Bill Clinton testifies Trump was not involved with Epstein

Did Bill Clinton follow Donald Trump everywhere he went? If Donald Trump molested a 13 year old girl with Jeffrey Epstein, for example, do you think he invited Bill Clinton along?

No?

Okay, then.

Nice try.
TDS is rotting your brain!

You and your imaginary 13 year old accuser from the Jerry Springer show apparently know more than Bill Clinton, Obama's DOJ and Biden’s DOJ put together!

You have a very special form of TDS. You have 2 brain cells left and their fighting to their death! Lol
 
Last edited:
I do not know the exact question asked of him or his exact answer.
I suppose he could have claimed he never SAW nor HEARD that Trump had sex with minors on the island.

I heard Trump say this morning that he wasn't crazy about Billy being made to testify. Sounds like Trump and Clinton got together, both agreed that the whole matter was not something they wanted dragged into as presidents, and agreed to cover for each other. Maybe Trump is getting soft actually thinking that if he plays nice with the Clintons one last time, democrats will play nicer with him?
 
I heard Trump say this morning that he wasn't crazy about Billy being made to testify. Sounds like Trump and Clinton got together, both agreed that the whole matter was not something they wanted dragged into as presidents, and agreed to cover for each other. Maybe Trump is getting soft actually thinking that if he plays nice with the Clintons one last time, democrats will play nicer with him?
I edited my post.

We do have a direct quote from Bill.
 
According to his knowledge.

In other words he didn’t witness anything

That’s not an exoneration unless you think Clinton spent every waking moment with Trump for two decades
I never saw nor heard of Trump doing bad
That is an exoneration and you multi name lib loon liars are scrambling Hugely to now discredit Bill
Just like your hate for Trump overwhelms your caring about American citizens , it now overwhelms your adoration of Clinton
You are emotionally feeble people who will back stab in an instant Anyone who does not try to frame Trump
 
For the hundredth time

Biden COULD not release them because of investigations that were ongoing as well as court cases and appeals

You know that

Stop being dishonest
All those things are still ongoing
Stop lying
 
It has been already
You keep pointing to the “missing” myth
Oh you simpleton.
Bondi claims she has released all "Necessary Documents" when in FACT, much is still missing.
How can you be confused on this issue?

In short: A massive amount of material is now public (far more than in prior court unsealing episodes from 2024 or earlier), and the DOJ claims compliance with the law. But credible reporting, congressional scrutiny, and the gap between identified and released pages indicate that not everything has been disclosed—particularly if one defines "entire" as every possible record without exceptions or gaps. No evidence points to a further major release since late January 2026. For the primary source, check the official DOJ Epstein Library at https://www.justice.gov/epstein.


  • Attorney General Pam Bondi and others have affirmed that all required DOJ-held documents have been released.
However, significant controversy and evidence suggest the release is not complete:

  • The DOJ identified potentially up to 6 million pages of qualifying evidence, but only about 3.5 million have been made public.
  • Investigations by outlets like NPR and The New York Times (as of late February 2026) found dozens of pages (e.g., FBI interview summaries and notes) missing from the public database, including some related to allegations involving President Trump.
  • Lawmakers from both parties (including Republicans like Rep. Thomas Massie and Rep. James Comer) have criticized the release as insufficient, called for investigations into withholdings, and demanded remaining internal memos or other materials.
  • Some documents were withheld under privileges, for ongoing investigations, or privacy reasons, and there were issues like initial publication of unredacted sensitive images (later partially removed).
  • Wikipedia and other summaries describe the collection as "partially released."
 
I never saw nor heard of Trump doing bad
That is an exoneration and you multi name lib loon liars are scrambling Hugely to now discredit Bill
Just like your hate for Trump overwhelms your caring about American citizens , it now overwhelms your adoration of Clinton
You are emotionally feeble people who will back stab in an instant Anyone who does not try to frame Trump
Wrong. Your love for racism overwhelms your caring about American citizens. That is why you support Trump.
 
TDS is rotting your brain!

You and your imaginary 13 year old accuser from the Jerry Springer show apparently know more than Bill Clinton, Obama's DOJ and Biden’s DOJ put together!

You have a very special form of TDS. You have 2 brain cells left and their fighting to their death! Lol
There is no imaginary 13-year-old. That real 13-year-old is on record testifying to the FBI 3 or 4 times.
 
Wrong. Your love for racism overwhelms your caring about American citizens. That is why you support Trump.
You did not address the fact but rather your fiction of feelings and accusatory babbling thereof
 
Oh you simpleton.
Bondi claims she has released all "Necessary Documents" when in FACT, much is still missing.
How can you be confused on this issue?

In short: A massive amount of material is now public (far more than in prior court unsealing episodes from 2024 or earlier), and the DOJ claims compliance with the law. But credible reporting, congressional scrutiny, and the gap between identified and released pages indicate that not everything has been disclosed—particularly if one defines "entire" as every possible record without exceptions or gaps. No evidence points to a further major release since late January 2026. For the primary source, check the official DOJ Epstein Library at https://www.justice.gov/epstein.


  • Attorney General Pam Bondi and others have affirmed that all required DOJ-held documents have been released.
However, significant controversy and evidence suggest the release is not complete:

  • The DOJ identified potentially up to 6 million pages of qualifying evidence, but only about 3.5 million have been made public.
  • Investigations by outlets like NPR and The New York Times (as of late February 2026) found dozens of pages (e.g., FBI interview summaries and notes) missing from the public database, including some related to allegations involving President Trump.
  • Lawmakers from both parties (including Republicans like Rep. Thomas Massie and Rep. James Comer) have criticized the release as insufficient, called for investigations into withholdings, and demanded remaining internal memos or other materials.
  • Some documents were withheld under privileges, for ongoing investigations, or privacy reasons, and there were issues like initial publication of unredacted sensitive images (later partially removed).
  • Wikipedia and other summaries describe the collection as "partially released."
Oh you name caller with no facts. The feeling that Biden was “prohibited from” is another wishful feeling
 
15th post
Covering each other? Nice. Bros stick together?
Come on this thread was "prepared " by a MAGA dolt !!!

FAKE!!!

Former President Bill Clinton told members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that it’s “for you to decide” whether to call up current President Donald Trump to testify in the panel’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, Chair James Comer told reporters Friday.

“[He] went on to say that, ‘President Trump has never said anything to me to make me think he was involved and he met with Epstein,’” Comer, a Kentucky Republican, recalled Clinton telling the committee during his deposition.

“I know there’s a lot of curiosity about President Trump,” Comer continued. “I thought that was an interesting thing that President Clinton said.”

But Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in a subsequent news conference during a break in the deposition proceedings that Comer’s remarks were not an “accurate description” of Clinton’s testimony.


Report from the BBC

Garcia says Bill Clinton "did bring up some additional information about some discussions with President Trump".

He pushes back on earlier comments from James Comer, the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee, who said Clinton testified that he has no knowledge of Trump being involved in Epstein's crimes.

"I don't think it's a complete, accurate description of what actually was said. So let's release the full transcript," Garcia says.
He ends the briefing by repeating his demand for Trump to testify before the committee.


So far there is only an OPENING STATEMENT publicly viewable - nothing else.

 
Last edited:
This Epstein thing has been a major blow back to the demafacist party

Just a disaster
It has? How? Btw, who's illegally not releasing the rest of those files & redacting the names of the scum who were involved in Epstein's child rape cult?

Here's a hint. It ain't Democrats.
 
Back
Top Bottom