting, and accusing the troops of crimes - and you spin and dismiss them

 

[maineman]

I have provided quotes from Dems smearing, indulting, and accusing the troops of crimes - and you spin and dismiss them

you said that democrats wanted to bring the troops home so badly because we want to put them on trial for war crimes. Either back that slanderous statement up with quotes that prove it, or retract it. your choice.

 

[red states rule]

you said that democrats wanted to bring the troops home so badly because we want to put them on trial for war crimes. Either back that slanderous statement up with quotes that prove it, or retract it. your choice.

So now truth to a loyal Dem is slanderous?

 

[maineman]

If you have a quote from a democrat who says that we want to bring our troops home from Iraq so that we can charge them with war crimes, please present it. barring that, I have not seen ANY "truth" from you on this issue.

 

[red states rule]

If you have a quote from a democrat who says that we want to bring our troops home from Iraq so that we can charge them with war crimes, please present it. barring that, I have not seen ANY "truth" from you on this issue.

It will prove to be their motive. Much like they want to shut down political speech, the contempt the left has for the military is well known

 

[maineman]

It will prove to be their motive. Much like they want to shut down political speech, the contempt the left has for the military is well known

so...your baseless crystal ball opinion about the future allows you to slander democrats in the present and accuse them of wanting to bring our troops home just so they can try them for war crimes? And you have no quotes from any democrat saying that? And you don't ahave the balls to admit that you overstated your case and substituted partisan opinion for fact?

Have I got that right?

 

[Bullypulpit]

Now I understand why the left wants to bring the troops home from Iraq so badly

They want to put them on trial for war crimes

Just what nether region of your arse did you pull that from? And, I know it's useless to ask, Do you have anything to support that assertion, beyond some right wing-nut talking heads pronouncements?

 

[trobinett]

Never have I seen such a group of ass holes intent on blaming those that represent THEM so engrossed in blaming others for THEIR decisions.

**** YOU, and the shallow world you live in.

 

[maineman]

Never have I seen such a group of ass holes intent on blaming those that represent THEM so engrossed in blaming others for THEIR decisions.

**** YOU, and the shallow world you live in.

the pronouns used above were a bit cryptic so I am not entirely sure of the real meaning, but I will say, that, although I may BLAME some of those who represent me (Snowe and Collins) for their votes regarding Iraq - and my congressman (Allen) did NOT, I voted for Allen and for the opponents of both Snowe and Collins at every opportunity.

Vis a vis my votes for congressional representation, my individual conscience is clear and I am not at all upset with anyone I voted for (unless, of course, if you count the opponents of Snowe and Collins who did not run very effective campaigns).

 

[red states rule]

Never have I seen such a group of ass holes intent on blaming those that represent THEM so engrossed in blaming others for THEIR decisions.

**** YOU, and the shallow world you live in.

Libs will never join the rest of us in fighting the war on terror

They are to busy fighting their war on Bush

 

[maineman]

yawn....

another day, more stupid neocon slogans from the bushbot.

THINK!

 

[red states rule]

yawn....

another day, more stupid neocon slogans from the bushbot.

THINK!

Another day and MM employs another liberal debate tactic. When confronted with facts - attack the messenger

 

[maineman]

Libs will never join the rest of us in fighting the war on terror

They are to busy fighting their war on Bush

here is a little english lesson:

the above statement does not qualify as a "fact".

it is, instead, your "opinion"

and as I have said on numerous occasions, I am more than willing and ready to go after the folks that attacked us. I think that radical islamic extremists are our most dangerous enemy in the whole world.

So when 300 of them can have an outdoor graduation ceremony in broad daylight with TV cameras recording the event in a country that we have KNOWN since 9/11 has harbored those very enemies that attacked us...and we are supposedly "occupying" that country.... while we have 150K troops in another country that was run, not by radical islamic extremists, but by secular sunni baathists, IMHO, we are not fighting our true enemies as effectively as we ought to be.

 

[red states rule]

here is a little english lesson:

the above statement does not qualify as a "fact".

it is, instead, your "opinion"

and as I have said on numerous occasions, I am more than willing and ready to go after the folks that attacked us. I think that radical islamic extremists are our most dangerous enemy in the whole world.

So when 300 of them can have an outdoor graduation ceremony in broad daylight with TV cameras recording the event in a country that we have KNOWN since 9/11 has harbored those very enemies that attacked us...and we are supposedly "occupying" that country.... while we have 150K troops in another country that was run, not by radical islamic extremists, but by secular sunni baathists, IMHO, we are not fighting our true enemies as effectively as we ought to be.

What have Dems done to fight terrorism

they want to surrender in Iarq

they want to protect the rights of terrorists

they leak classified documents on the methods used to track terrorists

they would rather hold hearings then work with the administration to fight terrorism

they whine about terrorists being held at GITMO

and they cry over what methods are used to get information to prevent more terrorists attacks