Biden's Former Chief of Staff Admits Kamala Harris Vice Presidency Was a Failure

[excalibur]

Even Dems know it.

Secretly, any number want her to lose in November. Why? So they can set themselves up for 2028, that is why.

If Harris were to win, they'd be done for 2028 and have to wait until the 2032 election cycle. And most of those would be past their sell by days in the 2032 cycle.

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris that you come across a rather startling admission by Joe Biden’s former chief of staff, Ron Klain. He basically admits that the Democrats’ nominee for president failed in her VP gig.

The New York Times headline Sunday certainly might make you think that Harris had mastered the intricacies of the job: “A Vice Presidential Learning Curve: How Kamala Harris Picked Her Shots,” it reads. But after first describing how Harris was “deliberate and disciplined” despite the many pitfalls she faced as the first female vice president, the Times finally got to the point (emphasis mine):

[Klain] …acknowledged that she [Harris] was not always well served by the White House. “We were all united behind the idea she should be successful. We just didn’t find the path to do it,” he said.
“People really liked her,” Mr. Klain added. “There’s a lot of enthusiasm for her. And I don’t think we did a good enough job of selling her.”

Frankly, that assessment makes all three of them—Klain, Biden, and Harris—look incompetent. Political commentator and Fox News pundit Steve Hilton took note:

Meanwhile, although much of the media has spent the days since the beginning of Kamala’s campaign pretending she had nothing to do with the border and bears no responsibility for the fiasco, the Times begrudgingly admits it here [emphasis mine]:

But she was also saddled with no-win assignments, most notably tackling the root causes of illegal immigration from Central America, exposing her to Republican criticism. Stung by an early television interview that went awry, she became skittish about mistakes, asking whether an appearance or a line in a speech might produce another vicious viral clip. And her allies believed the president’s staff often clipped her wings, appropriating her initiatives for him to announce without building up her own public profile.

Notice how the authors manage to criticize what we can presume to be Republicans in their angle? Her senseless ramblings might produce “another vicious viral clip.” But what exactly is vicious about playing her own words?

We’ve also been regularly told how close the president and vice president are and that they have a deep friendship and respect for each other. Doesn't really pass the smell test, though:

Ms. Harris came into the role without a close relationship with her new president. Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the two did not campaign together much in 2020, and there were sore feelings among some around Mr. Biden, including Jill Biden, stemming from Ms. Harris’s attack on him during a Democratic primary debate over his position on busing to integrate schools in the 1970s.

Biden also didn’t really need her “expertise”:

After a half-century in Washington, Mr. Biden did not need Ms. Harris to explain the capital to him, or at least did not think he did. She came with scant experience in international affairs that the former Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman particularly valued. He did not assign her to lead major negotiations with lawmakers as Mr. Obama had him do.

The long article is mostly deferential and complimentary to the vice president, but one can’t help but come away with one key takeaway: they’re trying to sell us a failed vice president as the next commander-in-chief. What could go wrong?​

Biden's Former Chief of Staff Admits Kamala Harris Vice Presidency Was a Failure

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris th

redstate.com

 

[candycorn]

never happened.

 

[justoffal]

Even Dems know it.

Secretly, any number want her to lose in November. Why? So they can set themselves up for 2028, that is why.

If Harris were to win, they'd be done for 2028 and have to wait until the 2032 election cycle. And most of those would be past their sell by days in the 2032 cycle.

​

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris that you come across a rather startling admission by Joe Biden’s former chief of staff, Ron Klain. He basically admits that the Democrats’ nominee for president failed in her VP gig.​

​

The New York Times headline Sunday certainly might make you think that Harris had mastered the intricacies of the job: “A Vice Presidential Learning Curve: How Kamala Harris Picked Her Shots,” it reads. But after first describing how Harris was “deliberate and disciplined” despite the many pitfalls she faced as the first female vice president, the Times finally got to the point (emphasis mine):​

​

​

​

Frankly, that assessment makes all three of them—Klain, Biden, and Harris—look incompetent. Political commentator and Fox News pundit Steve Hilton took note:​

​

Meanwhile, although much of the media has spent the days since the beginning of Kamala’s campaign pretending she had nothing to do with the border and bears no responsibility for the fiasco, the Times begrudgingly admits it here [emphasis mine]:​

​

​

​

​

​

Notice how the authors manage to criticize what we can presume to be Republicans in their angle? Her senseless ramblings might produce “another vicious viral clip.” But what exactly is vicious about playing her own words?​

​

We’ve also been regularly told how close the president and vice president are and that they have a deep friendship and respect for each other. Doesn't really pass the smell test, though:​

​

​

​

​

Biden also didn’t really need her “expertise”:​

​

​

​

The long article is mostly deferential and complimentary to the vice president, but one can’t help but come away with one key takeaway: they’re trying to sell us a failed vice president as the next commander-in-chief. What could go wrong?​

Biden's Former Chief of Staff Admits Kamala Harris Vice Presidency Was a Failure

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris th

redstate.com

Let the back-stabbery begin! I don't think Joe is working behind the scenes for her.

 

[Kilroy2]

Even Dems know it.

Secretly, any number want her to lose in November. Why? So they can set themselves up for 2028, that is why.

If Harris were to win, they'd be done for 2028 and have to wait until the 2032 election cycle. And most of those would be past their sell by days in the 2032 cycle.

​

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris that you come across a rather startling admission by Joe Biden’s former chief of staff, Ron Klain. He basically admits that the Democrats’ nominee for president failed in her VP gig.​

​

The New York Times headline Sunday certainly might make you think that Harris had mastered the intricacies of the job: “A Vice Presidential Learning Curve: How Kamala Harris Picked Her Shots,” it reads. But after first describing how Harris was “deliberate and disciplined” despite the many pitfalls she faced as the first female vice president, the Times finally got to the point (emphasis mine):​

​

​

​

Frankly, that assessment makes all three of them—Klain, Biden, and Harris—look incompetent. Political commentator and Fox News pundit Steve Hilton took note:​

​

Meanwhile, although much of the media has spent the days since the beginning of Kamala’s campaign pretending she had nothing to do with the border and bears no responsibility for the fiasco, the Times begrudgingly admits it here [emphasis mine]:​

​

​

​

​

​

Notice how the authors manage to criticize what we can presume to be Republicans in their angle? Her senseless ramblings might produce “another vicious viral clip.” But what exactly is vicious about playing her own words?​

​

We’ve also been regularly told how close the president and vice president are and that they have a deep friendship and respect for each other. Doesn't really pass the smell test, though:​

​

​

​

​

Biden also didn’t really need her “expertise”:​

b​

​

​

The long article is mostly deferential and complimentary to the vice president, but one can’t help but come away with one key takeaway: they’re trying to sell us a failed vice president as the next commander-in-chief. What could go wrong?​

Biden's Former Chief of Staff Admits Kamala Harris Vice Presidency Was a Failure

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris th

redstate.com

How convenient that you use a story by the NYT. Need a subscription to read what they are saying.

Very convenient

You guys are worried that she might win.

losing faith in Trump



So why don't you copy and paste it since you have a subscription to the NYT

Still it sounds like one persons opinion.

 

[wamose]

Think about that. You have the easiest job in government and you still end up being the worst of all time. That's pretty bad, even for a commie. MAGA

 

[Independent thinker]

Even Dems know it.

Secretly, any number want her to lose in November. Why? So they can set themselves up for 2028, that is why.

If Harris were to win, they'd be done for 2028 and have to wait until the 2032 election cycle. And most of those would be past their sell by days in the 2032 cycle.

​

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris that you come across a rather startling admission by Joe Biden’s former chief of staff, Ron Klain. He basically admits that the Democrats’ nominee for president failed in her VP gig.​

​

The New York Times headline Sunday certainly might make you think that Harris had mastered the intricacies of the job: “A Vice Presidential Learning Curve: How Kamala Harris Picked Her Shots,” it reads. But after first describing how Harris was “deliberate and disciplined” despite the many pitfalls she faced as the first female vice president, the Times finally got to the point (emphasis mine):​

​

​

​

Frankly, that assessment makes all three of them—Klain, Biden, and Harris—look incompetent. Political commentator and Fox News pundit Steve Hilton took note:​

​

Meanwhile, although much of the media has spent the days since the beginning of Kamala’s campaign pretending she had nothing to do with the border and bears no responsibility for the fiasco, the Times begrudgingly admits it here [emphasis mine]:​

​

​

​

​

​

Notice how the authors manage to criticize what we can presume to be Republicans in their angle? Her senseless ramblings might produce “another vicious viral clip.” But what exactly is vicious about playing her own words?​

​

We’ve also been regularly told how close the president and vice president are and that they have a deep friendship and respect for each other. Doesn't really pass the smell test, though:​

​

​

​

​

Biden also didn’t really need her “expertise”:​

​

​

​

The long article is mostly deferential and complimentary to the vice president, but one can’t help but come away with one key takeaway: they’re trying to sell us a failed vice president as the next commander-in-chief. What could go wrong?​

Biden's Former Chief of Staff Admits Kamala Harris Vice Presidency Was a Failure

It’s not until you're somewhat deep into yet another mainstream media puff piece of Kamala Harris th

redstate.com

The only thing she really failed at at VP was in not exposing Biden's mental and physical health. Other than that, the VP is basically a worthless position that does nothing anyway. You pretty much can't fail at VP because there is nothing to fail at.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Let the back-stabbery begin! I don't think Joe is working behind the scenes for her.

Harris is Biden's revenge on the Party that shivved him like he was Caesar on the Ides of March. Xi personally came in to anoint Newsome and Biden gave him and the DNC the middle finger

 

[DGS49]

A lot of the Leftist political ads these days point to Republicans and "former Republicans" who have bad things to say about Trump.

I wonder if similar operatives on the Right would be able to find anyone who has worked with KH and would be willing to state that they don't think she is qualified or suited to the position of President.

I suspect there would be a large number of such people, but their testimony would be worthless, since everyone already knows that.

 

[lafayette]

Ron Klain admitted nothing of the sort.

 

[Kilroy2]

Klain will reportedly step down from his role as White House Chief of Staff following the State of the Union Feb. 7, according to USA Today. Biden’s former COVID-19 Response Coordinator, Jeff Zients, is expected to replace Klain, CNN reported.

So Klain lost his job

there was b an “official transition” event at the White House next week to “thank Ron for his tireless work

Republican operatives claim he was in on the fixed election whom were also republican

The Facebook post purports Klain was allegedly arrested by the U.S. Special Forces for his supposed role in helping to steal the 2020 presidential election as he allegedly attempted to flee the country.

Special forces checked the books and could not find where they arrested him.

Republican source were quick to come up with another reason for his departure in 2024

I have determined that Klein who was fired now blames Harris for him being fired

Harris in comments says, the name sounds familiar and you say he was the former chief of staff. Okay I checked that out , thanks for letting me know.

FACT CHECK: Was Ron Klain Arrested?

The claim stems from a satirical website

checkyourfact.com

W

 

[Woodznutz]

The only thing she really failed at at VP was in not exposing Biden's mental and physical health. Other than that, the VP is basically a worthless position that does nothing anyway. You pretty much can't fail at VP because there is nothing to fail at.

"A bowl of warm spit." -Lyndon Johnson

 

[Independent thinker]

"A bowl of warm spit." -Lyndon Johnson

On top of that, the president often puts the VP in charge of something they can't do themselves and let the VP take the fall for the failure.