Black Fake History Being Institutionalized

[Snouter]

Folks I watched a little C-Span thing earlier today (one of the Negroes thought Thomas Jefferson banged a Black and impregnated her) when Blacks indirectly claim Americans prevented Blacks from learning how to read and write, otherwise they would rule America like Jews do. Folks, Blacks would be living in mud huts with no written language right now, were it not for the Black slave traders who negotiated favorable deals with Jewish slave traders. The Blacks should be thankful they got here since they obviously could not sail a fucking windsurfer if their life depended on it. (They sink like a rock in water, and generally cannot swim.)

 

[Pogo]

Folks I watched a little C-Span thing earlier today (one of the Negroes thought Thomas Jefferson banged a Black and impregnated her) when Blacks indirectly claim Americans prevented Blacks from learning how to read and write, otherwise they would rule America like Jews do. Folks, Blacks would be living in mud huts with no written language right now, were it not for the Black slave traders who negotiated favorable deals with Jewish slave traders. The Blacks should be thankful they got here since they obviously could not sail a fucking windsurfer if their life depended on it. (They sink like a rock in water, and generally cannot swim.)

Losing entry in Creative Writing Class. Scored an 11. Below zero.

 

[reconmark]

Folks I watched a little C-Span thing earlier today (one of the Negroes thought Thomas Jefferson banged a Black and impregnated her) when Blacks indirectly claim Americans prevented Blacks from learning how to read and write, otherwise they would rule America like Jews do. Folks, Blacks would be living in mud huts with no written language right now, were it not for the Black slave traders who negotiated favorable deals with Jewish slave traders. The Blacks should be thankful they got here since they obviously could not sail a fucking windsurfer if their life depended on it. (They sink like a rock in water, and generally cannot swim.)

Let's deconstruct your usual nonsense...
It's common factual DNA proven knowledge that Jefferson fathered children with Sally Hemings.
Your ignorance of the matter is no one's fault except yours.

Again your ignorance of commonly known factual historical fact is on display when you ignorantly assert that literacy among slaves was not severely enforced and attempts at literacy could include punishments up to and including death.

Blacks lived in Mud Huts for the same reason whites lived in caves and hovels, your point???

Whites should thank the Indians that helped save them from starvation as they were too ignorant to plant, save or form a method to feed themselves.
The Indians were paid for their humanity in the usual white colonizers way; murder, rape, enslavement ,banishment and the bottom rung of an imagined racial hierarchy.

Black people that have exposure to pools and bodies of water as children can swim as well or better than many whites, I can and so can she;

Courtesy of Maritza McClendon (aka Maritza Correia).


In 2002, Maritza became the first African American to break an American record in swimming.


In 2004, Maritza became the first African American to earn a place on the U.S. Olympic Swim Team, where she won a silver medal on the 4×100 freestyle relay.

or he:

Cullen Andrew Jones (born February 29, 1984) is an American competition swimmer and Olympic gold medalist who specializes in freestyle sprint events. As part of the American team, he holds the world record in the 4×100-meter freestyle relay (long course). At the 2012 Summer Olympics, he won silver medals in the 4 x 100-meter freestyle relay and the 50-meter freestyle, as well as the gold in the 4 x 100-metre medley.​

 

[reconmark]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

 

[AveryJarhman]

#TheLargerIssue #Fatherlessness #ChildNeglectMaltreatment #MentalHealth #SOLUTIONS

The Blacks should be thankful they got here since they obviously could not sail a fucking windsurfer if their life depended on it. (They sink like a rock in water, and generally cannot swim.)

This nasty comment is despicable and totally uncalled for!

END THE HATE....

 

[IM2]

Folks I watched a little C-Span thing earlier today (one of the Negroes thought Thomas Jefferson banged a Black and impregnated her) when Blacks indirectly claim Americans prevented Blacks from learning how to read and write, otherwise they would rule America like Jews do. Folks, Blacks would be living in mud huts with no written language right now, were it not for the Black slave traders who negotiated favorable deals with Jewish slave traders. The Blacks should be thankful they got here since they obviously could not sail a fucking windsurfer if their life depended on it. (They sink like a rock in water, and generally cannot swim.)

You need to quit watching drunk history.

 

[bodecea]

Folks I watched a little C-Span thing earlier today (one of the Negroes thought Thomas Jefferson banged a Black and impregnated her) when Blacks indirectly claim Americans prevented Blacks from learning how to read and write, otherwise they would rule America like Jews do. Folks, Blacks would be living in mud huts with no written language right now, were it not for the Black slave traders who negotiated favorable deals with Jewish slave traders. The Blacks should be thankful they got here since they obviously could not sail a fucking windsurfer if their life depended on it. (They sink like a rock in water, and generally cannot swim.)

^ a trumpanzee in good standing.

