Biden Admits He Doesn't Have Support Of Police

[Oddball]

"I grew up in a town where you either became a policeman, fireman, or a priest."

What a positively idiotic and completely untrue throw-away line....I don't give a hoot in hell how small your town is, if you're going to try to say that those are your only viable career options, you're too stupid to be a county commissioner, let alone the president.

The outer sunset district in San Francisco, circa the 1950's was much like what Mr. Biden stated. The homes there were built in the sand post WW II, homeowners were civil servants, salesmen, retail clerks, restaurant workers and bartenders. MIddle income workers capable of getting by with a single worker, a single car and enough income to put their kids through college.

Of course Odd Dude would mock the former VP. I wonder what Odd Dude gets out of being a curmudgeon and kvetch.

Completely irrelevant to what I posted.

Now go take your meds, Francis.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Biden Admits He Doesn't Have Support Of Police

Doesn't look like he needs it

View attachment 397827

So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?

Many of the swing states are seeing more and more infections of Covid-19; and still Donald Trump is mocking the virus. Is it any wonder that so many trump 2016 voters are supporting Joe Biden?

More and more "Republicans for Biden" signs are being sold and displayed on front yards.

Mocking? 99.97% of the people who get it, survive. We should all be "mocking" the bad cold.

 

[Harry Dresden]

You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.

Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.

At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.

At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.

The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.

But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.

Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.

trump is just advancing the divisiveness started by bush,and carried on by obama......all 3 were/are terrible at uniting people....

if you're going to compare what trump does to them...then i'd say you're being quite an apologist.

bush wasnt even that bad, it was the dudes under him, and obama made a couple of uncouth off the cuff comments. if thats the same thing to you...then i dont think we operate within the same reality, lol

he tweets attacks literally like 100x a day and it's pretty much all he ever does.


all day



even in the 1-4am area

they all divided people GT....maybe you are being an apologist for bush and obama.... all 3 sucked big time at bringing the other side to even give them the benefit of the doubt...

No, I'm able to differentiate between typical politician and going full retard, and Trump is on twitter every day going full retard. Trying to be kissy kissy with 'fairness' does not mean there aren't clear levels to all of these things - I'm for the truth, however unfair anyone might find it. Trump divides more than anyone I've ever seen, and that's empirical - - - he says more to divide in a single day on twitter than you can dig up from 16 years of BushObama.

dividing people is dividing people.....the 2 guys you are trying to make excuses for did it enough were the country was way more divided then when Clinton was over....the only difference between these 3 party people is.....trump has a bigger mouth.....

your last 5 words made my case

that was the case i was making


you didnt wanna hear it about trump because you have an axe to grind with fairness

there's empirical answers for things like this, and your last 5 words uncloaked you from your own dissonance of same

oh i do?.....and what fairness would that be?.....

 

[westwall]

Polls!! Polls! Those 1,500 random calls! Place your bets! I remember 2016. We've seen this movie before:

What year is this?

Doesn't matter. The polls are run by the same propagandists as last time.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Biden Admits He Doesn't Have Support Of Police

Doesn't look like he needs it

View attachment 397827

So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?

Many of the swing states are seeing more and more infections of Covid-19; and still Donald Trump is mocking the virus. Is it any wonder that so many trump 2016 voters are supporting Joe Biden?

More and more "Republicans for Biden" signs are being sold and displayed on front yards.

 

[Rye Catcher]

So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?

Not any better.

Would you mind proving that via a link? Specifically: FL, AZ, PA, MN, NH, NV and MI. Not sure about the polls as I have never been polled. Have you? Anyone you know?

Instead of being 'not sure' about the Polls, why don't you instead study their rate of accuracy and make an informed decision on how much weight you give them, in predicting the reality of things?

Everyone rags on polls, the polls have been WAY more accurate at predicting races then these partisans on messageboards screaming "but but but 2016 polls!!" before, yannow, they actually do some digging into the issue.

Those are rhetorical questions. Don't even need 2 bother.

I need more data on who was polled, what questions were asked, etc. Have you ever been polled?

Yes, I've been polled by Siena College.

I have never been polled. Neither have any of my relatives, friends or even friends of friends. I do not know one person who has been polled. Does it mean the polls are incorrect? Not necessarily but I am not sure we can take them as gospel. My only point.

With a nation of 350 million people, it's not news that you and others you know have never been

"I grew up in a town where you either became a policeman, fireman, or a priest."

What a positively idiotic and completely untrue throw-away line....I don't give a hoot in hell how small your town is, if you're going to try to say that those are your only viable career options, you're too stupid to be a county commissioner, let alone the president.

The outer sunset district in San Francisco, circa the 1950's was much like what Mr. Biden stated. The homes there were built in the sand post WW II, homeowners were civil servants, salesmen, retail clerks, restaurant workers and bartenders. MIddle income workers capable of getting by with a single worker, a single car and enough income to put their kids through college.

Of course Odd Dude would mock the former VP. I wonder what Odd Dude gets out of being a curmudgeon and kvetch.

Completely irrelevant to what I posted.

Now go take your meds, Francis.

Please Odd Dude, go do to yourself what VP Cheney told a US Senator to do. Do it in public, since you are halfway there now:

 

[Harry Dresden]

You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.

Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.

At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.

At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.

The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.

But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.

Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.

trump is just advancing the divisiveness started by bush,and carried on by obama......all 3 were/are terrible at uniting people....

if you're going to compare what trump does to them...then i'd say you're being quite an apologist.

bush wasnt even that bad, it was the dudes under him, and obama made a couple of uncouth off the cuff comments. if thats the same thing to you...then i dont think we operate within the same reality, lol

he tweets attacks literally like 100x a day and it's pretty much all he ever does.


all day



even in the 1-4am area

they all divided people GT....maybe you are being an apologist for bush and obama.... all 3 sucked big time at bringing the other side to even give them the benefit of the doubt...

No, I'm able to differentiate between typical politician and going full retard, and Trump is on twitter every day going full retard. Trying to be kissy kissy with 'fairness' does not mean there aren't clear levels to all of these things - I'm for the truth, however unfair anyone might find it. Trump divides more than anyone I've ever seen, and that's empirical - - - he says more to divide in a single day on twitter than you can dig up from 16 years of BushObama.

dividing people is dividing people.....the 2 guys you are trying to make excuses for did it enough were the country was way more divided then when Clinton was over....the only difference between these 3 party people is.....trump has a bigger mouth.....

your last 5 words made my case

that was the case i was making


you didnt wanna hear it about trump because you have an axe to grind with fairness

there's empirical answers for things like this, and your last 5 words uncloaked you from your own dissonance of same

oh i do?.....and what fairness would that be?.....

the kind where instead of realizing you proved my point by saying trump has the biggest mouth...

youd rather still be thinking 'yeah, but all the other guys did it toooo'

your attitude with being unable to gauge the empirical difference in their divisive rhetoric is the cause of these races to the bottom in the first place

GT did bush divide the country more than when clinton was president?.....did obama divide it even further?.....you made excuses for each one of them....maybe your problem is you dont realize you dont have to have a big mouth to divide people.....ever since bush this country has become a war zone.....and your buddy biden aint going to make it any better....

 

[Harry Dresden]

You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.

Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.

At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.

At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.

The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.

But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.

Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.

trump is just advancing the divisiveness started by bush,and carried on by obama......all 3 were/are terrible at uniting people....

if you're going to compare what trump does to them...then i'd say you're being quite an apologist.

bush wasnt even that bad, it was the dudes under him, and obama made a couple of uncouth off the cuff comments. if thats the same thing to you...then i dont think we operate within the same reality, lol

he tweets attacks literally like 100x a day and it's pretty much all he ever does.


all day



even in the 1-4am area

they all divided people GT....maybe you are being an apologist for bush and obama.... all 3 sucked big time at bringing the other side to even give them the benefit of the doubt...

No, I'm able to differentiate between typical politician and going full retard, and Trump is on twitter every day going full retard. Trying to be kissy kissy with 'fairness' does not mean there aren't clear levels to all of these things - I'm for the truth, however unfair anyone might find it. Trump divides more than anyone I've ever seen, and that's empirical - - - he says more to divide in a single day on twitter than you can dig up from 16 years of BushObama.

dividing people is dividing people.....the 2 guys you are trying to make excuses for did it enough were the country was way more divided then when Clinton was over....the only difference between these 3 party people is.....trump has a bigger mouth.....

your last 5 words made my case

that was the case i was making


you didnt wanna hear it about trump because you have an axe to grind with fairness

there's empirical answers for things like this, and your last 5 words uncloaked you from your own dissonance of same

oh i do?.....and what fairness would that be?.....

the kind where instead of realizing you proved my point by saying trump has the biggest mouth...

youd rather still be thinking 'yeah, but all the other guys did it toooo'

your attitude with being unable to gauge the empirical difference in their divisive rhetoric is the cause of these races to the bottom in the first place

GT did bush divide the country more than when clinton was president?.....did obama divide it even further?.....you made excuses for each one of them....maybe your problem is you dont realize you dont have to have a big mouth to divide people.....ever since bush this country has become a war zone.....and your buddy biden aint going to make it any better....

I didn't make one single excuse.

That's what you saw because your emotions didn't like me calling trump the MOST divisive.

That's just empirically true.

Bidens my buddy now too? More emotional lashing out. Biden is asleep. My buddies are awake.

you didnt?....who said this?....."bush wasnt even that bad, it was the dudes under him".....how about this one?..." obama made a couple of uncouth off the cuff comments"...sounds like excuses GT.....and i can give a rats ass about trump.....the guy is a jerk...

