Black man stabs Orthodox Jew while yelling “Free Palestine!”

Well of course it’s important. Blacks attacking defenseless Orthodox Jews has been a problem for decades. No need to hide that fact. Now blacks have a NEW excuse, thanks to all the anti-Israel propoganda the Left is spreading.
It isn’t that clear, it depends on where you are and in many cases attacks don’t have a clear ideological motive or the people are mentally unstable.

Another interesting article examining this and talking about building bridges between communities, which judging from your posts in this thread, is not what you want to do yet it is one of the best ways to fight antisemitism (or racism or Islamophobia).


Trigger warning: you might not like it because it doesn’t involve pitting minorities against each other.

So, am I correct in assuming that you feel the race of this attacker being Black is so important it needs to be in the title even though it was buried in the article itself?






But again….why do you not object when a blacktivist opens a thread about a white attacking a black? Why are you glad to show that the violence is perpetrated by a white, when it is, but scream racist when it’s a black - and it’s not hidden?

More double standards from the Left.
If I objected every post and poster you feel I should be objecting to it would take a lifetime. Given you don’t follow this, why do you expect others to? I’ll take my lead from you…feel free to begin.
 
Too long a read for you? Or…is it that Trump won’t even consider a Jewish person as VP?
No, you’re just too ridiculous to even waste time on. Trump was the best president for the Jews in my lifetime.
 
eagle1462010

Can you imagine if Trump were considering a black for VP, and his advisors told him not to pick a black because there are so many KKK members in the party that he could lose the election?

The left would be outraged, and rightly so. But because the Dems was dissing the Jew, and in order to maintain the votes of the Muslims, there are excuses and denials.

Except no one said, "Don't pick Shapiro because he's Jewish." No one.

You seem not to get that people can be outraged by the GENOCIDE going on in Gaza, but still be fine with Jewish politicians. I've voted for J.B. Pritzker twice. I think he's done a fine job, even during Covid. (Unlike Trump, he never bragged about his ratings or made an enemy of his top medical advisors.)

If you read the Nation Article that Coyote was kind enough to post, Shapiro came into the interview making demands of what his role would be, while Walz was charming and supportive. As a wise resume writer once said, "The Resume only gets you into the interview; the interview gets you the job."
 
I explained to you the political calculus that goes into a VP pick. Candidates want to win. All of the candidates on the short list supported Israel, you realize that right?

Here is an article that provides some insight into the decision: No, Josh Shapiro Wasn’t Snubbed for VP Because He's Jewish


Now…if you are going to be consistent, you should be asking yourself why Trump “snubbed” Jews by not even considering a Jewish person for VP. You should be similarly outraged. Are you?

A very good article.

It was more about how both men approached the interview process than anything else. She asked the very basic question, "Which guy do I want to work with for the next 8 years?"
 
But he won’t pick a Jew as a running mate.
So

He recognized Jerusalem as their capital. Many before have SAID they would. He actually did it.

The left in this country accuse them if Geoncide and have been for decades.

Its BS. But an effective BRAIN WASHING Trick
 
So

He recognized Jerusalem as their capital. Many before have SAID they would. He actually did it.

The left in this country accuse them if Geoncide and have been for decades.

Its BS. But an effective BRAIN WASHING Trick
And Trump’s advisors never told him NOT to pick a Jew because he would offend the antisemites. That the Democrats are so concerned with not offending the Jew-hating Muslims is a very chilling sign of bad times ahead - for Jews.

And this is nothing new. When Trump wanted to ramp down on all the liberal Jew-hate on college campuses, he issued an EO withholding federal funds from the Arab-funded antisemitic colleges, and he wanted it to be permanent legislation. The Republicans were onboard with it. Who objected? Democrats, including Nadler and Schumer. And why? They were afraid of offending Muslims.

IOW, they would rather Jewish students been beaten up than hurt Muslims’ feelings.
 
So

He recognized Jerusalem as their capital. Many before have SAID they would. He actually did it.

The left in this country accuse them if Geoncide and have been for decades.

Its BS. But an effective BRAIN WASHING Trick

Um, no, Israel meets the UN definition of Genocide.


"The definition contained in Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part. "

That sounds pretty close to what the Israelis are trying to do in Gaza.

Also, there was a good reason why past presidents didn't put the embassy in Jerusalem.
 
