Biden DOJ Dragging Feet on Prosecuting Attempted Assassin of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

[Crepitus]

The one on justice Kavanaugh…some dembot brownshirt was acting out on chuck schmer’s orders

Don't be stupider than you have to be, Schumer didn't order anyone to harm Bart O'Kavenaugh.

So what did this guy do, take a shot at him, poison him, what?

 

[Coyote]

Well, except the man was mentally ill and turned himself in before he hurt anyone, but don't let facts like that get in your way.

Seriously….the desperation is strong in this thread. More rightwing self victimization.


Like….hellooooo…the guy never even got close to Kavanaugh, instead sat outside, put down his weapons, and called the police on himself. So he is so e kind of Uber dangerous assassin deliberately being “slow walked”..right.

 

[struth]

Don't be stupider than you have to be, Schumer didn't order anyone to harm Bart O'Kavenaugh.

So what did this guy do, take a shot at him, poison him, what?

Of course he did.

 

[Crepitus]

Of course he did.

Both poisoned and shot him?

 

[struth]

Both poisoned and shot him?

Chucky gave the order, this guy attempted to follow it

 

[Crepitus]

Chucky gave the order, this guy attempted to follow it

What order?

 

[struth]

What order?

To harm the justices

 

[Crepitus]

To harm the justices

Post it up.

 

[struth]

Post it up.

I did, we keep gojng in circles,…cause you are a dopesy dembot

 

[Kilroy2]

Supreme Court ruling makes it harder to convict someone of making a threat

The Biden administration had warned that the internet and social media have expanded the number and kinds of threats in recent years, including online harassment, intimidation and stalking.

www.pbs.org

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to make it more difficult to convict a person of making a violent threat, including against the president or other elected officials.

this was last year with a conservative judges majority

Seven justices agreed with the outcome. Two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett, dissented.

 

[struth]

Supreme Court ruling makes it harder to convict someone of making a threat

The Biden administration had warned that the internet and social media have expanded the number and kinds of threats in recent years, including online harassment, intimidation and stalking.

www.pbs.org

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to make it more difficult to convict a person of making a violent threat, including against the president or other elected officials.

this was last year with a conservative judges majority

Seven justices agreed with the outcome. Two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett, dissented.

This wasn’t an internet or social media threat

 

[Kilroy2]

This wasn’t an internet or social media threat

Well the ruling does specify communications as the source of the threat


The question for the court was whether prosecutors must show that a person being prosecuted for making a threat knew their behavior was threatening or whether prosecutors just have to prove that a reasonable person would see it as threatening.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote for a majority of the court that prosecutors have to show that “the defendant had some subjective understanding of the threatening nature of his statements.”

“The State must show that the defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence,” she said.

Free speech is not a defense in making verbal threats.

 

[Crepitus]

I did, we keep gojng in circles,…cause you are a dopesy dembot

What post?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Well, except the man was mentally ill and turned himself in before he hurt anyone, but don't let facts like that get in your way.

Wait…are you seriously suggesting that since he wasn’t able to through with it, that, it’s all good? We just…let it go?

 

[struth]

What post?

Geez your too stupid to read…dopey dembots

 

[struth]

Well the ruling does specify communications as the source of the threat


The question for the court was whether prosecutors must show that a person being prosecuted for making a threat knew their behavior was threatening or whether prosecutors just have to prove that a reasonable person would see it as threatening.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote for a majority of the court that prosecutors have to show that “the defendant had some subjective understanding of the threatening nature of his statements.”

“The State must show that the defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence,” she said.

Free speech is not a defense in making verbal threats.

The assassination attempt on Kavanaugh wasn’t a threat…it was an actual attempt on hhs life

 

[JoeB131]

Wait…are you seriously suggesting that since he wasn’t able to through with it, that, it’s all good? We just…let it go?

I would suggest that because he is mentally ill, and stopped himself, there should be some compassion in how to deal with him.

 

[struth]

I would suggest that because he is mentally ill, and stopped himself, there should be some compassion in how to deal with him.

What mental illness, besides dembotism, does he suffer from?

 

[JoeB131]

What mental illness, besides dembotism, does he suffer from?

'I Need Psychiatric Help': California Man Charged with Targeting Brett Kavanaugh Told 911 Dispatcher He'd Previously 'Been Hospitalized Multiple Times'

The man accused of targeting Justice Brett Kavanaugh this week but who called 911 to stop his own alleged plot admitted he needed "psychiatric help" and had "been hospitalized multiple times."

lawandcrime.com

Not to worry, though, thanks to Rapey Kavanaugh and his buddies on SCOTUS, being batshit crazy doesn't limit your legal ability to own a gun!!!

Sleep tight, boys (and lady).

 

[struth]

'I Need Psychiatric Help': California Man Charged with Targeting Brett Kavanaugh Told 911 Dispatcher He'd Previously 'Been Hospitalized Multiple Times'

The man accused of targeting Justice Brett Kavanaugh this week but who called 911 to stop his own alleged plot admitted he needed "psychiatric help" and had "been hospitalized multiple times."

lawandcrime.com

Not to worry, though, thanks to Rapey Kavanaugh and his buddies on SCOTUS, being batshit crazy doesn't limit your legal ability to own a gun!!!

Sleep tight, boys (and lady).

why should it?

Being a dembot is a serious mental illness, glad he is finally getting the help he needs