 

[easyt65]

SO ARE THE SNOWFLAKES ON THIS BOARD WILLING TO ADMIT BIDEN LIED DURING THE DEBATE WHEN HE SAID HE DID HAVE THE SUPPORT OF POLICE ORGANIZATIONS?

 

[Harry Dresden]

You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.

Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.

At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.

At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.

The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.

But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.

Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.

trump is just advancing the divisiveness started by bush,and carried on by obama......all 3 were/are terrible at uniting people....

if you're going to compare what trump does to them...then i'd say you're being quite an apologist.

bush wasnt even that bad, it was the dudes under him, and obama made a couple of uncouth off the cuff comments. if thats the same thing to you...then i dont think we operate within the same reality, lol

he tweets attacks literally like 100x a day and it's pretty much all he ever does.


all day



even in the 1-4am area

they all divided people GT....maybe you are being an apologist for bush and obama.... all 3 sucked big time at bringing the other side to even give them the benefit of the doubt...

No, I'm able to differentiate between typical politician and going full retard, and Trump is on twitter every day going full retard. Trying to be kissy kissy with 'fairness' does not mean there aren't clear levels to all of these things - I'm for the truth, however unfair anyone might find it. Trump divides more than anyone I've ever seen, and that's empirical - - - he says more to divide in a single day on twitter than you can dig up from 16 years of BushObama.

dividing people is dividing people.....the 2 guys you are trying to make excuses for did it enough were the country was way more divided then when Clinton was over....the only difference between these 3 party people is.....trump has a bigger mouth.....

your last 5 words made my case

that was the case i was making


you didnt wanna hear it about trump because you have an axe to grind with fairness

there's empirical answers for things like this, and your last 5 words uncloaked you from your own dissonance of same

oh i do?.....and what fairness would that be?.....

the kind where instead of realizing you proved my point by saying trump has the biggest mouth...

youd rather still be thinking 'yeah, but all the other guys did it toooo'

your attitude with being unable to gauge the empirical difference in their divisive rhetoric is the cause of these races to the bottom in the first place

GT did bush divide the country more than when clinton was president?.....did obama divide it even further?.....you made excuses for each one of them....maybe your problem is you dont realize you dont have to have a big mouth to divide people.....ever since bush this country has become a war zone.....and your buddy biden aint going to make it any better....

I didn't make one single excuse.

That's what you saw because your emotions didn't like me calling trump the MOST divisive.

That's just empirically true.

Bidens my buddy now too? More emotional lashing out. Biden is asleep. My buddies are awake.

you didnt?....who said this?....."bush wasnt even that bad, it was the dudes under him".....how about this one?..." obama made a couple of uncouth off the cuff comments"...sounds like excuses GT.....and i can give a rats ass about trump.....the guy is a jerk...

They were comparisons, an excuse is when you're morally allowing for something...I didnt do that. Without having to get too retarded because Trump being more divisive than them both combined is just an empirical fact. He works dividing into 100% of his days and doesn't know any other way.

sure they were GT.....sounded like excuses to me....especially the bush excuse....

 

[Thinker101]

You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.

Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.

At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.

At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.

The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.

But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.

Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.

Here's a portion of results from your honest/casual mixed message.

Austin, Texas, $150 million cut
Seattle, $3.5 million cut
New York, $1 billion cut
Los Angeles, $1 billion cut
San Francisco, $120 million cut
Oakland, $14.6 million cut
Washington D.C., $15 million cut
Baltimore $22 million cut
Portland, Oregon, $16 million cut
Philadelphia $33 million cut
Hartford, Conn. $1 million cut

 

[easyt65]

SO ARE THE SNOWFLAKES ON THIS BOARD WILLING TO ADMIT BIDEN LIED DURING THE DEBATE WHEN HE SAID HE DID HAVE THE SUPPORT OF POLICE ORGANIZATIONS?

 

[Thinker101]

You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.

Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.

At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.

At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.

The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.

But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.

Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.

Here's a portion of results from your honest/casual mixed message.

Austin, Texas, $150 million cut
Seattle, $3.5 million cut
New York, $1 billion cut
Los Angeles, $1 billion cut
San Francisco, $120 million cut
Oakland, $14.6 million cut
Washington D.C., $15 million cut
Baltimore $22 million cut
Portland, Oregon, $16 million cut
Philadelphia $33 million cut
Hartford, Conn. $1 million cut

Those numbers are meaningless out of context.

Missing context #1: Reason for the cuts.
Missing context #2: % of the whole of each cut.
Missing context #3: Were the funds reallocated, or truly cut. Was the reallocation or the cut empirically needed, or not...

Along with several other missing contexts that make merely posting those numbers as a fly by meaningless

Of course the funds were reallocated. For some dumbass reason you feel any of these cities will return the funds to taxpayers.