Better Instruction Than Harvard!

[Lumpy 1]

Well sheesh, that's unfair and uninformed but who can stop you?

The guy is an undiluted fool.

I appreciate how easily he reveals same.

You're the fool that doesn't even believe in observation of science. A lot more then that could be said about a piece of trash like you.

She's a Lady and a Great One..

 

[Jughead]

Well sheesh, that's unfair and uninformed but who can stop you?

The guy is an undiluted fool.

I appreciate how easily he reveals same.

You're the fool that doesn't even believe in observation of science. A lot more then that could be said about a piece of trash like you.

Trash?? I think you are painting the wrong person with your delusional views. She's not the one who's obsessive compulsive about science. Do you ever post anything that is not related to science in anyway?

 

[Agit8r]

"By gentlemen are not meant the rich or poor, the high or the low born, the industrious or the idle, but all those who have received a liberal education... by the common people we mean laborers, husbandmen, mechanics, merchants in general, who pursue their occupations and industry without any knowledge of liberal arts and sciences, or in anything but their own trades and pursuits"
-- John Adams; from 'The Right Constitution of a Commonwealth Examined'

 

[DGS49]

(1) People who can AFFORD to go to Harvard (about a third of the people who attend) are from families so wealthy and connected that the education will have no bearing on their financial success or failure.

(2) Most wealthy people in this country basically never have "a job." they run their own companies or prosper in small companies founded by friends or family.

(3) Most of the highest paying jobs require little or no technical knowledge. There was a time when the largest manufacturing and construction companies were headed by Engineers who had made their way up through the ranks, but those days are long gone. Most top-paid execs are accountants and lawyers by training.

(4) Sales is the most potentially lucrative "profession" and it generally requires no technical education, even if you are selling something that is fairly sophisticated.

(5) Engineers are often the first people let go in a downturn.

(6) Harvard could take its Freshman class and put them in a box for four years, and they would still be successful in later life because they are such a highly-select group when admitted. Almost NOBODY is successful because of what they learned in Harvard's classrooms.

(7) The highly-regarded academicians that make Harvard (or any other university) "great" seldom teach any actual undergrad students.

(8) Anyone who uses the word, "quality" as a adjective is an idiot.

 

[Lumpy 1]

(1) People who can AFFORD to go to Harvard (about a third of the people who attend) are from families so wealthy and connected that the education will have no bearing on their financial success or failure.

(2) Most wealthy people in this country basically never have "a job." they run their own companies or prosper in small companies founded by friends or family.

(3) Most of the highest paying jobs require little or no technical knowledge. There was a time when the largest manufacturing and construction companies were headed by Engineers who had made their way up through the ranks, but those days are long gone. Most top-paid execs are accountants and lawyers by training.

(4) Sales is the most potentially lucrative "profession" and it generally requires no technical education, even if you are selling something that is fairly sophisticated.

(5) Engineers are often the first people let go in a downturn.

(6) Harvard could take its Freshman class and put them in a box for four years, and they would still be successful in later life because they are such a highly-select group when admitted. Almost NOBODY is successful because of what they learned in Harvard's classrooms.

(7) The highly-regarded academicians that make Harvard (or any other university) "great" seldom teach any actual undergrad students.

(8) Anyone who uses the word, "quality" as a adjective is an idiot.

You're fun...

 

[Roguewave]

Take for example, one Sandra Y.L. Korn, Havard undergraduate and columnist for the Harvard Crimson who recently wrote a piece in that esteemed journal demanding "academic justice" and abolition of academic freedom aimed at those with whom she and her ilk disagree. She is a prime product of the gender studies rot that permeates the hallowed halls these days.

Read more: American Power: Harvard's Sandra Korn and the Leftist Crusade for 'Academic Justice'