A very good article.

It was more about how both men approached the interview process than anything else. She asked the very basic question, "Which guy do I want to work with for the next 8 years?"
They were all good candidates but some people are hell bent on finding some way to make it about antisemitism (or for that matter, racism) when it is largely a political calculation and, at the end as you point out, personal.
 
Nope. The Hamas parents chose to use their children as shields. Evil POS.
And notice how the HAMAS-supporting idiots never mention what the savages did - by intention - to the Jewish babies. The one that haunts me is the one they baked to death in the oven, forcing the parents to watch, and then they tortured the parents to death.
 
And Trump’s advisors never told him NOT to pick a Jew because he would offend the antisemites.
Neither did Harris's. Which is why she seriously considered two Jews - Shapiro and Pritzker.

Number of Jews on Trump's short list? Zero.

That the Democrats are so concerned with no offending the Jew-hating Muslims is a very chilling sign of bad times ahead - for Jews.

The problem with that kind of thinking is that it assumes that we should put the concerns of 16 million Jews over 1 Billion Muslims. Or you could do the very sensible thing and try to strive for a balanced approach.

About half of Israelis don't like what Netanyahu is doing, but American politicians are supposed to pledge undying loyalty to him?

And this is nothing new. When Trump wanted to ramp down on all the liberal Jew-hate on college campuses, he issued an EO withholding federal funds from the Arab-funded antisemitic colleges, and he wanted it to be permanent legislation. The Republicans were onboard with it. Who objected? Democrats, including Nadler and Schumer. And why? They were afraid of offending Muslims.

Um, Colleges should be bastions of free speech. The problem with people like you is that you don't WANT people discussing what is going on in Palestine.

IOW, they would rather Jewish students been beaten up than hurt Muslims’ feelings.

Um, you guys aren't going to make GENOCIDE in Gaza go away by not letting anyone talk about it.
 
They were all good candidates but some people are hell bent on finding some way to make it about antisemitism (or for that matter, racism) when it is largely a political calculation and, at the end as you point out, personal.
I personally wanted her to pick Kelly, but Walz is good.
 
And Trump’s advisors never told him NOT to pick a Jew because he would offend the antisemites.
Neither did Harris’.


That the Democrats are so concerned with not offending the Jew-hating Muslims is a very chilling sign of bad times ahead - for Jews.

And this is nothing new. When Trump wanted to ramp down on all the liberal Jew-hate on college campuses, he issued an EO withholding federal funds from the Arab-funded antisemitic colleges, and he wanted it to be permanent legislation. The Republicans were onboard with it. Who objected? Democrats, including Nadler and Schumer. And why? They were afraid of offending Muslims.

IOW, they would rather Jewish students been beaten up than hurt Muslims’ feelings.
And yet Trump didn’t have a single Jew, not one…on his potential VP list.
 
You just outed yourself Lisa. Are you also going to perpetrate the claim that Blacks were overwhelmingly behind the attacks on elderly Asians during Covid?

Um.

I hate to break it to ya pal.

But there's a reason why those reports were everywhere and then suddenly stopped when they didn't suit the Narrative...
 
And notice how the HAMAS-supporting idiots never mention what the savages did - by intention - to the Jewish babies. The one that haunts me is the one they baked to death in the oven, forcing the parents to watch, and then they tortured the parents to death.

How do you know that is how it went down? Maybe the parents hid the baby, and it cooked when the house burned down.

There's a lot of savagery on both sides for this conflict. What turned me against the Zionists was the Shabra and Shatila Massacre of 1982. Women and children were slaughtered after their fighters left Lebanon as part of a peace deal with the Zionists.

There are no clean hands over there. There never is in war.
 
I personally wanted her to pick Kelly, but Walz is good.
I could have gone with any of them really, but I think Walz is unexpectedly the best mostly because he seems to be a genuinely nice, down to earth guy and his background, the people who work with, all seem to support that.
 
I found it very hypocritical, that stupid blacks, would change their religion to Islam(you know the religion of peace) while not realizing that it was the Muslims who back in the day, were trading slaves from Africa to the rest of the world. I guess this was never taught to black kids in the inner schools.

Learn What Role Islam Played in Slavery in Africa

It's no more idiotic than LGBTQ for Hamas.

No less either.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom