The right of The People to bear arms, and the mention of the Malita, are exclusively separated by a COMMA; they are not connected.Which specifically talks about WELL REGULATED MILITIAS.
The problem with the misinterpretation of the Second Amendment is that it was never about "guns", (which aren't even mentioned) it was about the regulation of Militias and how they could be used The original draft of the Second also allowed for religious exemptions for militia service, and it goes right into the Third Amendment, which prohibits quartering of troops in civilian homes/areas in peacetime.
Gun ownership was rare in Colonial times (The firing mechanisms had to be imported from Europe) and muskets were only effective when fired in Volleys.
But we've taken this Militia Amendment out of context to mean that any crazed lunatic can own a military grade weapon, and then you wonder why we have mass shootings.
Learn how to decipher English, dumbass.