 

[Snouter]

This nasty comment [that Blacks and even Browns biologically generally cannot swim] is despicable and totally uncalled for!

The fact is Blacks and most Browns sink like a fucking rock in water. Why is reality "nasty" to you? One of my first lessons in Advanced Lifesaving was that non-Whites cannot swim generally speaking and keep a special lookout on them or they will drown. In other words, you would rather see non-Whites drown than accept the fact they cannot swim. Very sad and very racist!

 

[IM2]

This nasty comment [that Blacks and even Browns biologically generally cannot swim] is despicable and totally uncalled for!

The fact is Blacks and most Browns sink like a fucking rock in water. Why is reality "nasty" to you?

If that was the case it would be due to the fact we have less fat.

 

[Snouter]

IM2, IMO our African American brothers and sisters are often more obese than our White Trash Americans. But you address the topic scientifically which I thank you for. Back in the day it was thought bone density was the issue. But why is it me as a White guy can actually swim carrying a Black back to shore. I am not that buoyant!

The fact is bouncing a basketball and jumping toward a hoop is less impressive than treading water indefinitely.

 

[IM2]

IM2, IMO our African American brothers and sisters are often more obese than our White Trash Americans. But you address the topic scientifically which I thank you for. Back in the day it was thought bone density was the issue. But why is it me as a White guy can actually swim carrying a Black back to shore. I am not that buoyant!

The fact is bouncing a basketball and jumping toward a hoop is less impressive than treading water indefinitely.

I'm black bitch. Your comment was racist. And really quite ignorant. It had nothing to do with the OP and there I is no fake back history. There is black history left out of the books that gets revealed that whites like you cannot deal with because it renders your fake white supremacy for what it is. Imaginary. Blacks have rescued whites from drowning. I can swim too. So can all my black friends. The fact is that you can't jump or dribble while running full speed apparently. You only tread water for long periods of time in water polo. Both take skills.

 

[ptbw forever]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

 

[IM2]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

So if you weren't around for slavery how could you make this claim when you definitely were not around then either?

 

[ptbw forever]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

So if you weren't around for slavery how could you make this claim when you definitely were not around then either?

Because Shakespeare was “illiterate” for most of his life.

 

[reconmark]

This nasty comment [that Blacks and even Browns biologically generally cannot swim] is despicable and totally uncalled for!

The fact is Blacks and most Browns sink like a fucking rock in water. Why is reality "nasty" to you? One of my first lessons in Advanced Lifesaving was that non-Whites cannot swim generally speaking and keep a special lookout on them or they will drown. In other words, you would rather see non-Whites drown than accept the fact they cannot swim. Very sad and very racist!

My post proved you as an ignorant fool, are you asking for more???

 

[reconmark]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

Which proves what???...smh.

 

[ptbw forever]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

Which proves what???...smh.

That your statistics mean nothing.

People from that time frame could run circles around the “elite” of today.

 

[IM2]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

So if you weren't around for slavery how could you make this claim when you definitely were not around then either?

Because Shakespeare was “illiterate” for most of his life.

That proves nothing.

 

[IM2]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

Which proves what???...smh.

That your statistics mean nothing.

People from that time frame could run circles around the “elite” of today.

And I'm quite sure you'd love to visit the doctor for your annual bloodletting.

 

[reconmark]

The Reformation dawned on European societies where literacy was restricted. At the end of the Middle Ages, the ability to write was restricted to less than 10% of men and hardly any women possessed it. This fundamental division between the sexes persisted for centuries and throughout the early modern period male achievements almost always overshadowed those by women. For example, one bridegroom in three could not sign Amsterdam’s marriage register in 1630 compared with two-thirds of brides. Until the eighteenth century the rate of improvement for men generally exceeded that for women, so that the gap between the sexes seldom narrowed. Amsterdam brides and grooms both saw illiteracy fall between 1680 and 1780: males from 30% illiteracy to 15% and females from 56% to 36%.14 The literacy of townspeople also grew more quickly than that of rural dwellers and the wealthier merchants and professionals inhabited city centres where concentrations of reading and writing ability were especially high, distinguishing them even from suburban dwellers. By the mid-eighteenth century London and Paris had literacy levels of over 90%, which would not be achieved nationally until the late nineteenth century.

For much of it's history, Europe was an illiterate country. Your notion that whites were sitting in universities and composing novels is just another example of your historical ignorance.

Illiterate Europeans back then had a much better grasp of their mother tongue than today’s westerners.

Which proves what???...smh.

That your statistics mean nothing.

People from that time frame could run circles around the “elite” of today.

First, they aren't "my" statistics; they are scientific fact. Which you can't refute, which means you can't disprove their validity.
Second, you have absolutely no scientific proof that people from that time frame could run circles around anything, hence your lack of supporting evidence.
Stop trying so desperately to prove your nonsense.